XProc Last Call Comments

Last updated: 01 May 2008 at 13:12:03 UTC

137 comments, 137 closed (100.00%)

Hide closed

closed issues and issues where consensus on a resolution has been reached are colour-coded.

Siblings are date-ordered, the more recent the higher up.

Hover over a [+] to see the message date. Click on a [+]/[-] to toggle inline display of a message; Click on a subject to switch to the message itself in the archive.


137.[+] [Steve Ball] Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipelines list? from Henry S. Thompson on 31-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: [Steve Ball] Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipelines list? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: [Steve Ball] Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipelines list? from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: [Steve Ball] Re: [xml-dev] XML Pipelines list? from Innovimax SARL
136.[+] Media type for pipeline docs and names for pipeline elts from Henry S. Thompson on 27-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: Media type for pipeline docs and names for pipeline elts from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  [closed] Re: Media type for pipeline docs and names for pipeline elts from Norman Walsh
135.[+] Parameter input ports from Alessandro Vernet on 27-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: Parameter input ports from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Parameter input ports from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: Parameter input ports from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Parameter input ports from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  [closed] Re: Parameter input ports from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Parameter input ports from Norman Walsh
134.[+] Variable and option binding proposal from Henry S. Thompson on 25-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Variable and option binding proposal from Henry S. Thompson
133.[+] Fodder for the @name proposal from Norman Walsh on 21-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: Fodder for the @name proposal from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Fodder for the @name proposal from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Fodder for the @name proposal from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Fodder for the @name proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Fodder for the @name proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Fodder for the @name proposal from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Fodder for the @name proposal from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An example of guaranteed proper protection against potential race conditions from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: An example of guaranteed proper protection against potential race conditions from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An example of guaranteed proper protection against potential race conditions from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: An example of guaranteed proper protection against potential race conditions from Innovimax SARL
131.[+] Proposal for p:variable from Innovimax SARL on 20-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: Proposal for p:variable from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Proposal for p:variable from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Proposal for p:variable from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Proposal for p:variable from Innovimax SARL
130.[+] Ditch value=? from Norman Walsh on 19-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: Ditch value=? from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Ditch value=? from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  [closed] Re: Ditch value=? from Norman Walsh
129.[+] subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Henry S. Thompson on 18-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Murray Maloney
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: subpipelines, Vnext and extension elements redux from Norman Walsh
128.[+] (atomic/compound) steps, containers and related issues from Henry S. Thompson on 17-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: (atomic/compound) steps, containers and related issues from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: (atomic/compound) steps, containers and related issues from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: (atomic/compound) steps, containers and related issues from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: (atomic/compound) steps, containers and related issues from Norman Walsh
127.[+] Uncle! New alternate draft from Norman Walsh on 13-Mar-2008
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [first set of comments] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [first set of comments] from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [first set of comments] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [remainder of comments on section 2] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [remainder of comments on section 2] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [remainder of comments on section 2] from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [remainder of comments on section 2] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [more comments through the end of section 4] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [more comments through the end of section 4] from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [more comments through the end of section 4] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [more comments through the end of section 4] from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [comments on some of section 5] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [comments on some of section 5] from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [comments on some of section 5] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [comments on some of section 5] from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [comments on some of section 5] from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [comments on some of section 5] from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Uncle! New alternate draft [comments on some of section 5] from Henry S. Thompson
126.[+] p:pipeline name attribute from James Fuller on 01-Mar-2008
[+]  RE: pipeline name attribute from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: pipeline name attribute from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: p:pipeline name attribute from Norman Walsh
125.[+] The 'href' attribute from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 21-Feb-2008
[+]  Re: The 'href' attribute from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: The 'href' attribute from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  [closed] Re: The 'href' attribute from Norman Walsh
124.[+] p:log feels clunky from James Fuller on 17-Feb-2008
[+]  Re: p:log feels clunky from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: p:log feels clunky from James Fuller
[+]  Re: p:log feels clunky from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: p:log feels clunky from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: p:log feels clunky from Norman Walsh
123.[+] p:pipeinfo from James Fuller on 16-Feb-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: p:pipeinfo from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: p:pipeinfo from James Fuller
122.[+] Naming of p:declare-step from Jeni Tennison on 14-Feb-2008
[+]  Re: Naming of p:declare-step from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Naming of p:declare-step from Norman Walsh
121.[+] xproc static and dynamic error output as xml from James Fuller on 12-Feb-2008
[+]  RE: xproc static and dynamic error output as xml from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: xproc static and dynamic error output as xml from James Fuller
[+]  Re: xproc static and dynamic error output as xml from James Fuller
[+]  Re: xproc static and dynamic error output as xml from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: xproc static and dynamic error output as xml from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: xproc static and dynamic error output as xml from Norman Walsh
120.[+] Parameter input ports with sequence="true" from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 11-Feb-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: Parameter input ports with sequence="true" from Norman Walsh
119.[+] (editorial) p:directory-list from Rui Lopes on 06-Feb-2008
[+]  Re: (editorial) p:directory-list from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: (editorial) p:directory-list from Norman Walsh
118.[+] Assigning values to options from Rui Lopes on 06-Feb-2008
[+]  Re: Assigning values to options from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Assigning values to options from Norman Walsh
117.[+] Document input declarations from Rui Lopes on 06-Feb-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: Document input declarations from Norman Walsh
116.[+] clarify boolean from James Fuller on 06-Feb-2008
[+]  Fwd: clarify boolean from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: clarify boolean from Norman Walsh
115.[+] p:string-replace clarification from James Fuller on 06-Feb-2008
[+]  RE: string-replace clarification from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: string-replace clarification from James Fuller
[+]  Re: string-replace clarification from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: p:string-replace clarification from Norman Walsh
114.[+] p:insert and matching nothing from James Fuller on 06-Feb-2008
[+]  RE: insert and matching nothing from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: insert and matching nothing from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: insert and matching nothing from Norman Walsh
113.[+] some brief nitpicking re p:insert and p:add-attribute from James Fuller on 06-Feb-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: some brief nitpicking re p:insert and p:add-attribute from Norman Walsh
112.[+] propose a implementation defined warning mechanism from James Fuller on 05-Feb-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: propose a implementation defined warning mechanism from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: propose a implementation defined warning mechanism from James Fuller
111.[+] add to implementation defined section from James Fuller on 05-Feb-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: add to implementation defined section from Norman Walsh
110.[+] embed date in schema docs from James Fuller on 05-Feb-2008
[+]  Re: embed date in schema docs from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: embed date in schema docs from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: embed date in schema docs from Norman Walsh
109.[+] Response headers in p:http-request from Vasil Rangelov on 03-Feb-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: Response headers in p:http-request from Norman Walsh
108.[+] Serialization parameters as parameter ports from Vasil Rangelov on 02-Feb-2008
[+]  [CLOSED] Re: Serialization parameters as parameter ports from Alex Milowski
107.[+] Using options in XSLT match patterns from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 30-Jan-2008
[+]  RE: Using options in XSLT match patterns from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  [closed] Re: Using options in XSLT match patterns from Norman Walsh
106.[+] p:viewport cannot match PI or Comments from Innovimax SARL on 25-Jan-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: p:viewport cannot match PI or Comments from Norman Walsh
105.[+] Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 ( part III) from Innovimax SARL on 25-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 ( part III) from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 ( part III) from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 ( part III) from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 ( part III) from Innovimax SARL
[+]  [closed] Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 ( part III) from Norman Walsh
104.[+] Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 ( part II) from Innovimax SARL on 25-Jan-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 ( part II) from Norman Walsh
103.[+] Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 (first part) from Innovimax SARL on 25-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 (first part) from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 (first part) from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Remarks on W3C Editor's Draft 24 January 2008 (first part) from Norman Walsh
102.[+] Default bindings for non-primary inputs from Norman Walsh on 25-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: Default bindings for non-primary inputs from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: Default bindings for non-primary inputs from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  [closed] Re: Default bindings for non-primary inputs from Norman Walsh
101.[+] Output from for-each that gets evaluated zero times from Norman Walsh on 25-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: Output from for-each that gets evaluated zero times from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  [closed] Re: Output from for-each that gets evaluated zero times from Norman Walsh
100.[+] A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 from Norman Walsh on 25-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 from Nikolay Fiykov
[+]  Re: A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 - proposal for p:label-elements from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 - proposal for p:label-elements from Nikolay Fiykov
[+]  Re: A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 - proposal for p:label-elements from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 - proposal for p:label-elements from Nikolay Fiykov
[+]  [closed] Re: A few items cherry-picked from comment #54 from Norman Walsh
099.[+] Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 24-Jan-2008
[+]  RE: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  RE: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  [closed] Re: Implicit parameter input on p:pipeline from Norman Walsh
098.[+] Execution order of steps in a pipeline from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 23-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: Execution order of steps in a pipeline from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: Execution order of steps in a pipeline from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Execution order of steps in a pipeline from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Execution order of steps in a pipeline from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Execution order of steps in a pipeline from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: [closed] Re: Execution order of steps in a pipeline from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
097.[+] Typo in p:label-elements from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 18-Jan-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: Typo in p:label-elements from Norman Walsh
096.[+] p:set-attributes - attributes with the "xmlns" prefix from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 18-Jan-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: p:set-attributes - attributes with the "xmlns" prefix from Norman Walsh
095.[+] Compound steps with empty subpipelines from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 16-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: Compound steps with empty subpipelines from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Compound steps with empty subpipelines from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Compound steps with empty subpipelines from Norman Walsh
094.[+] XSLT pattern matching in p:viewport - matching descendant nodes from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 15-Jan-2008
[+]  [closed] Re: XSLT pattern matching in p:viewport - matching descendant nodes from Norman Walsh
093.[+] p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 14-Jan-2008
[+]  RE: declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  RE: declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  RE: declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  RE: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: p:declare-step - atomic steps vs. empty pipelines from Norman Walsh
092.[+] Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 10-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Comments on Editor's Draft 9 January 2008 from Norman Walsh
091.[+] text output from xslt from Alex Milowski on 10-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: text output from xslt from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: text output from xslt from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: text output from xslt from Norman Walsh
090.[+] Extensibility from Henry S. Thompson on 08-Jan-2008
[+]  Re: Extensibility from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Extensibility from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Extensibility from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Extensibility from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Extensibility from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Do the defaulted source/result on p:pipeline allow sequences? from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Do the defaulted source/result on p:pipeline allow sequences? from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: Do the defaulted source/result on p:pipeline allow sequences? from Norman Walsh
088.[+] Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 20-Dec-2007
[+]  Re: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  Re: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com
[+]  [closed] Re: Questions + comments on XProc WD 14 December 2007 from Norman Walsh
087.[+] xpath-version=2 and XSLTMatchPatterns from Norman Walsh on 11-Dec-2007
[+]  Re: xpath-version=2 and XSLTMatchPatterns from Innovimax SARL
[+]  [closed] Re: xpath-version=2 and XSLTMatchPatterns from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: p:function (a.k.a. a standard mechanism for XPath extensions within XProc) from Norman Walsh
085.[+] A _really_ important question from Henry S. Thompson on 04-Dec-2007
[+]  Re: A _really_ important question from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: A _really_ important question from Rui Lopes
[+]  Re: A _really_ important question from Murray Maloney
[+]  Re: A _really_ important question from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: A _really_ important question from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: A _really_ important question from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Please add Implementation and Test Suite info to the W3C XProc page from Norman Walsh
083.[+] Handling of system IDs from Toman_Vojtech@emc.com on 03-Dec-2007
[+]  Re: Handling of system IDs from Norman Walsh
[+]  Changing base URIs from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Changing base URIs from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: Changing base URIs from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Changing base URIs from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Changing base URIs from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Changing base URIs from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: Handling of system IDs from Norman Walsh
082.[+] Viewport from Richard Tobin on 03-Dec-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Viewport from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: Viewport from Richard Tobin
081.[+] Security considerations: p:exec et al. from Rui Lopes on 30-Nov-2007
[+]  Re: Security considerations: p:exec et al. from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Security considerations: p:exec et al. from Rui Lopes
[+]  [closed] Re: Security considerations: p:exec et al. from Norman Walsh
080.[+] A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Henry S. Thompson on 30-Nov-2007
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Norman Walsh
[+]  Henry's proposed syntax change from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Henry's proposed syntax change from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Henry's proposed syntax change from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Henry's proposed syntax change from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Henry's proposed syntax change from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  [closed] Re: A proposal to restructure our top-level syntax from Norman Walsh
079.[+] Properties of an implicit output port from Norman Walsh on 30-Nov-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Properties of an implicit output port from Norman Walsh
078.[+] sequence-consistency of choose/try branches from Richard Tobin on 30-Nov-2007
[+]  sequence-consistency of choose/try branches from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: sequence-consistency of choose/try branches from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: sequence-consistency of choose/try branches from Norman Walsh
077.[+] normalization-form serialization option from Norman Walsh on 29-Nov-2007
[+]  Re: normalization-form serialization option from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: normalization-form serialization option from Alex Milowski
[+]  [closed] Re: normalization-form serialization option from Alex Milowski
076.[+] RE: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov on 27-Nov-2007
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
075.[+] p:import dynamic errors: should be static? from Julien Biezemans on 25-Nov-2007
[+]  Re: p:import dynamic errors: should be static? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: p:import dynamic errors: should be static? from Julien Biezemans
[+]  Re: p:import dynamic errors: should be static? from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: p:import dynamic errors: should be static? from Norman Walsh
074.[+] editorial bug in 4.3.2 from Henry S. Thompson on 22-Nov-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: editorial bug in 4.3.2 from Norman Walsh
073.[+] minor p:http-request issues from Henry S. Thompson on 22-Nov-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: minor p:http-request issues from Norman Walsh
072.[+] 7.3 Serialization options bug –– doctype–public from Henry S. Thompson on 22-Nov-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: 7.3 Serialization options bug –– doctype–public from Norman Walsh
071.[+] Name Attributes and Fragment Identifiers from Alex Milowski on 12-Nov-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Name Attributes and Fragment Identifiers from Alex Milowski
070.[+] http-request/etc. and URI encoded references from Alex Milowski on 08-Nov-2007
[+]  RE: http-request/etc. and URI encoded references from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  [closed] Re: http-request/etc. and URI encoded references from Alex Milowski
069.[+] Circular Imports from Alex Milowski on 05-Nov-2007
[+]  Re: Circular Imports from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Circular Imports from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: Circular Imports from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Circular Imports from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: Circular Imports from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: Circular Imports from Richard Tobin
[+]  Changes for Circular and Re-entrant Imports from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: Changes for Circular and Re-entrant Imports from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  [closed] Re: Circular Imports from Norman Walsh
068.[+] Should defaulted ports be named? from Richard Tobin on 30-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: Should defaulted ports be named? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Should defaulted ports be named? from Innovimax SARL
[+]  [closed] Re: Should defaulted ports be named? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document from Sharon Adler
[+]  Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document from Nikolay Fiykov
[+]  Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document from Jeni Tennison
[+]  XPath version (Was: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document) from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Steps you can do in XSLT (Was:Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document) from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: Steps you can do in XSLT (Was:Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document) from Petr Cimprich
[+]  Supporting XSLT 2.0 (Was: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document) from Jeni Tennison
[+]  [closed] Re: Comments from the XSLT WG on the XProc Last Call Document from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: Does a primary output have to be connected in all branches? from Norman Walsh
065.[+] clarification of p:pipeline-library and p:import from James Fuller on 24-Oct-2007
[+]  RE: clarification of p:pipeline-library and p:import from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  [closed] Re: clarification of p:pipeline-library and p:import from Norman Walsh
064.[+] proposed changes and clarifications to p:load from James Fuller on 24-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: proposed changes and clarifications to p:load from Norman Walsh
063.[+] propose changing p:directory-list filter option from James Fuller on 24-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: propose changing p:directory-list filter option from Norman Walsh
062.[+] put optional step in different namespace from James Fuller on 24-Oct-2007
[+]  RE: put optional step in different namespace from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: put optional step in different namespace from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: put optional step in different namespace from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Last Call Comment on XProc - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/ from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  [closed] Re: Last Call Comment on XProc - http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-xproc-20070920/ from Norman Walsh
060.[+] Standard (ECMAScript) interface for invoking XProc from Vasil Rangelov on 21-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Standard (ECMAScript) interface for invoking XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Embedding one pipeline into another (or "defaulting pipeline libraries") from Norman Walsh
058.[+] Scope of options from Norman Walsh on 18-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: Scope of options from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: Scope of options from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Scope of options from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Scope of options from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Scope of options from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: Scope of options from Norman Walsh
057.[+] Form urlencode/decode for p:http-request? from Norman Walsh on 18-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: Form urlencode/decode for p:http-request? from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Form urlencode/decode for p:http-request? from Norman Walsh
056.[+] Proposed new step: p:uuid from Norman Walsh on 18-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Proposed new step: p:uuid from Norman Walsh
055.[+] Proposed new step: p:hash from Norman Walsh on 18-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Proposed new step: p:hash from Norman Walsh
054.[+] typo in 3.4 Associating Documents with Ports from James Fuller on 16-Oct-2007
[+]  i meant, there is not document input re 3.4 Associating Documents with Ports from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: typo in 3.4 Associating Documents with Ports from Norman Walsh
053.[+] comments on XProc last-call draft from Nikolay Fiykov on 16-Oct-2007
[+]  RE: comments on XProc last-call draft from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  [closed] Re: comments on XProc last-call draft from Norman Walsh
052.[+] headers in p:http-request from Norman Walsh on 15-Oct-2007
051.[+] p:http-request dynamic error if not c:http-request? from Norman Walsh on 14-Oct-2007
[+]  RE: http-request dynamic error if not c:http-request? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: p:http-request dynamic error if not c:http-request? from mozer
[+]  [closed] Re: p:http-request dynamic error if not c:http-request? from Norman Walsh
050.[+] "Simplified" http-request from Norman Walsh on 14-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: "Simplified" http-request from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: "Simplified" http-request from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: "Simplified" http-request from Alex Milowski
[+]  [closed] Re: "Simplified" http-request from Norman Walsh
049.[+] XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 from Michael Kay on 13-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: XSLT 1.0 and XSLT 2.0 from Norman Walsh
048.[+] a note on spec link usability from James Fuller on 12-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: a note on spec link usability from Norman Walsh
047.[+] is p:inline underspecified? from James Fuller on 12-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: is p:inline underspecified? from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: is p:inline underspecified? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  [Vasil Rangelov] RE: is p:inline underspecified? from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: is p:inline underspecified? from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: is p:inline underspecified? from Norman Walsh
046.[+] xsl-formatter from Norman Walsh on 12-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: clarify 5.11 p:pipe definition and refering to p:pipeline inputs from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: clarify 5.11 p:pipe definition and refering to p:pipeline inputs from Norman Walsh
044.[+] p:xinclude from Norman Walsh on 08-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: p:xinclude from Norman Walsh
043.[+] http and https in p:http-request from Norman Walsh on 08-Oct-2007
[+]  RE: http and https in p:http-request from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: http and https in p:http-request from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: http and https in p:http-request from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  [closed] Re: http and https in p:http-request from Norman Walsh
042.[+] Dynamic errors, choose from Richard Tobin on 08-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: Dynamic errors, choose from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: Dynamic errors, choose from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Dynamic errors, choose from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Dynamic errors, choose from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Dynamic errors, choose from Norman Walsh
041.[+] error in example 4.3.2 with dangling p:pipeline element from James Fuller on 08-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: error in example 4.3.2 with dangling p:pipeline element from Norman Walsh
040.[+] viewport from James Fuller on 08-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: viewport from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: viewport from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: viewport from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: viewport from Norman Walsh
039.[+] Primary parameter input port? from Norman Walsh on 08-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: Primary parameter input port? from mozer
[+]  Re: Primary parameter input port? from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Primary parameter input port? from Norman Walsh
038.[+] Parameter order from Norman Walsh on 07-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: Parameter order from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Parameter order from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Parameter order from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: Parameter order from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Parameter order from Jeni Tennison
[+]  RE: Parameter order from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: Parameter order from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Parameter order from Norman Walsh
037.[+] injecting options and parameters into XProc from James Fuller on 06-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from mozer
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from James Fuller
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from James Fuller
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from James Fuller
[+]  RE: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  re injecting options and another question from James Fuller
[+]  RE: re injecting options and another question from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from James Fuller
[+]  RE: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: injecting options and parameters into XProc from James Fuller
036.[+] what does p:episode actually mean ? from James Fuller on 06-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: what does p:episode actually mean ? from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: what does p:episode actually mean ? from Norman Walsh
035.[+] 2.8.3 XProc Extension Functions from James Fuller on 06-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: 2.8.3 XProc Extension Functions from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: 2.8.3 XProc Extension Functions from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: 2.8.3 XProc Extension Functions from James Fuller
034.[+] dynamic error err:XD0011 and p:document from James Fuller on 06-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: dynamic error err:XD0011 and p:document from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: dynamic error err:XD0011 and p:document from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: dynamic error err:XD0011 and p:document from Norman Walsh
033.[+] xinclude processing and XProc from James Fuller on 06-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: xinclude processing and XProc from mozer
[+]  Re: xinclude processing and XProc from James Fuller
[+]  Re: xinclude processing and XProc from mozer
[+]  Re: xinclude processing and XProc from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: xinclude processing and XProc from Norman Walsh
032.[+] 3.2 Scoping of Names from James Fuller on 06-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: 3.2 Scoping of Names from Norman Walsh
031.[+] Minor error in defn of readable ports from Richard Tobin on 04-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Minor error in defn of readable ports from Norman Walsh
030.[+] Multiple imports from Norman Walsh on 02-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: Multiple imports from Dave Pawson
[+]  Re: Multiple imports from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Multiple imports from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Multiple imports from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: Multiple imports from Norman Walsh
029.[+] Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Richard Tobin on 01-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Rui Lopes
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: Determining whether a pipeline has a (defaulted) output from Norman Walsh
028.[+] output ports of choose, try from Richard Tobin on 01-Oct-2007
[+]  Re: output ports of choose, try from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: output ports of choose, try from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: output ports of choose, try from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: output ports of choose, try from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: output ports of choose, try from Norman Walsh
027.[+] MSFT presentation, feedback from Henry S. Thompson on 01-Oct-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: MSFT presentation, feedback from Norman Walsh
026.[+] Output of p:xslt and p:xslt2 / xpointer from Vasil Rangelov on 29-Sep-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Output of p:xslt and p:xslt2 / xpointer from Norman Walsh
025.[+] p:add-xml-base all=true and relative=true from Norman Walsh on 27-Sep-2007
024.[+] Re: XProc Minutes 27 Sep 2007 from Jeni Tennison on 27-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: XProc Minutes 27 Sep 2007 from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: XProc Minutes 27 Sep 2007 from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: XProc Minutes 27 Sep 2007 from Innovimax SARL
[+]  PSVI support from Norman Walsh
023.[+] p:add-xml-base with relative=true from Norman Walsh on 27-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: p:add-xml-base with relative=true from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  [closed] Re: p:add-xml-base with relative=true from Norman Walsh
022.[+] Re: Comment from Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com on 27-Sep-2007
021.[+] Improve XProc suitability for localization from Jirka Kosek on 26-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: Improve XProc suitability for localization from Jirka Kosek
[+]  Re: Improve XProc suitability for localization from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Improve XProc suitability for localization from Norman Walsh
020.[+] Inconsistency between schema and spec from Jirka Kosek on 26-Sep-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Inconsistency between schema and spec from Norman Walsh
019.[+] p:add-xml-base from Norman Walsh on 25-Sep-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: p:add-xml-base from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: p:add-xml-base from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: p:add-xml-base from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: p:add-xml-base from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: p:add-xml-base from Norman Walsh
018.[+] Scope of step types from Richard Tobin on 24-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: Scope of step types from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Scope of step types from Norman Walsh
017.[+] Re: Comment from Vasil Rangelov on 24-Sep-2007
015.[+] Comment: version and forward compatibility from Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com on 24-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: version and forward compatibility from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: I'm _still_ confused about 3.8 Extension elements from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  [closed] Re: Comment: version and forward compatibility from Norman Walsh
016.[+] Comment: untrusted environments and security from Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com on 24-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security from Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com
[+]  Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security from Dave Pawson
[+]  Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security from James Fuller
[+]  [closed] Re: Comment: untrusted environments and security from Norman Walsh
014.[+] p:xslt and p:xslt2 (and "p:any-xslt"?) from Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com on 24-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: p:xslt and p:xslt2 (and "p:any-xslt"?) from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: p:xslt and p:xslt2 (and "p:any-xslt"?) from Deborah_Pickett@moldflow.com
[+]  [closed] Re: p:xslt and p:xslt2 (and "p:any-xslt"?) from Norman Walsh
013.[+] Saxonica comments on XProc Last-Call WD, sections 5-7 from Michael Kay on 22-Sep-2007
[+]  RE: Saxonica comments on XProc Last-Call WD, sections 5-7 from Michael Kay
[+]  Re: Saxonica comments on XProc Last-Call WD, sections 5-7 from Colin Adams
[+]  [closed] Re: Saxonica comments on XProc Last-Call WD, sections 5-7 from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 3 and 4 from Norman Walsh
011.[+] Editorial comments on Last Call Draft from Innovimax SARL on 22-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: Editorial comments on Last Call Draft from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Editorial comments on Last Call Draft from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Editorial comments on Last Call Draft from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Editorial comments on Last Call Draft from Innovimax SARL
[+]  [closed] Re: Editorial comments on Last Call Draft from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Behaviour of in scope namespaces with respect to the content of ignore-prefixes attribute from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Behaviour of in scope namespaces with respect to the content of ignore-prefixes attribute from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Behaviour of in scope namespaces with respect to the content of ignore-prefixes attribute from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Behaviour of in scope namespaces with respect to the content of ignore-prefixes attribute from Innovimax SARL
[+]  [closed] Re: Behaviour of in scope namespaces with respect to the content of ignore-prefixes attribute from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Is a conformant processor supposed to raise xml:id or xml:base error if any ? from Norman Walsh
008.[+] Wrapping of nodes into a document from Innovimax SARL on 22-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Alex Milowski
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Innovimax SARL
[+]  [closed] Re: Wrapping of nodes into a document from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Michael Kay
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from mozer
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from mozer
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Jeni Tennison
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Dave Pawson
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Michael Kay
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Norman Walsh
[+]  Rewording about infosets from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Norman Walsh
[+]  Saxonica Comment 7 on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comment 7 on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comment 7 on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: Saxonica Comment 7 on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Norman Walsh
[+]  Comment 30, Parameter inputs as strings (was Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2) from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: Comment 30, Parameter inputs as strings (was Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2) from Michael Kay
[+]  [closed] Re: Comment 30, Parameter inputs as strings from Norman Walsh
[+]  [closed] Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and 2 from Norman Walsh
006.[+] <input> for <pipeline> from Richard Tobin on 21-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> (action A-87-01) from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> (action A-87-01) from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> (action A-87-01) from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> (action A-87-01) from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> (action A-87-01) from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> (action A-87-01) from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: <input> for <pipeline> (action A-87-01) from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: <input> for <pipeline> from Norman Walsh
005.[+] pipeline library from Rui Lopes on 21-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: pipeline library from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: pipeline library from Rui Lopes
[+]  Re: pipeline library from Alessandro Vernet
[+]  [closed] Re: pipeline library from Norman Walsh
004.[+] Scope of step names from Richard Tobin on 20-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: Scope of step names from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: Scope of step names from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: Scope of step names from Norman Walsh
003.[+] Bugs in example files from Richard Tobin on 19-Sep-2007
[+]  [closed] Re: Bugs in example files from Norman Walsh
002.[+] viewport from Richard Tobin on 19-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: viewport from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: viewport from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: viewport from Richard Tobin
[+]  Re: viewport from Innovimax SARL
[+]  Re: viewport from Richard Tobin
[+]  [closed] Re: viewport from Norman Walsh
001.[+] An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov on 17-Sep-2007
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from mozer
[+]  RE: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  RE: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Henry S. Thompson
[+]  RE: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  RE: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  [closed] Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Vasil Rangelov
[+]  Re: [closed] Re: An unfulfilled requirement maybe? from Norman Walsh