See Understanding Techniques for WCAG Success Criteria for important information about the usage of these informative techniques and how they relate to the normative WCAG 2.0 success criteria. The Applicability section explains the scope of the technique, and the presence of techniques for a specific technology does not imply that the technology can be used in all situations to create content that meets WCAG 2.0.
All technologies.
This failure relates to:
The objective of this technique is to describe how using white space characters, such as space, tab, line break, or carriage return, to format tables in text content is a failure to use structure properly. When tables are created in this manner there is no way to indicate that a cell is intended to be a header cell, no way to associate the table header cells with the table data cells, or to navigate directly to a particular cell in a table.
In addition, assistive technologies will interpret content in the reading order of the current language. Using white space to organize data in a visual table does not provide the information in a natural reading order in the source of the document. Thus, the assistive technology user will not be presented with the information in a logical reading order.
Plain text is not suitable for displaying complex information like tables because the structure of the table cannot be perceived. Rather than using visual formatting to represent tabular relations, tabular information would need to be presented using a different technology or presented linearly. (See Presenting tabular information in plain text)
The following example incorrectly uses white space to format a Menu as a visual table.
Example Code:
Menu
Breakfast Lunch Dinner
Monday 2 fried eggs tomato soup garden salad
bacon hamburger Fried Chicken
toast onion rings green beans
Oatmeal cookie mashed potatoes
Tuesday Pancakes vegetable soup Caesar salad
sausage hot dogs Spaghetti with meatballs
orange juice potato salad Italian bread
brownie ice cream
If this table was to be interpreted and spoken by a screen reader it would speak the following lines:
Menu
Breakfast Lunch Dinner
Monday 2 fried eggs tomato soup garden salad
bacon hamburger Fried Chicken
toast onion rings green beans
Oatmeal cookie mashed potatoes
This reading order does not make sense since there is no structure in the table for the assistive technology to identify it as a table. If the text were reflowed, or changed from a fixed to a variable font, or increased in size until lines no longer fit on the page, similar issues would arise in the visual presentation.
No resources available for this technique.
Examine the document for visually formatted tables.
Check whether the tables are created using white space characters to layout the tabular data.
If step #2 is true, then this failure condition applies and the content fails these Success Criteria.