W3C

SOAP Version 1.2 Specification Assertions and Test Collection

W3C Working Draft 26 June 2002

This version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-testcollection-20020626
Latest version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-testcollection
Editors:
Hugo Haas, W3C
Oisin Hurley, IONA Technologies
Anish Karmarkar, Oracle Corp.
Jeff Mischkinsky, Oracle Corp.
Mark Jones, AT&T
Lynne Thompson, Unisys
Richard Martin, Active Data Exchange

Abstract

This document draws on assertions found in the SOAP Version 1.2 specifications [1], [2], and provides a set of tests in order to show whether the assertions are implemented in a SOAP processor.

A SOAP 1.2 implementation that passes all of the tests specified in this document may claim to conform to the SOAP 1.2 Test Suite, 2002/06/26. It is incorrect to claim to be compliant with the SOAP Version 1.2 specifications merely by passing successfully all the tests provided in this test suite. It is also incorrect to claim that an implementation is non complaint with the SOAP Version 1.2 specifications based on its failure to pass one or more of the tests in this test suite.

Status of this Document

This section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. The latest status of this document series is maintained at the W3C.

This is the Last Call W3C Working Draft of the SOAP Version 1.2 Specification Assertions and Test Collection for review by by W3C members and other interested parties. It has been produced by the XML Protocol Working Group (WG), which is part of the Web Services Activity. This version is based on the W3C Working Draft 26 June 2002 of the SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1 and Part 2 specifications. In the event of any discrepancy between the assertions in this document and Parts 1 and 2 of the specification, then the specification is considered to be authoritative.

The WG intends to publish this document as part of its eventual recommendation, to facilitate testing of SOAP implementations. In addition to soliciting feedback on its utility for that purpose, this document serves to identify the specific features of SOAP for which interoperable implementations will be shown prior to requesting Proposed Recommendation. The Working Group maintains a list of SOAP 1.2 implementations for the purpose of tracking implementation of these features.

Following completion of Last Call, the XML Protocol Working Group has agreed to advance the specification according to four exit criteria:

  1. Sufficient reports of implementation experience have been gathered to demonstrate that SOAP processors based on the specification are implementable and have compatible behavior.

  2. An implementation report shows that there are at least two different and interoperable implementations of every mandatory and optional feature.

  3. Formal responses to all comments received by the Working Group.

  4. If these criteria are met, the specification will advance to Proposed Recommendation. If the implementation exit criteria are not met then the specification will enter a Candidate Recommendation phase to ensure they are met.

A list of open Last Call issues against this document can be found at http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.

Comments on this document should be sent to xmlp-comments@w3.org (public archive [5]). It is inappropriate to send discussion email to this address. Comments should be sent during the last call review period, which ends 19 July 2002

Discussion of this document takes place on the public xml-dist-app@w3.org mailing list [4] under the email communication rules in the XML Protocol Working Group Charter [3].

Patent disclosures relevant to this specification may be found on the Working Group's patent disclosure page.

This is a public W3C Working Draft. It is a draft document and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use W3C Working Drafts as reference material or to cite them as other than "works in progress". A list of all W3C technical reports can be found at http://www.w3.org/TR/.


Short Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. SOAP 1.2 Assertions
3. SOAP 1.2 Test Collection
4. References
A. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)


Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. SOAP 1.2 Assertions
    2.1 SOAP 1.2, Part 1 Assertions
    2.2 SOAP 1.2, Part 2 Assertions
3. SOAP 1.2 Test Collection
    3.1 Introduction
    3.2 Header Blocks Used by the Test Collection
        3.2.1 echoOk
        3.2.2 responseOk
        3.2.3 Ignore
        3.2.4 requiredHeader
        3.2.5 DataHolder
        3.2.6 concatAndForwardEchoOk
        3.2.7 concatAndForwardEchoOkArg1
        3.2.8 concatAndForwardEchoOkArg2
        3.2.9 validateCountryCode
        3.2.10 validateCountryCodeFault
        3.2.11 echoResolvedRef
        3.2.12 responseResolvedRef
    3.3 Body Blocks Used by the Test Collection
        3.3.1 echoOk
        3.3.2 responseOk
        3.3.3 echoHeader
        3.3.4 echoHeaderResponse
    3.4 RPC Methods/Procedures Used by the Test Collection
        3.4.1 returnVoid
        3.4.2 echoStruct
        3.4.3 echoStructArray
        3.4.4 echoStructAsSimpleTypes
        3.4.5 echoStruct
        3.4.6 echoNestedStruct
        3.4.7 echoNestedArray
        3.4.8 echoFloatArray
        3.4.9 echoStringArray
        3.4.10 echoIntegerArray
        3.4.11 echoBase64
        3.4.12 echoBoolean
        3.4.13 echoDate
        3.4.14 echoDecimal
        3.4.15 echoFloat
        3.4.16 echoString
        3.4.17 countItems
        3.4.18 echoBase64
    3.5 Tests
4. References
    4.1 Normative References
    4.2 Informative References

Appendix

A. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)


1. Introduction

This document draws on assertions found in the SOAP Version 1.2 specifications, and provides a set of tests in order to show whether the assertions are implemented in a SOAP processor. The primary goal of this document is to foster interoperability between different SOAP 1.2 implementations. The document is intended to help implementors to write SOAP processors that comply with SOAP 1.2 specification, and interoperate with other SOAP processors that comply with SOAP 1.2 specification.

A SOAP 1.2 implementation that passes all of the tests specified in this document may claim to conform to the SOAP 1.2 Test Suite $Date 2002/06/26 $.

Even though the purpose of the SOAP 1.2 Test Suite is to facilitate the creation of interoperable implementations, conformance to the SOAP 1.2 Test Suite does not imply conformance to the SOAP 1.2 specifications; there are mandatory requirements of the specifications that are not tested by the suite (as a simple example, SOAP 1.2 requires that every legal value of a role name is accepted, and all illegal ones rejected). An implementation may be said to be SOAP 1.2 conformant if and only if it it satisfies the conformance requirements specified in SOAP 1.2 specifications. The W3C does not at this time provide for any comprehensive means of testing for such conformance.

Similarly, an implementation may conform to the SOAP 1.2 specifications even if it does not support all capabilities tested by the SOAP 1.2 Test Suite. SOAP 1.2 specifications admits special purpose implementations, such as those in dedicated controllers, which may send and receive only a very limited suite of messages; the requirement is that whatever is done be done correctly. An implementation may conform to the SOAP 1.2 specifications even if it does not support all capabilities tested by the SOAP 1.2 Test Suite. The test suite defines higher level application semantics to enable testing and facilitate interoperable implementations. It is not necessary for a SOAP processor to support these higher level semantics to be SOAP 1.2 compliant.

Assertions for SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1 and Part 2 are numbered sequentially (1..n). "Location of the assertion" points the source of the assertion (section or subsection number) in Part 1 or Part 2. Hyperlinks are used to cross-reference to the original specification section/subsection.

Some of the tests in this document use SOAPBuilders interoperability tests as a started point, but have been modified to conform to the SOAP 1.2 specifications.

2. SOAP 1.2 Assertions

2.1 SOAP 1.2, Part 1 Assertions

Assertion 1

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 1.2

Text from the specification

In particular, this document defines the following namespace names:

  • The SOAP envelope has the namespace name "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope" (see 5. SOAP Message Construct).

  • The SOAP Misunderstood element information item has the namespace name "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults" (see 5.4.8 SOAP mustUnderstand Faults).

  • The SOAP Upgrade element information item has the namespace name "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-upgrade" (see 5.4.7 VersionMismatch Faults).

Normative XML Schema [4], [5] documents for these namespace names can be found by dereferencing the namespace names above.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 2

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 1.2

Text from the specification

SOAP does not require that XML Schema processing (assessment or validation) be performed to establish the correctness or 'schema implied' values of element and attribute information items defined by this specification. The values associated with element and attribute information items defined in this specification MUST be carried explicitly in the transmitted SOAP message except where stated otherwise (see 5. SOAP Message Construct).

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 3

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 1.2

Text from the specification

SOAP attribute information items have types described by XML Schema: Datatypes [5]. Unless otherwise stated, all lexical forms are supported for each such attribute, and lexical forms representing the same value in the XML Schema value space are considered equivalent for purposes of SOAP processing.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 4

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 1.4.3

Text from the specification

An ultimate SOAP receiver cannot also be a SOAP intermediary for the same SOAP message (see 2. SOAP Processing Model).

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 5

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.1

Text from the specification

A SOAP node receiving a SOAP message MUST perform processing according to the SOAP processing model as described in this section and in the remainder of this specification.

Comments

This assertion is tested by the entire test collection.

Assertion 6

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.1

Text from the specification

A SOAP node MUST be identified by a URI.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested

Assertion 7

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.2

Text from the specification

The roles assumed by a node MUST be invariant during the processing of an individual SOAP message.

Comments

This assertion cannot be fully tested, as a SOAP node is allowed to process and remove SOAP headers, reinsert them and send them upstream.

Tests

T62

Assertion 8

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.2

Text from the specification

"http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next"

Each SOAP intermediary and ultimate SOAP receiver MUST act in this role and MAY additionally assume zero or more other SOAP roles.

Tests

T1, T17, T66, T67, T68, T74, T75, TH4

Assertion 9

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.2

Text from the specification

"http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none"

SOAP nodes MUST NOT act in this role.

Tests

T8, T18, T19

Assertion 10

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.2

Text from the specification

"http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver"

To establish itself as an ultimate SOAP receiver a SOAP node MUST act in this role. SOAP intermediaries MUST NOT act in this role.

Tests

T36, T37, T78, T79

Assertion 11

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.2

Text from the specification

While the purpose of a SOAP role name is to identify a SOAP node, there are no routing or message exchange semantics associated with the SOAP role name.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 12

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.3

Text from the specification

A SOAP header block MAY carry a role attribute information item (see 5.2.2 SOAP role Attribute) that is used to target the header block at SOAP nodes operating in the specified role. This specification refers to the value of the SOAP role attribute as the SOAP role for the corresponding SOAP header block.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use the role attribute test this assertion.

Assertion 13

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.3

Text from the specification

A SOAP header block is said to be targeted to a SOAP node if the SOAP role for the header block is the name of a role played by the SOAP node.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use the role attribute test this assertion.

Assertion 14

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.3

Text from the specification

Header blocks targeted to the special role "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none" are carried with the message to the ultimate SOAP receiver(s), but are never formally processed. Such blocks MAY carry data that is required for processing of other blocks.

Tests

T8, T18, T19

Assertion 15

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.4

Text from the specification

A SOAP header block is said to be understood by a SOAP node if the software at that SOAP node has been written to fully conform to and implement the semantics conveyed by the combination of local name and namespace name of the outer-most element information item of that header block.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that uses headers test this assertion.

Assertion 16

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.4

Text from the specification

SOAP header blocks MAY carry mustUnderstand attribute information items (see 5.2.3 SOAP mustUnderstand Attribute). When the value of such an attribute information item is "true", the SOAP block is said to be mandatory.

Mandatory SOAP header blocks are presumed to somehow modify the semantics of other headers or body elements. Therefore, for every mandatory SOAP header block targeted to a node, that node MUST either process the header block or not process the SOAP message at all, and instead generate a fault (see 2.6 Processing SOAP Messages and 5.4 SOAP Fault).

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use mustUnderstand attribute will test this assertion.

Assertion 17

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.4

Text from the specification

This specification therefore does not require any fault to be generated based on the presence or value of the mustUnderstand attribute information item on a SOAP header block not targeted at the current processing node. In particular, it is not an error for an ultimate SOAP receiver to receive a message containing a mandatory header block that is targeted at a role other than the ones assumed by the ultimate SOAP receiver.

Tests

T15, T19

Assertion 18

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.5

Text from the specification

An ultimate SOAP receiver MUST correctly process the immediate children of the SOAP body (see 5.3 SOAP Body).

Comments

All tests in the test collection that have body block(s) and do not generate a fault test this assertion.

Assertion 19

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.6

Text from the specification

Unless otherwise stated, processing MUST be semantically equivalent to performing the following steps separately, and in the order given. Note however that nothing in this specification prevents the use of optimistic concurrency, roll back, or other techniques that might provide increased flexibility in processing order as long as all generated SOAP messages, SOAP faults and application-level side effects are equivalent to those that would be obtained by direct implementation of the following rules in the order shown below.

  1. Determine the set of roles in which the node is to act. The contents of the SOAP envelope, including any header blocks and the body, MAY be inspected in making such determination.

  2. Identify all header blocks targeted at the node that are mandatory.

  3. If one or more of the header blocks identified in the preceding step are not understood by the node then generate a single SOAP fault with the Value of Code set to "env:MustUnderstand" (see 5.4.8 SOAP mustUnderstand Faults). If such a fault is generated, any further processing MUST NOT be done. Faults relating to the contents of the body MUST NOT be generated in this step.

  4. Process all header blocks targeted at the node and, in the case of an ultimate SOAP receiver, the SOAP body. A SOAP node MUST process all SOAP header blocks targeted at it. A SOAP node MAY choose to ignore the application level processing specified by non-mandatory SOAP header blocks targeted at it.

  5. In the case of a SOAP intermediary, and where the message is to be forwarded further along the message path, remove all SOAP header blocks targeted at the node, and possibly insert new SOAP header blocks.

Comments

All tests in the test collection test this assertion.

Assertion 20

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.6

Text from the specification

In all cases where a SOAP header block is processed, the SOAP node MUST understand the SOAP block and MUST do such processing in a manner fully conformant with the specification for that block.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that process a soap header without generating a fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 21

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.6

Text from the specification

An ultimate SOAP receiver MUST process the SOAP body, in a manner consistent with 2.5 Structure and Interpretation of SOAP Bodies.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that have body block(s) test this assertion.

Assertion 22

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.6

Text from the specification

Failure is indicated by the generation of a fault (see 5.4 SOAP Fault). SOAP message processing MAY result in the generation of at-most one fault.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate a fault test this assertion.

Assertion 23

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.6

Text from the specification

Header-related faults other than those related to understanding header blocks (see 2.4 Understanding SOAP Headers) MUST conform to the specification for the corresponding SOAP header block.

Tests

T63

Assertion 24

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.7.1

Text from the specification

Forwarding intermediaries MUST process the message according to the SOAP processing model defined in 2.6 Processing SOAP Messages. They MUST also remove from the message all SOAP header blocks targeted to them, prior to forwarding, regardless of whether these blocks were processed or ignored.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use Node B.

Assertion 25

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.7.1

Text from the specification

In addition, forwarding intermediaries MUST also obey the specification for the SOAP forwarding feature being used. The specification for such a feature MUST describe the required semantics, including the rules describing how the forwarded message is constructed.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 26

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.8

Text from the specification

A SOAP node must determine whether it supports the version of a SOAP message on a per message basis.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 27

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.8

Text from the specification

A SOAP node MAY support multiple envelope versions. However, when processing a message, a SOAP node MUST use the semantics defined by the version of that message.

Tests

T34

Assertion 28

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 2.8

Text from the specification

If a SOAP node receives a message whose version is not supported it MUST generate a fault (see 5.4 SOAP Fault) with a Value of Code set to "env:VersionMismatch". Any other malformation of the message construct MUST result in the generation of a fault with a Value of Code set to "env:Sender".

Tests

T24, T30, TH3, T14, T20, T28, T69, T70, T71, T72, TH2

Assertion 29

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 3.1.1

Text from the specification

The specification of a feature MUST include the following:

  1. The information (state) required at each node to implement the feature.

  2. The processing required at each node in order to fulfill the obligations of the feature including any handling of communication failures that might occur in the underlying protocol (see also 4.2 Binding Framework).

  3. The information to be transmitted from node to node.

  4. In the case of MEPs:

    1. Any requirements to generate additional messages (such as responses to requests in a request/response MEP).

    2. Rules for the delivery or other disposition of SOAP faults generated during the operation of the MEP.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested. HTTP binding in SOAP 1.2 part 2 is a test for this assertion.

Assertion 30

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 3.2

Text from the specification

A module specification follows the following rules. It:

  1. MUST identify itself with a URI. This enables the module to be unambiguously referenced in description languages or during negotiation.

  2. MUST clearly and completely specify the content and semantics of the header blocks used to implement the behavior in question, including if appropriate any modifications to the SOAP Processing model.

  3. MAY utilize the property conventions defined in Part 2 [1], section A Convention for Describing Features and Bindings, in describing the functionality that the module provides. If these conventions are followed, the module specification MUST clearly describe the relationship between the abstract properties and their representations in the SOAP envelope. Note that it is possible to write a feature specification purely in terms of abstract properties, and then write a separate module specification which implements that feature, mapping the properties defined in the feature specification to SOAP header blocks in the module.

  4. MUST clearly specify any known interactions with or changes to the interpretation of the SOAP body. Furthermore, it MUST clearly specify any known interactions with or changes to the interpretation of other SOAP features (whether or not those features are themselves modules).

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 31

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 4

Text from the specification

A binding does not provide a separate processing model and does not constitute a SOAP node by itself.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 32

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 4.2

Text from the specification

A binding specification MUST enable one or more MEP.

Comments

HTTP binding specified in SOAP 1.2 part 2 enables an MEP. This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 33

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 4.2

Text from the specification

In cases where multiple features are supported by a binding specification the specifications for those features MUST provide any information necessary for their successful use in combination; this binding framework does not provide any explicit mechanism for ensuring such compatibility of multiple features.

Comments

HTTP binding specified in SOAP 1.2 part 2 enables an MEP. This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 34

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 4.2

Text from the specification

As described in 5. SOAP Message Construct, each SOAP message is modeled as an XML Infoset that consists of a document information item with exactly one child: the envelope element information item.

Comments

All tests in the test collection test this assertion.

Assertion 35

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 4.2

Text from the specification

Therefore, the minimum responsibility of a binding in transmitting a message is to specify the means by which the SOAP XML Infoset is transferred to and reconstituted by the binding at the receiving SOAP node and to specify the manner in which the transmission of the envelope is effected using the facilities of the underlying protocol.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 36

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 4.2

Text from the specification

The binding framework does NOT require that every binding use the XML 1.0 [8] serialization as the "on the wire" representation of the Infoset; compressed, encrypted, fragmented representations and so on can be used if appropriate.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 37

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 4.2

Text from the specification

Section 5. SOAP Message Construct provides that the XML Infoset of a SOAP message MUST NOT include a DTD. Accordingly, a binding that uses the XML 1.0 serialization MUST NOT transmit a DTD; a binding that accepts XML 1.0 serializations MUST fault in a binding specific manner if an XML 1.0 serialization corresponding to a DTD for the SOAP message is received.

Tests

T25

Assertion 38

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 4.2

Text from the specification

Although streaming SOAP receivers will acquire such Infosets incrementally, SOAP processing MUST yield results identical to those that would have been achieved if the entire SOAP envelope were available prior to the start of processing.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 39

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5

Text from the specification

A SOAP message is specified as an XML Infoset that consists of a document information item with exactly one member in its [children] property, which MUST be the SOAP Envelope element information item (see 5.1 SOAP Envelope). This element information item is also the value of the [document element] property.

Comments

All tests in the test collection test this assertion.

Assertion 40

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5

Text from the specification

The [notations] and [unparsed entities] properties are both empty. The [base URI], [character encoding scheme] and [version] properties may have any legal value. The [standalone] property either has a value of "true" or has no value.

Tests

T64, T25, T65, T66, T67

Assertion 41

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5

Text from the specification

The XML infoset of a SOAP message MUST NOT contain a document type declaration information item.

Tests

T25

Assertion 42

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5

Text from the specification

A SOAP message SHOULD NOT contain processing instruction information items. A SOAP receiver MUST ignore processing instruction information items in SOAP messages that it receives.

Tests

T26

Assertion 43

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5

Text from the specification

Element information items defined by this specification may have zero or more character information item children whose character code is amongst the whitespace characters as defined by [8]. Unless otherwise indicated, such character information items are considered insignificant. A SOAP receiver MUST ignore such insignificant character information items.

Tests

T68

Assertion 44

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.1

Text from the specification

The Envelope element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Envelope .

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope".

  • Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items amongst its [attributes] property.

  • One or two element information items in its [children] property in order as follows:

    1. An optional Header element information item (see 5.2 SOAP Header).

    2. A mandatory Body element information item (see 5.3 SOAP Body).

Comments

All the tests in the test collection test this assertion.

Assertion 45

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.1.1

Text from the specification

The encodingStyle attribute information item has:

  • A [local name] of encodingStyle .

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope".

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use encodingSytle attribute test this assertion.

Assertion 46

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.1.1

Text from the specification

The encodingStyle attribute information item MAY only appear on:

  1. A SOAP header block (see 5.2.1 SOAP header block).

  2. A child element information item of the SOAP Body element information item (see 5.3.1 SOAP Body child Element).

  3. A child element information item of the SOAP Detail element information item (see 5.4.5.1 SOAP detail entry).

  4. Any descendent of 1, 2, and 3 above.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use encodingSytle attribute test this assertion.

Assertion 47

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.1.1

Text from the specification

The scope of the encodingStyle attribute information item is that of its owner element information item and that element information item's descendants, unless a descendant itself carries such an attribute information item.

Tests

T73

Assertion 48

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.1.1

Text from the specification

If no encodingStyle attribute information item is in scope for a particular element information item or the value of such an attribute information item is the zero-length URI ("") then no claims are made regarding the encoding style of that element information item and its descendants.

Tests

T73

Assertion 49

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.1.1

Text from the specification

The encodingStyle attribute information item is of type anyURI in the namespace http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema

Comments

All the tests in the test collection that use encodingStyle, test this assertion.

Assertion 50

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2

Text from the specification

The Header element information item has:

  • A local name of Header

  • A namespace name of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope

  • Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information item children.

  • Zero or more namespace qualified element information item children.

Comments

All the tests in the test collection that use headers, test this assertion.

Assertion 51

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.1

Text from the specification

Each SOAP header block element information item:

  • MUST have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that is, MUST be namespace qualified.

  • MAY have any number of character information item children. Child character information items whose character code is amongst the whitespace characters as defined by [8] are considered significant.

  • MAY have an encodingStyle attribute information item in its [attributes] property.

  • MAY have an role attribute information item in its [attributes] property.

  • MAY have a mustUnderstand attribute information item in its [attributes] property.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use headers, test this assertion.

Assertion 52

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.1

Text from the specification

The SOAP header block attribute information items defined later in 5.2.2 SOAP role Attribute and 5.2.3 SOAP mustUnderstand Attribute affect the processing of SOAP messages by SOAP receivers (see 2. SOAP Processing Model). A SOAP sender generating a SOAP message SHOULD use these attributes only on SOAP header block. A SOAP receiver MUST ignore these attribute information items if they appear on descendants of a SOAP header block or on a SOAP body child element information item (or its descendents).

Tests

T74

Assertion 53

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.2

Text from the specification

The role attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of role .

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope".

  • A [specified] property with a value of "true".

The type of the role attribute information item is anyURI in the namespace named "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The value of the role attribute information item is a URI that names a role that a SOAP node may assume.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use roles, will test this assertion.

Assertion 54

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.2

Text from the specification

Omitting the SOAP role attribute information item is equivalent to supplying that attribute with a value of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver".

Tests

T3, T22, T32, T34, T35, T56, T57

Assertion 55

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.2

Text from the specification

An empty value for this attribute is equivalent to omitting the attribute completely, i.e. targeting the block at an ultimate SOAP receiver.

Comments

'this' in the specification text refers to the role attribute information item.

Tests

T4, T9, T10, T11, T12, T13, T14, T40, T73

Assertion 56

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.2

Text from the specification

SOAP senders SHOULD NOT generate, but SOAP receivers MUST accept the SOAP role attribute information item with a value of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver" (see 1.2.2 Robustness Principle).

Tests

T36, T37

Assertion 57

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.3

Text from the specification

The mustUnderstand attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of mustUnderstand .

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope".

  • A [specified] property with a value of "true".

The type of the mustUnderstand attribute information item is boolean in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use mustUnderstand attribute, test this assertion.

Assertion 58

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.3

Text from the specification

Omitting this attribute information item is defined as being semantically equivalent to including it with a value of "false" or "0".

Comments

'this' in the specification text refers to the mustUnderstand attribute information item.

Tests

T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T9, T10, T18, T29, T37, T56, T57, T66, T67, T68, T74, T76

Assertion 59

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.3

Text from the specification

SOAP senders SHOULD NOT generate, but SOAP receivers MUST accept the SOAP mustUnderstand attribute information item with a value of "false" or "0" (see section 1.2.2 Robustness Principle).

Tests

T11, T38, T40,

Assertion 60

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.2.3

Text from the specification

A SOAP receiver MUST accept any valid lexical representation of the attribute value.

Comments

The attribute mentioned in the spec text refers to env:mustUnderstand.

Tests

T11, T12, T13, T15, T16, T17, T19, T21, T22, T32, T35, T36, T38, T40, T62, T63, T74, T75, TH4

Assertion 61

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.3

Text from the specification

The Body element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Body .

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope".

  • Zero or more namespace qualified attribute information items in its [attributes] property.

  • Zero or more namespace qualified element information items in its [children] property.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that have the Body element, test this assertion.

Assertion 62

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.3.1

Text from the specification

All child element information items of the SOAP Body element information item:

  • MUST have a [namespace name] property which has a value, that is, be namespace qualified.

  • MAY have an encodingStyle attribute information item in their [attributes] property.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that have the body blocks, test this

Assertion 63

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4

Text from the specification

The Fault element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Fault .

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope".

  • Two or more child element information items in its [children] property in order as follows:

    1. A mandatory Code element information item (see 5.4.1 SOAP Code Element).

    2. A mandatory Reason element information item (see 5.4.2 SOAP Reason Element).

    3. An optional Node element information item (see 5.4.3 SOAP Node Element).

    4. An optional Role element information item (see 5.4.4 SOAP Role Element).

    5. An optional Detail element information item (see 5.4.5 SOAP Detail Element).

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 64

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4

Text from the specification

To be recognized as carrying SOAP error information, a SOAP message MUST contain a single SOAP Fault element information item as the only child of the SOAP Body .

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 65

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4

Text from the specification

When generating a fault, SOAP senders MUST NOT include additional element information items in the SOAP Body. A message whose Body contains a Fault plus additional element information items has no SOAP-defined semantics.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 66

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.1

Text from the specification

The Code element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Code .

  • A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope .

  • One or two child element information items in its [children] property, in order, as follows:

    1. A mandatory Value element information item as described below (see 5.4.1.1 SOAP Value element (with Code parent))

    2. An optional Subcode element information item as described below (see 5.4.1.2 SOAP Subcode element).

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 67

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.1.1

Text from the specification

The Value element information item has;

  • A [local name] of Value .

  • A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope .

The type of the Value element information item is faultCodeEnum in the "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope" namespace.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 68

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.1.2

Text from the specification

The Subcode element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Subcode .

  • A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope .

  • One or two child element information items in its [children] property, in order, as follows:

    1. A mandatory Value element information item as described below (see 5.4.1.3 SOAP Value element (with Subcode parent)).

    2. An optional Subcode element information item (see 5.4.1.2 SOAP Subcode element).

Tests

T33, T80

Assertion 69

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.1.3

Text from the specification

The Value element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Value .

  • A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope .

The type of the Value element information item is XML qualified name in the "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" namespace.

Tests

T33, T80

Assertion 70

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.2

Text from the specification

The Reason element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Reason .

  • A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope .

  • An optional attribute information item with a [local name] of lang and [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" (see [8], Language Identification).

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 71

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.2

Text from the specification

The type of the Reason element information item is string in the "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" namespace.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 72

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.3

Text from the specification

The Node element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Node .

  • A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope .

Tests

T21

Assertion 73

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.3

Text from the specification

SOAP nodes that do not act as the ultimate SOAP receiver MUST include this element information item.

Comments

The element information item in the specification text refers to the 'Node' element.

Tests

T21

Assertion 74

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.4

Text from the specification

The Role element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Role .

  • A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope .

The type of the Role element information item is anyURI in the "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" namespace.

Tests

T21, TH4

Assertion 75

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.5

Text from the specification

The Detail element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Detail .

  • A [namespace name] of http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope .

  • Zero or more attribute information items in its [attributes] property.

  • Zero or more child element information items in its [children] property.

Tests

T27, T28, T58

Assertion 76

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.5

Text from the specification

The Detail element information item MUST be present when the contents of the SOAP Body could not be processed successfully. It MUST NOT be used to carry error information about any SOAP header blocks.

Tests

T27, T28, T58

Assertion 77

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.5

Text from the specification

Detailed error information for SOAP header blocks MUST be carried within the SOAP header blocks themselves.

Tests

T12, T13, T16, T17, T21, T35, T36, T63, TH4

Assertion 78

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.6

Text from the specification

The values of the Value child element information item of the Code element information item are restricted to those in Table 2. Additional fault subcodes MAY be created for use by applications or features. Such subcodes are carried in the Value child element information item of the Subcode element information item.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that generate fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 79

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.7

Text from the specification

The Upgrade element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Upgrade .

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-upgrade".

  • One or more envelope element information items in its [children] property as described below:

The envelope element information item has:

  • A [local name] of envelope .

  • A [namespace name] which has no value.

  • An unqualified attribute information item with a local name of qname and a type of QName in the "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" namespace.

Tests

T30, TH3

Assertion 80

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 5.4.8

Text from the specification

A SOAP node MAY generate a SOAP fault for any one or more SOAP header blocks that were not understood in a SOAP message. It is NOT a requirement that the fault contain the qualified names of ALL such header blocks.

Each such header block element information item has:

  • A [local name] of Misunderstood .

  • A [namespace name] of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults".

  • A qname attribute information item in its [attributes] property as described below.

The qname attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

  • A [local name] of qname .

  • A [namespace name] which has no value.

  • A [specified] property with a value of "true".

The type of the qname attribute information item is QName in the "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" namespace. Its value is the XML qualified name of a header block which the faulting node failed to understand.

Tests

T12, T13, T16, T17, T21, T35, T36, TH4,

Assertion 81

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 6

Text from the specification

SOAP does not define a base URI but relies on the mechanisms defined in XML Base[11] and RFC 2396[6] for establishing a base URI against which relative URIs can be made absolute.

Tests

T75

Assertion 82

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 6

Text from the specification

The use of IP addresses in URIs SHOULD be avoided whenever possible (see RFC 1900 [18]. However, when used, the literal format for IPv6 addresses in URIs as described by RFC 2732 [12] SHOULD be supported.

Tests

T40

Assertion 83

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Section 6

Text from the specification

SOAP does not place any a priori limit on the length of a URI. Any SOAP node MUST be able to handle the length of any URI that it publishes and both SOAP senders and SOAP receivers SHOULD be able to deal with URIs of at least 2048 characters in length.

Tests

T29

Assertion 84

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Appendix A

Text from the specification

A SOAP/1.1 node receiving a SOAP Version 1.2 message will according to SOAP/1.1 generate a version mismatch SOAP fault based on a SOAP/1.1 message construct. That is, the envelope will have a local name of Envelope and a namespace name of "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/".

Comments

Since this assertion is about the behavior of SOAP 1.1 compliant SOAP node, the test collection does not test this assertion.

Assertion 85

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 1, Appendix A

Text from the specification

A SOAP Version 1.2 node receiving a SOAP/1.1 message either:

  • MAY process the message as a SOAP/1.1 message (if supported), or

  • MUST generate a version mismatch SOAP fault based on a SOAP/1.1 message construct following SOAP/1.1 semantics. The SOAP fault SHOULD include an Upgrade header block as defined in this specification (see 5.4.7 VersionMismatch Faults) indicating support for SOAP Version 1.2. This allows a receiving SOAP/1.1 node to correctly interpret the SOAP fault generated by the SOAP Version 1.2 node.

Tests

T30

2.2 SOAP 1.2, Part 2 Assertions

Assertion 86

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1

Text from the specification

When serializing a graph for transmission inside a SOAP message any representation that deserializes to the identical graph MAY be used; when receiving an encoded SOAP message, all representations MUST be accepted.

Tests

T76

Assertion 87

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.1

Text from the specification

Each graph edge is encoded as an element information item and each element information item represents a graph edge.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use soap encoding, will test this assertion.

Assertion 88

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.1

Text from the specification

The graph node at which an edge terminates is determined as follows:

  1. If the element information item representing the edge does not have a ref attribute information item (see 3.1.5.2 ref Attribute Information Item) amongst its attributes then that element information item is said to represent a node in the graph and the edge terminates at that node.

  2. If the element information item representing the edge does have a ref attribute information item (see 3.1.5.2 ref Attribute Information Item) among its attributes, then the value of that attribute information item MUST be identical to the value of exactly one id attribute information item ( see 3.1.5.1 id Attribute Information Item ) in the same envelope. In this case the edge terminates at the graph node represented by the element information item on which the id attribute information item appears. That element information item MUST be in the scope of an encodingStyle attribute with a value of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding".

All nodes in the graph are encoded as described in 1 above. Additional inbound edges for multi reference graph nodes are encoded as described in 2 above.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use soap encoding and do not return a fault, test this assertion.

Assertion 89

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.2

Text from the specification

The "lexical value" of a terminal graph node is the sequence of Unicode characters identified by the character information item children of the element information item representing that node.

Tests

T41, T42, T43, T44, T45, T46, T47, T48, T49, T50, T51, T52, T53, T54, T55

Assertion 90

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.3

Text from the specification

An outbound edge of a graph node is encoded as an element information item child of the element information item that represents the node (see 3.1.1 Encoding graph edges and nodes).

Tests

T41, T42, T43, T44, T45, T46

Assertion 91

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.3

Text from the specification

For a graph edge which is distinguished by label ( "struct" or "generic" ), the namespace name property of the element information item determines whether the edge label is globally or locally scoped:

  • If the namespace name is empty then the edge label is locally scoped.

  • If the namespace name is not empty then the edge label is globally scoped. The namespace name is the URI part of the edge label.

The interpretation of the local name property of the element information item with respect to the edge label is as follows:

  • If the edge label is locally scoped, the edge label is the same as the local name. (see A. Mapping Application Defined Names to XML Names).

  • If the edge label is globally scoped, the non-URI part of the edge label is the local name. (see A. Mapping Application Defined Names to XML Names).

Tests

T41, T42, T43, T44, T45, T46

Assertion 92

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.3

Text from the specification

For a graph edge which is distinguished by position ( "array" or "generic" ):

  • The ordinal position of the graph edge corresponds to the position of the element information item relative to its siblings

  • If outbound edges are distinguished only by position ("array") then the local name and namespace name properties of the element information item are not significant.

Tests

T46, T47, T48, T49, T50

Assertion 93

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.3

Text from the specification

The following rules apply to the encoding of a graph node that represents an "array":

  • The element information item representing an array node MAY have amongst its attributes an itemType attribute information item (see 3.1.4.1 itemType Attribute Information Item).

  • The element information item representing an array node MAY have amongst its attributes an arraySize attribute information item (see 3.1.6 arraySize Attribute Information Item).

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use arrays, will test this assertion

Assertion 94

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.3

Text from the specification

If a graph edge does not terminate in a graph node then it can either be omitted from the serialization or it can be encoded as an element information item with an xsi:nil attribute information item.

Tests

T77

Assertion 95

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.4

Text from the specification

The type name property of a graph node is a {namespace name, local name} pair computed as follows:

  1. If the element information item representing the graph node has an xsi:type attribute information item amongst its attributes then the type name property of the graph node is the value of the xsi:type attribute information item.

  2. Otherwise if the parent element information item of the element information item representing the graph node has a "enc:itemType" attribute information item (see 3.1.4.1 itemType Attribute Information Item) amongst its attributes then the type name property of the graph node is the value of the "enc:itemType" attribute information item

  3. Otherwise the value of the type name property of the graph node is unspecified.

Comments

All encoding tests in the test collection, test this assertion.

Assertion 96

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.4.1

Text from the specification

The itemType attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

  • A local name of itemType ;

  • A namespace name of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding".

  • A specified property with a value of true.

The type of the itemType attribute information item is QName in the namespace named "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The value of the itemType attribute information item is used to compute the type name property (see 3.1.4 Computing the Type Name property) of members of an array.

Tests

T27, T42, T46, T47, T48, T50, T58, T59, T60, T61

Assertion 97

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.5.1

Text from the specification

The id attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

  • A local name of id ;

  • A namespace name which is empty

  • A specified property with a value of "true".

The type of the id attribute information item is ID in the namespace named "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The value of the id attribute information item is a unique identifier that can be referred to by a ref attribute information item (see 3.1.5.2 ref Attribute Information Item).

Tests

T56, T57, T76

Assertion 98

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.5.2

Text from the specification

The ref attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

  • A local name of ref ;

  • A namespace name which is empty

  • A specified property with a value of true.

The type of the ref attribute information item is IDREF in the namespace named "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The value of the ref attribute information item is a reference to a unique identifier defined by an id attribute information item (see 3.1.5.1 id Attribute Information Item).

Tests

T56, T57, T76

Assertion 99

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.5.3

Text from the specification

The value of a ref attribute information item MUST also be the value of exactly one id attribute information item.

Tests

T56, T57, T76

Assertion 100

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.5.3

Text from the specification

A ref attribute information item and an id attribute information item MUST NOT appear on the same element information item.

Tests

T59

Assertion 101

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.1.6

Text from the specification

The arraySize attribute information item has the following Infoset properties:

  • A local name of arraySize ;

  • A namespace name of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding".

  • A default value of "*"

The type of the arraySize attribute information item is arraySize in the namespace named "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding".

The value of the arraySize attribute information item MUST conform to the following EBNF grammar Value of enc:arraySize

[1]   arraySizeValue   ::=   ("*" | concreteSize) nextConcreteSize*
[2]   nextConcreteSize   ::=   " " concreteSize
[3]   concreteSize   ::=   [0-9]+

The array's dimensions are represented by each item in the list of sizes (unspecified size in case of the asterisk). The number of items in the list represents the number of dimensions in the array. The asterisk, if present, MUST only appear in the first position in the list.

Tests

T42, T46, T47, T48, T49, T50, T58, T60, T61

Assertion 102

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 3.2

Text from the specification

During deserialization a SOAP receiver:

  • SHOULD generate an env:Sender SOAP fault with a subcode of enc:MissingID if the message violates the constraints on id and ref attribute information items (see 3.1.5.3 Constraints on id and ref attribute information items).

  • MAY generate an env:Sender SOAP fault with a subcode of enc:UntypedValue if the type name property of an encoded graph node is unspecified.

Comments

Add a new test for UntypedValue

Tests

T56, T59

Assertion 103

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 4

Text from the specification

However, use of the SOAP RPC Representation is not limited to the SOAP HTTP Binding (see 7. SOAP HTTP Binding).

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 104

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 4.2.1

Text from the specification

An RPC invocation is modeled as a struct where parameter access is by name or as an array where parameter access is by position.

  • The invocation is represented by a single struct or array containing an outbound edge for each [in] or [in/out] parameter. The struct is named identically to the procedure or method name (see A. Mapping Application Defined Names to XML Names).

  • Each outbound edge either has a label corresponding to the name of the parameter (see A. Mapping Application Defined Names to XML Names) or a position corresponding to the position of the parameter.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use the RPC convention, test this assertion.

Assertion 105

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 4.2.1

Text from the specification

Applications MAY process invocations with missing parameters but also MAY RPC response to contain both a result and a fault.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 106

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 4.2.2

Text from the specification

An RPC response is modeled as a struct where parameter access is by name or as an array where parameter access is by position.

  • The response is represented by a single struct or array containing an outbound edge for the return value and each [out] or [in/out] parameter.

  • If the response is represented by a struct, then each parameter is represented by an outbound edge with a label corresponding to the name of the parameter (see A. Mapping Application Defined Names to XML Names). A non-void return value is represented in the struct by an outbound edge that may be given any unique label. The XML qualified name of the label of the edge representing the return value is given by a separate outbound edge with a local name of result and the namespace name "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc". This result outbound edge MUST be present and hold the qname of the edge containing the return value within any struct response if the return value of the procedure is non-void. This result outbound edge MUST NOT be present if the return value of the procedure is void.

  • If the response is represented by an array, each outbound edge has a label corresponding to the position of the parameter. A return value MUST be present if the return value of the procedure is non-void. If present, the return value MUST be represented as the first edge of the array with parameters following. If no return value is present, then parameters begin with the first outbound edge of the array.

  • Invocation faults are handled according to the rules in 4.3 RPC Faults. If a protocol binding adds additional rules for fault expression, those MUST also be followed.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use the RPC convention and do not generate a fault, test this assertion. Test 'T31' tests the void return case.

Assertion 107

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 4.2.2

Text from the specification

An RPC response MUST NOT contain both a result and a fault, because a result indicates success and a fault indicates failure.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 108

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 4.2.3

Text from the specification

When using SOAP encoding (see 3. SOAP Encoding) in conjunction with the RPC convention described here, the SOAP Body MUST contain only a single child element information item, that child being the serialized RPC invocation or response struct or array. I.e. when using the SOAP encoding for serializing RPC invocations and responses, the encoding is constrained to produce a single tree of element information items.

Comments

All tests in the test collection that use the RPC convention, test this assertion.

Assertion 109

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 4.3

Text from the specification

Additional information relevant to the encoding of an RPC invocation but not part of the formal procedure or method signature MAY be expressed in a SOAP envelope carrying an RPC invocation or response. Such additional information MUST be expressed as SOAP header blocks.

Tests

T32

Assertion 110

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 4.4

Text from the specification

Errors arising during RPC invocations are reported according to the following rules (in decreasing order of precedence):

  1. A fault with a Value of "env:Receiver" for Code SHOULD be generated when the receiver cannot handle the message because of some temporary condition, e.g. when it is out of memory.

  2. A fault with a Value of "env:DataEncodingUnknown" for Code SHOULD be generated when the arguments are encoded in a data encoding unknown to the receiver.

  3. A fault with a Value of "env:Sender" for Code and a Value of "rpc:ProcedureNotPresent" for Subcode MAY be generated when the receiver does not support the procedure or method specified.

  4. A fault with a Value of "env:Sender" for Code and a Value of "rpc:BadArguments" for Subcode MUST be generated when the receiver cannot parse the arguments or when there is a mismatch between what the receiver expects and what the sender has sent.

  5. Other faults arising in an extension or from the application SHOULD be generated as described in [1]SOAP Fault Codes.

Comments

env:Receiver will not be tested by the test collection.

TODO: test for rpc:BadArguments

Tests

T72, T69, T70, T33, T80

Assertion 111

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 5.1.1

Text from the specification

Properties are named with XML qualified names.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 112

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 5.1.1

Text from the specification

Property values are typed, and the type of a property-value is defined by an XML Schema simple datatype in the specification which introduces the property.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 113

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.1

Text from the specification

Table 2: Property definitions supporting the description of MEPs

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 114

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.2.1

Text from the specification

This message exchange pattern is identified by the URI:

  • 'http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap/mep/single-request-response/'

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 115

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.2.3

Text from the specification

Table 4: Instantiation of a Message Exchange Context for a requesting SOAP node

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 116

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.2.3

Text from the specification

Table 5: Instantiation of Message Exchange Context for an inbound request message

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 117

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.2.3

Text from the specification

Table 6: Requesting SOAP Node State Transitions

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 118

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.2.3

Text from the specification

Table 7: Responding SOAP Node State Transitions

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 119

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.2.3

Text from the specification

All the rules in [1]Binding Framework regarding streaming of individual SOAP messages MUST be obeyed for both request and response SOAP messages.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 120

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.2.3

Text from the specification

When using streaming SOAP bindings, requesting SOAP nodes MUST avoid deadlock by accepting and if necessary processing SOAP response information while the SOAP request is being transmitted.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 121

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.3.3

Text from the specification

Table 9: Instantiation of a Message Exchange Context for a requesting SOAP node

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 122

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.3.3

Text from the specification

Table 10: Instantiation of Message Exchange Context for an inbound request message

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 123

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.3.3

Text from the specification

Table 11: Requesting SOAP Node State Transitions

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 124

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.3.3

Text from the specification

Table 12: Responding SOAP Node State Transitions

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 125

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.3.3

Text from the specification

All the rules in [1]Binding Framework regarding streaming of individual SOAP messages MUST be obeyed for both request and response SOAP messages.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 126

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.3.3

Text from the specification

When using streaming SOAP bindings, requesting SOAP nodes MUST avoid deadlock by accepting and if necessary processing SOAP response information while the SOAP request is being transmitted.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 127

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 6.4.3

Text from the specification

A node sending a request message MUST provide a value for the webmeth:Method property.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 128

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 7.1

Text from the specification

Conforming implementations of this binding:

  1. MUST be capable of sending and receiving messages serialized using media type "application/soap+xml" whose proper use and parameters are described in [12].

Comments

'this' in the specification text refer to the SOAP HTTP Binding.

Tests

TH1, TH2, TH3, TH4

Assertion 129

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 7.1

Text from the specification

The SOAP HTTP Binding is optional and SOAP nodes are NOT required to implement it. The SOAP version 1.2 specification does not preclude specifications of other bindings to HTTP or bindings to other protocols. A SOAP node that correctly and completely implements the SOAP HTTP Binding may to be said to "conform to the SOAP 1.2 HTTP Binding."

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 130

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 7.3

Text from the specification

An implementation of the SOAP HTTP Binding MUST support the following message exchange patterns (MEPs):

  • "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap/mep/request-response/" (see 6.2 Request-Response Message Exchange Pattern)

  • "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap/mep/soap-response/" (see 6.3 SOAP Response Message Exchange Pattern)

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 131

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 7.4

Text from the specification

An implementation of the SOAP HTTP Binding MUST support the following feature:

  • "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap/features/web-method/" (see 6.4 Web Method Specification Feature)

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 132

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 7.5.1

Text from the specification

This binding supports streaming and, as a result, requesting SOAP nodes MUST avoid deadlock by accepting and if necessary processing SOAP response information while the SOAP request is being transmitted (see 6.2.3 State Machine Description).

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 133

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 7.5.1.2

Text from the specification

Table 16: State Description: Requesting

Tests

TH1, TH2, TH3, TH4

Assertion 134

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 7.5.1.2

Text from the specification

Table 17: HTTP status codes dependent transitions

Tests

TH1, TH2, TH3, TH4, TH5

Assertion 135

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Section 7.5.2.2

Text from the specification

Table 21: State Description: Receiving

Tests

TH1, TH2, TH3, TH4

Assertion 136

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Appendix A

Text from the specification

Appendix A lists rules to convert a application defined name to an XML name

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

Assertion 137

Location of the assertion

SOAP 1.2 Part 2, Appendix B

Text from the specification

As noted in 3.1.4 Computing the Type Name property SOAP graph nodes are labeled with type names, but validation of encoded SOAP messages MUST NOT be required by conforming processors.

Comments

This assertion will not be tested.

3. SOAP 1.2 Test Collection

3.1 Introduction

All the tests in this test collection follow the following rules:

  • The tests use three SOAP nodes - Node A, Node B and Node C, identified by "http://example.org/ts-tests/A", "http://example.org/ts-tests/B", and "http://example.org/ts-tests/C" respectively. No other SOAP nodes must be used in communication between these three SOAP nodes.

  • Node A is the test client.

  • Node C is the ultimate destination.

  • Node B is a SOAP intermediary.

  • Node B must act in the role "http://example.org/ts-tests/B"

  • Node C must act in the role "http://example.org/ts-tests/C"

  • Node A, Node B and Node C implement some mechanism for routing so that the following messaging scenarios are allowed:

    • Node A sends message to Node C, Node C returns a response or fault message back to Node A (Node B is not involved in this scenario).

    • Node A sends message to Node B, Node B forwards the message to Node C or returns a fault back to Node A. Node C either:

      • returns a fault message to Node B and Node B forwards the fault message to Node A, OR

      • returns a response message to Node B and Node B forwards the response to Node A.

3.2 Header Blocks Used by the Test Collection

Unless otherwise specified the header blocks used by this test collection are in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests". If a header block not listed below is targeted at a Node, that Node must generate a fault with the Value of the fault Code as env:mustUnderstand.

3.2.1 echoOk

The semantics of processing this header block require the SOAP node targeted by this header block, to reply to the SOAP node from which it received the SOAP message containing this header. The reponse SOAP message must contain the header block responseOk containing the same information set as that in echoOk header block. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.2 responseOk

This header block is generated as a result of processing the echoOk header block as described above. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.3 Ignore

The semantics of processing this header block require the SOAP node targeted by this header block, to ignore this header block altogether. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.4 requiredHeader

This header block is used in conjunction with the body block echoHeader The semantics of processing the body block echoHeader requires the SOAP node to reply to the SOAP node from which it received the SOAP message containing this header. The response SOAP message must contain the SOAP body block echoHeaderResponse containing the same information set as that in requiredHeader header block. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.5 DataHolder

The semantics of processing this header block require the SOAP node targeted by this header block, to ignore this header block altogether. This header is used for encapsulating data used by other headers and body blocks. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.6 concatAndForwardEchoOk

The semantics of processing this header block require the SOAP node targeted by this header block, to take the character information item children of the header block concatAndForwardEchoOkArg2 concatenate it to the character information item children of the header block concatAndForwardEchoOkArg1 and forward the result to the downstream SOAP node using the header block echoOK This header should not contain any charater information item children.

3.2.7 concatAndForwardEchoOkArg1

The semantics of processing this header block require the SOAP node targeted by this header block, to ignore this header block altogether. This header is used for encapsulating data used by the header concatAndForwardEchoOk block. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.8 concatAndForwardEchoOkArg2

The semantics of processing this header block require the SOAP node targeted by this header block, to ignore this header block altogether. This header is used for encapsulating data used by the header concatAndForwardEchoOk block. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.9 validateCountryCode

The semantics of processing this header block require the SOAP node targeted by this header block, to validate that the character information item of this header consists of two letters only (ignoring whitespace). If this condition is not satisfied then a fault is required to be sent back to the sender of the message with the Value of the fault Code as env:Sender along with a header block validateCountryCodeFault containing an explanation for the fault The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.10 validateCountryCodeFault

This header block is used to cary information related to fault generated as a result of processing the header block validateCountryCode as described above. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.2.11 echoResolvedRef

The semantics of processing this header block require the SOAP node targeted by this header block, to reply to the SOAP node from which it received the SOAP message containing this header. The reponse SOAP message must contain the header block responseResolvedRef This header block contains one child element information item RelativeReference in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests". RelativeReference element information item is required to have the attribute information items xml:base, and xlink:href. The responseResolvedRef contains the resolved reference pointed to by xml:base and xlink:href.

3.2.12 responseResolvedRef

This header block is generated in response to processing the header block echoResolvedRef as described above. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.3 Body Blocks Used by the Test Collection

Unless otherwise specified the body blocks used by this test collection are in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests". If a body block not listed below is targeted at a Node, that Node must generate a fault.

3.3.1 echoOk

The semantics of processing this body block require the SOAP node to reply to the SOAP node from which it received the SOAP message containing this block. The reponse SOAP message must contain the body block responseOk containing the same information set as that in echoOk body block. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.3.2 responseOk

This body block is generated as a result of processing the echoOk body block as described above. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.3.3 echoHeader

This body block is used in conjuction with the header block requiredHeader The semantics of processing this body block require the SOAP node to reply to the SOAP node from which it received the SOAP message containing this block. The response SOAP message must contain the body block echoHeaderResponse containing the same information set as that in requiredHeader header block. This body block does not have any childern element information items, or attribute information items.

3.3.4 echoHeaderResponse

This body block is generated as a result of processing the echoHeader body block as described above. The type of this header block is string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

3.4 RPC Methods/Procedures Used by the Test Collection

Unless otherwise specified the procedure/method names used by this test collection are in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests". If a RPC procedure/method is not listed below is targeted at a Node, that Node must generate a fault.

In addition to types defined in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema", the test collection uses the following types:

  • SOAPStruct defined in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". This type contains three child element information items in its children property as follows:

    • An element information item of type string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

    • An element information item of type int in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

    • An element information item of type float in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

  • SOAPStructStruct defined in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". This type contains four child element information items in its children property as follows:

    • An element information item of type int in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

    • An element information item of type float in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

    • An element information item of type string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

    • An element information item of type SOAPStruct in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd".

  • SOAPArrayStruct defined in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". This type contains four child element information items in its children property as follows:

    • An element information item of type int in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

    • An element information item of type float in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

    • An element information item of type string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

    • An element information item representing an array of type string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema".

The encoding represented by the URI "http://example.org/PoisonEncoding" is an encoding that is not recognized by any of the SOAP nodes.

Some of the tests in this test collection, test SOAP 1.2 HTTP binding. The request and response messages for these tests contain HTTP start-line (request-line or status-line), HTTP headers required by the bindings and the XML payload. Additional HTTP headers can be generated in accordance with the rules for the binding specific expression of any optional features in use for this message exchange. In the tests, the value of the 'Content-Length' and 'Host' header should be replaced with an appropriate value.

3.4.1 returnVoid

This procedure/method does not have any input and output parameters and does not have a return value.

3.4.2 echoStruct

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type SOAPStruct in the name space "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.3 echoStructArray

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type array of SOAPStruct in the name space "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.4 echoStructAsSimpleTypes

This procedure/method has one input parameter and three return value. The input parameter is of type SOAPStruct in the name space "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". The first output parameter is of type int in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The secound output parameter is of type float in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The third output parameter is of type string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the individual members of SOAPStruct in the input argument as output arguments, in the response.

3.4.5 echoStruct

This procedure/method has three input parameter and a return value. The first input parameter is of type int in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The secound input parameter is of type float in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The third input parameter is of type string in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The return type is SOAPStruct in the name space "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". The semantics of this method consists of using the input arguments to construct an instance of SOAPStruct and returning the result in the response.

3.4.6 echoNestedStruct

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type SOAPStructStruct in the name space "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.7 echoNestedArray

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type SOAPArrayStruct in the name space "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.8 echoFloatArray

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type array of float in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.9 echoStringArray

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type array of string in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.10 echoIntegerArray

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type array of int in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.11 echoBase64

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type base64Binary in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.12 echoBoolean

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type boolean in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.13 echoDate

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type date in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.14 echoDecimal

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type decimal in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.15 echoFloat

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type float in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.16 echoString

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. Both are of type string in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the input argument in the response.

3.4.17 countItems

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. The input parameter is of type array of string in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" and the type of the return value is int in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning the cardinality of the input array argument in the response.

3.4.18 echoBase64

This procedure/method has one input parameter and a return value. The input paramenter is of type string in the name space "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" and the type of the return value is boolean in the namespace "http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema". The semantics of this method consists of returning a boolean 'true' if the input argument is absent, or a boolean 'false' if the input argument is present, in the response.

3.5 Tests

Test:T1

Description:

Node A sends to Node C message with 'echoOk' header block having role equal to "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next". Node C returns back empty body with responseOK header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T2

Description:

Node A sends to Node C message with echoOk header block having role equal to "http://example.org/ts-tests/C". NodeC returns back empty body with responseOK header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    foo
  </test:responseOk>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T3

Description:

Node A sends to Node C message with echoOk header block having no role. NodeC returns back empty body with responseOK header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T4

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with echoOk header block having role="". NodeC sends message back with responseOK header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T5

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with echoOk header block having role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B". Node C sends response message without a responseOK header and an empty body (header block was ignored).

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T6

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with echoOk header block having role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C". NodeB forwards message to NodeC without touching the header block.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    foo
  </test:responseOk>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T7

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with Unknown header block having role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B". NodeB forwards message to NodeC with no header (header was removed).

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Ignore xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T8

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with 3 headers: echoOk header block having no role, Ignore header block having role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B" and echoOk header block having role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none". NodeB removes the second header block, that has role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B" and forwards message to NodeC with 2 other headers included in the same order as in the original message.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
    <test:Ignore xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>  
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body> 
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T9

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with echoOk header block having role="". NodeB forwards message to NodeC with header included.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T10

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Unknown header having role="". NodeC sends empty message back with no headers- header is ignored.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" env:role="">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T11

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Unknown header with mustUnderstand="false" and having role="". NodeC sends empty message back with no headers- header is ignored.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role=""
          env:mustUnderstand="false">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T12

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Unknown header with mustUnderstand="1" and having role="". NodeC sends MustUnderstand fault back.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role=""
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults"> 
    <f:Misunderstood qname="test:Unknown" 
       xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" />
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:MustUnderstand</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Header not understood</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T13

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Unknown header with mustUnderstand="true" and having role="". NodeC sends MustUnderstand fault back.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role=""
          env:mustUnderstand="true">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults"> 
    <f:Misunderstood qname="test:Unknown" 
       xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" />
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:MustUnderstand</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Header not understood</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T14

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with echoOk header with mustUnderstand="wrong" and having role="". NodeC sends a fault back.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role=""
          env:mustUnderstand="wrong">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>env:mustUnderstand value is not boolean</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T15

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Unknown header with mustUnderstand="1" and having role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B". NodeC sends empty message back with no headers- header is ignored.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T16

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with Unknown header with mustUnderstand="1" and having role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C". NodeB forwards message to node C keeping header untouched.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults"> 
    <f:Misunderstood qname="test:Unknown" 
       xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" />
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:MustUnderstand</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Header not understood</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T17

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with Unknown header with mustUnderstand="1" and having role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next". NodeB returns MustUnderstand fault to node A.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults"> 
    <f:Misunderstood qname="test:Unknown" 
       xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"/>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:MustUnderstand</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Header not understood</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T18

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with echoOk header having role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none". NodeB forwards message to the node C, node C responds back to node A with empty message (no body/header blocks).

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T19

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with echoOk header having mustUnderstand = "true" and role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none". Node C ignores this header block and returns empty message (no body/header blocks).

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/none"
          env:mustUnderstand="true">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T20

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Body element that contains non-qualified child. Node C return a Fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <nonqualified>element</nonqualified>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">  
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Message with illegal Body content</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T21

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with Unknown header that has mustUnderstand = "1" and role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B" and echoOk header that has role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C" role and mustUnderstand="1". Node B must return MustUnderstand Fault message to Node A and no message should be forwarded to Node C.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:mustUnderstand="1"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:mustUnderstand="1"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults"> 
    <f:Misunderstood qname="test:Unknown" 
       xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" />
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:MustUnderstand</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Header not understood</env:Reason>
      <env:Node>http://example.org/ts-tests/B</env:Node>
      <env:Role>http://example.org/ts-tests/B</env:Role>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T22

Description:

Node A sends to Node C message with echoOk header that has mustUnderstand="1" and echoOk Body element. NodeC must process the Header and the Body and return to Node A message with responseOk header and responseOk Body element.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:mustUnderstand = "1">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T23

Description:

Node A sends to Node C message with echoOk header that has mustUnderstand="wrong" and Unknown header that has mustUnderstand="1". Node C should return exactly one fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:mustUnderstand="wrong">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>env:mustUnderstand value is not boolean</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T24

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with incorrect namespace of the Envelope element. Node C returns back VersionMismatch Fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://wrong-version/"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:VersionMismatch</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Wrong Version</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T25

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with reference to external DTD. Node C returns back DTDNotSupported Fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<!DOCTYPE env:Envelope SYSTEM "env.dtd"[]>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>DTD are not supported by SOAP 1.2</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T26

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Processing Instruction node. Node C ignores PI and returns back Body with test:responseOk element.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://example.org/ts-tests/sub.xsl" type = "text/xsl"?>
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T27

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with test:echoStringArray that has encodingStyle attibute with a value of "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding", contains an element with attribute enc:itemType="xsd:string" (array of string), but with the child element of a complex type. Node C returns a Fault indicating that message didn't follow SOAP encoding rules (encoded array content didn't correspond to the type declared in the enc:itemType).

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringArray xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <test:array enc:itemType="xs:string" enc:arraySize="1">
        <a>
          <b>1</b>
        </a>
      </test:array>		
    </test:echoStringArray>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Violation of encoding rules</env:Reason>
      <env:Detail>
        Array element declared as array of integers contains elements 
        with wrong content.
      </env:Detail>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T28

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Body element that has encodingStyle attribute. Node C returns Fault message, because Body element must not contain attributes.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" >
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Incorrect SOAP Body element serialization</env:Reason>
      <env:Detail>
        SOAP Body must not have encodingStyle attribute information item.
      </env:Detail>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T29

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with Header having a role attribute value (URI) of length 2K role. Node C returns back empty body.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/Czzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T30

Description:

A SOAP 1.1 sender, Node A, sends a 1.1 message to a SOAP Version 1.2 Node C. Node C may return back a VersionMismatch fault (tested here) or process the message (if it supports SOAP 1.1).

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope">
  <env:Header>
    <v:Upgrade xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-upgrade">
      <envelope qname="ns2:Envelope"
                xmlns:ns2="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"/>
     </v:Upgrade>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:VersionMismatch</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Wrong Version</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T31

Description:

Node A sends to Node C an RPC message. Node C returns a void return value. Note that the return value accessor MUST NOT be present.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:returnVoid xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    </test:returnVoid>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:returnVoidResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    </test:returnVoidResponse>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T32

Description:

Node A sends to Node C an RPC message with a required header. Node C returns the value supplied in the header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:requiredHeader xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:mustUnderstand="true">
      foo
    </test:requiredHeader>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoHeader xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    </test:echoHeader>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoHeaderResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoHeaderResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T33

Description:

Node A sends to node C an RPC message with a procedure it cannot find. Node C returns an fault with env:Sender as the Value for the fault and rpc:ProcedureNotPresent as the Value for the SubCode. Please note that the Value of rpc:ProcedureNotPresent for the SubCode is not required by SOAP 1.2

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:DoesNotExist xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
  </test:doesNotExist>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
         <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
         <env:Subcode>
           <env:Value>rpc:ProcedureNotPresent</env:Value>
         </env:Subcode>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>Procedure Not Present</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T34

Description:

This test consists of Node A sending a msg with a header that has MU=1 in the SOAP 1.1 NS. Node C, ignores this header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          xmlns:env1="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
          env1:mustUnderstand="true">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T35

Description:

This test consists of Node A sending a msg with a Unknown header with MU=1 and role not specified. Node C returns a fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults"> 
    <f:Misunderstood qname="test:Unknown" 
       xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" />
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:MustUnderstand</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Header not understood</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T36

Description:

This test consists of Node A sending a msg with a unknown header that is targeted to the ultimate receiver and has the role attribute set to http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver Node C returns a fault

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:mustUnderstand="1" 
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults"> 
    <f:Misunderstood qname="test:Unknown" 
       xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" />
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:MustUnderstand</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Header not understood</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T37

Description:

This test consists of Node A sending a msg with a header that does not have MU attr defined. Node C returns a valid reply.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T38

Description:

This test consists of Node A sending a msg with a header that has MU attr with all possible lexical values.

First set of messages.

Second set of messages.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:mustUnderstand="false" 
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:mustUnderstand="0" 
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:mustUnderstand="true" 
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:mustUnderstand="1" 
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C"> 
      bar
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      bar
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T39

Description:

This test consists of Node A sending a msg with an unknown header and an incorrect value for the mustUnderstand attribute. Node C returns a env:Sender fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:mustUnderstand="9">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>env:mustUnderstand is a xsd:boolean</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T40

Description:

This test uses the literal format for IPv6 addresses in URIs.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://[FEDC:BA98:7654:3210:FEDC:BA98:7654:3210]/ts-tests"
          env:role="" 
          env:mustUnderstand="false">
      foo
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T41

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C contained in echoStruct with datatype SOAPStruct in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd". Node C returns the datatypes in echoStructResponse.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStruct xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStruct xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct"
                   xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd">
        <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
        <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
        <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
      </inputStruct>
    </test:echoStruct>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStructResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct"
              xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd">
        <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
        <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
        <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
      </return>
    </test:echoStructResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T42

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoStructArray containing an element with attribute enc:itemType="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd:SOAPStruct". Node C responds with echoStructArrayResponse.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStructArray xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStructArray enc:itemType="ns1:SOAPStruct"
                        enc:arraySize="2"
                        xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd"
                        xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct">
          <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
          <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
          <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
        </item>
        <item xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct">
          <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">43</varInt>
          <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.123</varFloat>
          <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">bye world</varString>
        </item>
      </inputStructArray>
    </test:echoStructArray>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStructArrayResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return enc:itemType="ns1:SOAPStruct"
              enc:arraySize="2"
              xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd"
              xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct">
          <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
          <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
          <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
        </item>
        <item xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct">
          <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">43</varInt>
          <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.123</varFloat>
          <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">bye world</varString>
        </item>
      </return>
    </test:echoStructArrayResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T43

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoStructAsSimpleTypes containing datatypes SOAPStruct in the namespace "http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd" Node C responds with echoStructAsSimpleTypesResponse.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStructAsSimpleTypes xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStruct xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct"
                   xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd">
        <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
        <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
        <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
      </inputStruct>
    </test:echoStructAsSimpleTypes>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStructAsSimpleTypesResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <outputInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</outputInt>
      <outputFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</outputFloat>
      <outputString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</outputString>
    </test:echoStructAsSimpleTypesResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T44

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoSimpleTypesAsStruct containing datatypes (integers, floating point, and string). Node C responds with echoSimpleTypesAsStructResponse.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoSimpleTypesAsStruct xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</inputInt>
      <inputFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</inputFloat>
      <inputString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</inputString>
    </test:echoSimpleTypesAsStruct>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoSimpleTypesAsStructResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return<rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="ns1"SOAPStruct"
              xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd">
        <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
        <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
        <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
      </return>
    </test:echoSimpleTypesAsStructResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T45

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoNestedStruct containing datatypes (integers, floating point, and string). Node C responds with echoNestedStruct.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoNestedStruct xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
       env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStruct xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStructStruct"
                   xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd">
        <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
        <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
        <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
        <varStruct xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStruct">
          <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">99</varInt>
          <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">4.0699e-12</varFloat>
          <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">nested struct</varString>
        </varStruct>
      </inputStruct>
    </test:echoNestedStruct>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoNestedStruct xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStructStruct"
              xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd">
        <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
        <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
        <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
        <varStruct xsi:type="ns1:SOAPStructStruct">
          <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">99</varInt>
          <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">4.0699e-12</varFloat>
          <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">nested struct</varString>
        </varStruct>
      </return>
    </test:echoNestedStruct>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T46

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoNestedArray containing an array with three elements. Node C responds with echoNestedArray.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoNestedArray xmlns:test="http://exaple.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStruct xsi:type="ns1:SOAPArrayStruct"
                   xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd">
        <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
        <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
        <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
        <varArray enc:itemType="xsd:string" enc:arraySize="3"
		          xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
          <item xsi:type="xsd:string">red</item>
          <item xsi:type="xsd:string">blue</item>
          <item xsi:type="xsd:string">green</item>
        </varArray>
      </inputStruct>
    </test:echoNestedArray>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoNestedArrayResponse xmlns:test="http://exampel.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="ns1:SOAPArrayStruct">
              xmlns:ns1="http://example.org/ts-tests/xsd">
        <varInt xsi:type="xsd:int">42</varInt>
        <varFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</varFloat>
        <varString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</varString>
        <varArray enc:itemType="xsd:string" enc:arraySize="3"
		          xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
          <item xsi:type="xsd:string">red</item>
          <item xsi:type="xsd:string">blue</item>
          <item xsi:type="xsd:string">green</item>
        </varArray>
      </return>
    </test:echoNestedArrayResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T47

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoFloatArray with enc:itemType="ns:float". Node C responds with echoFloatArray.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoFloatArray xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputFloatArray enc:itemType="xsd:float" enc:arraySize="2"
                       xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:float">0.00000555</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:float">12999.9</item>
      </inputFloatArray>
    </test:echoFloatArray>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoFloatArrayResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return enc:itemType="xsd:float" enc:arraySize="2"
			  xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:float">5.55E-06</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:float">12999.9</item>
      </return>
    </test:echoFloatArrayResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T48

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoStringArray with enc:itemType="ns:string". Node C responds with echoStringArray.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringArray xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStringArray enc:itemType="xsd:string" enc:arraySize="2"
                        xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">hello</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">world</item>
      </inputStringArray>
    </test:echoStringArray>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringArrayResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return enc:itemType="xsd:string" enc:arraySize="2"
              xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">hello</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">world</item>
      </return>
    </test:echoStringArrayResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T49

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoStringArray without a enc:itemType attribute. Node C responds with echoStringArray.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringArray xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStringArray enc:arraySize="2"
                        xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">hello</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">world</item>
      </inputStringArray>
    </test:echoStringArray>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringArrayResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return enc:itemType="xsd:string" enc:arraySize="2"
              xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">hello</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">world</item>
      </return>
    </test:echoStringArrayResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T50

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoIntegerArray with enc:itemType="ns"integer". Node C responds with echoIntegerArray.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoIntegerArray xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputIntegerArray enc:itemType="xsd:int" enc:arraySize="2"
                         xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:int">100</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:int">200</item>
      </inputIntegerArray>
    </test:echoIntegerArray>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoIntegerArrayResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return enc:itemType="xsd:int" enc:arraySize="2"
              xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:int">100</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:int">200</item>
      </return>
    </test:echoIntegerArrayResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T51

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C with Base64-encoded binary data. Node C responds with echoBase64.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoBase64 xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
       env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputBase64 xsi:type="xsd:base64Binary">
        YUdWc2JHOGdkMjl5YkdRPQ==
      </inputBase64>
    </test:echoBase64>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoBase64Response xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:base64Binary">
        YUdWc2JHOGdkMjl5YkdRPQ==
      </return>
    </test:echoBase64Response>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T52

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C containing a boolean datatype with value = 1 in echoBoolean. Note C responds with echoBoolean.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoBoolean xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding">
      <inputBoolean xsi:type="xsd:boolean">1</inputBoolean>
    </test:echoBoolean>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoBooleanResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:boolean">1</return>
    </test:echoBooleanResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T53

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoDate with date datatype. Node C responds with echoDate.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoDate xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputDate xsi:type="xsd:date">1956-10-18T22:20:00-07:00</inputDate>
    </test:echoDate>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoDateResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:date">1956-10-18T15:20:00Z</return>
    </test:echoDateResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T54

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoDecimal with decimal datatype. Node C responds with echoDecimal.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoDecimal xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputDecimal xsi:type="xsd:decimal">123.45678901234567890</inputDecimal>
    </test:echoDecimal>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoDecimalResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:decimal">123.4567890123456789</return>
    </test:echoDecimalResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T55

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C in echoFloat with floating point datatype. Node C responds with echoFloat.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoFloat xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <inputFloat xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</inputFloat>
    </test:echoFloat>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoFloatResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:float">0.005</return>
    </test:echoFloatResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T56

Description:

Node A sends to Node C a message with body containing a ref attribute information item referencing a non-existent id attribute information item. Node C responds with a fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Header>
    <test:DataHolder xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <test:Data id="data-1" xsi:type="xsd:string">
        hello world
      </test:Data>
    </test:DataHolder>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoString xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputString ref="#data-2" xsi:type="xsd:string" />
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
        <env:Subcode>
          <env:Value>enc:MissingID</env:Value>
        </env:Subcode>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Unresolved reference</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T57

Description:

Node A sends to Node C a message with body containing a ref attribute information item referencing a unique indetifier defined by an id attribute information item. Node C responds by echoing the value of the element information item containing the referenced id attribute information item.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Header>
    <test:DataHolder xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <test:Data id="data" xsi:type="xsd:string">
        hello world
      </test:Data>
    </test:DataHolder>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoString xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <test:inputString ref="#data" xsi:type="xsd:string" />
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:string">
        hello world
      <return>
    </test:echoStringResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T58

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C invoking the rpc echoIntegerArray. The inputIntegerArray element contains the attribute enc:itemType="xsd:int" but the children of this element are not of type xsd:int. Node C returns a fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope" 
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoIntegerArray xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputIntegerArray enc:itemType="xsd:int" enc:arraySize="1"
                   xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <a><b>1</b></a>
      </test:array>		
    </test:echoIntegerArray>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>Violation of encoding rules</env:Reason>
       <env:Detail>
          Array element declared as array of integers contains elements with 
          wrong content.
      </env:Detail>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T59

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C with a body containing a ref attribute information item and an id information item on the same element information item. Node C returns a fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringArray xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStringArray enc:itemType="xsd:string" 
                        xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        <item id="data" xsi:type"xsd:string" ref="#data">hello</item>
        <item>world</item>
      </inputStringArray>
    </test:echoStringArray>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
        <env:Subcode>
          <env:Value>enc:MissingID</env:Value>
        </env:Subcode>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Violation of id and ref information items</env:Reason>
      <env:detail>
        A ref attribute information item and an id attribute information 
        item MUST NOT appear on the same element information item.
      </env:detail>
    </env:Fault>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T60

Description:

Node A sends to Node C a message specifying an array with bound specified by an asterisk. Node C responds with the count of items that appeared in the input array.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:countItems xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStringArray enc:itemType="xsd:string" enc:arraySize="*">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">hello</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">world</item>
      </inputStringArray>
    </test:countItems>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:countItemsResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:int">
        2
      </return>
    </test:countItemsResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T61

Description:

Node A sends to Node C a message specifying an array with bound specified by an asterisk. Node C responds with the count of items that appeared in the input array.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:countItems xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:enc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputStringArray enc:itemType="xsd:string" enc:arraySize="2 *">
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">hello</item>
        <item xsi:type="xsd:string">world</item>
      </inputStringArray>
    </test:countItems>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>* may only be first arraySize value in list</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T62

Description:

Node A sends a msg to node B with three headers in it with MU=1 and targeted at Node B. The semantics of processing the header test:concatAndForwardEchoOK requires Node B to take the contents of test:concatAndForwardEchoOkArg1 and test:concatAndForwardEchoOkArg2, concatanate them and forward the result to Node C using the test:echoOk header. Node C then receives the concatanated data in the test:echoOk header and responds using the test:responsOk header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:concatAndForwardEchoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B"
          env:mustUnderstand="1"/>
    <test:concatAndForwardEchoOkArg1 xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      StringA
    </test:concatAndForwardEchoOkArg1>
    <test:concatAndForwardEchoOkArg2 xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/B"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      StringB
    </test:concatAndForwardEchoOkArg2>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests" 
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      StringAStringB
    </test:echoOk>  
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      StringAStringB
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T63

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C with one headers in it with MU=1 and targeted at Node C. The semantics of processing the header test:validateCountryCode requires Node C to take the contents of test:validateCountryCode and validate that it consists of 2 letters. If the code sent is not 2 letters then a fault is sent back. The details of the fault are sent in the header test:validateCountryCodeFault

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:validateCountryCode xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://example.org/ts-tests/C"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      ABCD
    </test:validateCountryCode>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header>
    <test:validateCountryCodeFault xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      Country code must be 2 letters.
    </test:validateCountryCodeFault>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>env:Sender</env:Code>
       <env:Reason>Not a valid country code</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T64

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C with non-empty [notation] property. Node C responds by sending back a fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<!NOTATION application_xml SYSTEM 'http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/media-types/application/xml'>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>DTD are not supported by SOAP 1.2</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T65

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C with non-empty [unparsed entity] property. Node C responds by sending back a fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<!ELEMENT Envelope (Body) >
<!ELEMENT Body (echoOk) >
<!ELEMENT echoOk (#PCDATA) >
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>DTD are not supported by SOAP 1.2</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T66

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C with non-empty [encoding] property. Node C responds by sending the appropriate 'responseOk'.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF8'?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T67

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C with [standalone] property as 'true'. Node C responds by sending the appropriate 'responseOk'.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' standalone='yes'?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
        env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next">
    foo
  </test:echoOk>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T68

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C with a soap message which is semantically eqivalent to the request message in T1 test (the only difference being additional whitespace character information item). Node C responds by sending the appropriate 'responseOk'.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 


 <env:Header           >

                          <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
        env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next"  >
    foo
  </test:echoOk>
  

 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 
            
 </env:Body>
 
 

</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T69

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C which does not contain a Body element. Node C responds by sending an appropriate fault

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
 <env:Header>
	<test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">foo</test:echoOk>
 </env:Header>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>env:Body must be present in a SOAP 1.2 envelope</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T70

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C which contains Header, Body and a Trailer element Node C responds by sending an appropriate fault

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header>
	<test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">foo</test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
  <Trailer>
  </Trailer>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>A SOAP 1.2 envelope can contain only Header and Body</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T71

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C with a non-namespace qualified attribute on the Envelope Node C responds by sending an appropriate fault

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
     attr1="a-value">
  <env:Header>
	<test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>A SOAP 1.2 Envelope element cannot have non Namespace qualified attributes</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T72

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C with the encodingStyle set on the Envelope element. Node C responds by sending an appropriate fault

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope" 
              env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>
        env:encodingStyle cannot be specified on the env:Envelope
      </env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T73

Description:

Node A sends a message to node C, using the SOAP RPC convention. The RCP asks for node C to echo back the string. The message sent by A has encodingStyle set on the Body block as well as the RPC input parameter. Node C responds by echoing the parameter.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoString xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
                     env:encodingStyle="">
      <test:inputString xsi:type="xsd:string"
            env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
        hello world
      </test:inputString>
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world
      </return>
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T74

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C with 2 headers echoOk and Unknown. The Unknown header does not have a mustUnderstand or role attribute set, but the child of the header block does. Node C does not understand the Unknown header but can safely ignore it, and responds to the echoOk header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      <test:raiseFault env:mustUnderstand="1" 
            env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next">
      </test:raiseFault>
    </test:Unknown>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Header>
    <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      foo
    </test:responseOk>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T75

Description:

Node A sends a message to Node C with header echoResolvedRef containing a relative reference defined by xlink:href and xml:base. Node C responds by echoing the resolved reference.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:echoResolvedRef xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
        env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next"
        env:mustUnderstand="1">
    <test:RelativeReference xml:base="http://example.org/today/"
          xlink:href="new.xml"
          xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" />
  </test:echoResolvedRef>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:responseResolvedRef xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    http://example.org/today/new.xml
  </test:resonseResolvedRef>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T76

Description:

Node A sends 2 different serialization for echoString test and gets the same response back from Node C

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope" 
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoString xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputString xsi:type="xsd:string">
        hello world
      </inputString>
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:string">
        hello world
      </return>
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Header>
    <test:DataHolder xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <test:Data id="data" xsi:type="xsd:string">
        hello world
      </test:Data>
    </test:DataHolder>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoString xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputString ref="data" xsi:type="xsd:string" />
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:string">
        hello world
      </return>
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T77

Description:

This test consists of an RPC called 'isNil'. This RPC has one parameter of any type. The return value is of type boolean. If the request message has a parameter that was absent or had xsi:nil='1', the returned value is true, else it is false. Node A is the requesting node and Node C is the responding node. This test consists of 3 requests and responses send by Node A and Node C respectively.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope" 
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:isNil xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputString xsi:nil="1" />
    </test:isNil>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:isNilResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:boolean">
        1
      </return>
    </test:isNilResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope" 
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:isNil xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
    </test:isNil>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:isNilResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:boolean">
        1
      </return>
    </test:isNilResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope" 
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:isNil xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <inputString xsi:type="xsd:string">
        This is a string
      <inputString>
    </test:isNil>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:isNilResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc"
          env:encodingStyle="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-encoding">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:boolean">
        0
      <return>
    </test:isNilResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T78

Description:

Node A sends to node C message with echoOk header block having role equal to "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver". NodeC returns back empty body with responseOK header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
        env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/ultimateReceiver">
    foo
  </test:echoOk>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    foo
  </test:responseOk>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T79

Description:

Node A sends to node B message with echoOk header block having role equal to "http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/ultimateReceiver". Node B forwards this message to Node C. NodeC returns back empty body with responseOK header.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
        env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/ultimateReceiver">
    foo
  </test:echoOk>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node B


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
        env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/ultimateReceiver">
    foo
  </test:echoOk>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version='1.0' ?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
 <env:Header>
  <test:responseOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
    foo
  </test:responseOk>
 </env:Header>
 <env:Body>
 </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:T80

Description:

This tests assumes the existence of a conventionally non-existant encoding to test a failure condition. It is the intention that no receiving SOAP 1.2 node will support this encoding and that on receiving this encoding style declaration in a SOAP message, will return the DataEncodingUnknown fault. Node A sends a simple SOAP 1.2 message to Node C containing the poison encoding style declaration. Node C responds with a fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk encodingStyle="http://example.org/PoisonEncoding">
      foo
    </test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


<?xml version="1.0"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"> 
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:DataEncodingUnknown<env:/value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>Unknown Data Encoding Style</env:Reason>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:TH1

Description:

This tests consists of testing SOAP 1.2 HTTP bindings. Node A sends a valid SOAP request message over HTTP 1.1 to Node C. Node C responds with a HTTP status 200 and a SOAP response message.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


POST /soap1.2/interop HTTP/1.1
Host: www.w3.org
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoString xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      <inputString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</inputString>
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoStringResponse xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          xmlns:rpc="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-rpc">
      <rpc:result>return</rpc:result>
      <return xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</return>
    </test:echoStringResponse>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:TH2

Description:

This tests consists of testing SOAP 1.2 HTTP bindings. Node A sends an invalid SOAP (with a missing 'Body' element) request message over HTTP 1.1 to Node C. Node C responds with a HTTP status 400 and a SOAP message containing a 'env:Sender' SOAP fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


POST /soap1.2/interop HTTP/1.1
Host: www.w3.org
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">foo</test:echoOk>
  </env:Header>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:Sender</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>env:Body must be present in a SOAP 1.2 envelope</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:TH3

Description:

This tests consists of testing SOAP 1.2 HTTP bindings. Node A sends a valid SOAP 1.1 request message over HTTP 1.1 to Node C. Node C responds with a HTTP status 500 and a SOAP message containing a 'env:VersionMismatch' SOAP fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


POST /soap1.2/interop HTTP/1.1
Host: www.w3.org
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoOk xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">foo</test:echoOk>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header>
    <v:Upgrade xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-upgrade">
      <envelope qname="ns1:Envelope"
	            xmlns:ns1="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"/>
    </V:Upgrade>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
      <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:VersionMismatch</env:Value>
      </env:Code>
      <env:Reason>Wrong Version</env:Reason>
    </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:TH4

Description:

This tests consists of testing SOAP 1.2 HTTP bindings. Node A sends a SOAP request message over HTTP 1.1 to Node C. This request message contains a header with mustUnderstand="1", which Node C does not understand. Node C responds with a HTTP status 500 and a SOAP message containing a 'env:MustUnderstand' SOAP fault.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


POST /soap1.2/interop HTTP/1.1
Host: www.w3.org
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope">
  <env:Header>
    <test:Unknown xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"
          env:role="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next"
          env:mustUnderstand="1">
      foo
    </test:Unknown> 
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Content-Type: application/soap+xml; charset="utf-8"
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-faults"> 
  <env:Header>
    <f:Misunderstood qname="test:Unknown" xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests"/>
  </env:Header>
  <env:Body>
     <env:Fault>
       <env:Code>
        <env:Value>env:MustUnderstand</env:Value>
       </env:Code>
       <env:Reason>Header not understood</env:Reason>
       <env:Role>http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope/role/next</env:Role>
     </env:Fault>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Test:TH5

Description:

This tests consists of testing SOAP 1.2 HTTP bindings. Node A sends an valid SOAP request message over HTTP 1.1 to Node C, using media type "audio/mpeg". Node C responds with a HTTP status 415.

Messages:

Message sent from Node A


POST /soap1.2/interop HTTP/1.1
Host: www.w3.org
Content-Type: audio/mpeg
Content-Length: nnn

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/soap-envelope"
              xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" 
              xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
  <env:Body>
    <test:echoString xmlns:test="http://example.org/ts-tests">
      <inputString xsi:type="xsd:string">hello world</inputString>
    </test:echoString>
  </env:Body>
</env:Envelope>

Message sent from Node C


HTTP/1.1 415 Unsupported Media

4. References

4.1 Normative References

[1]
W3C Working Draft "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework", Martin Gudgin, Marc Hadley, Jean-Jacques Moreau, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, 26 June 2002 (See http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part1-20020626.)
[2]
W3C Working Draft "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 2: Adjuncts", Martin Gudgin, Marc Hadley, Jean-Jacques Moreau, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen, 26 June 2002 (See http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-soap12-part2-20020626.)

4.2 Informative References

[3]
XML Protocol Charter (See http://www.w3.org/2000/09/XML-Protocol-Charter.)
[4]
XML Protocol Discussion Archive (See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/.)
[5]
XML Protocol Comments Archive (See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlp-comments/.)

A. Acknowledgements (Non-Normative)

This specification is the work of the W3C XML Protocol Working Group.

Members of the Working Group are (at the time of writing, and by alphabetical order): Yasser alSafadi (Philips Research), Vidur Apparao (Netscape), Camilo Arbelaez (WebMethods), Mark Baker (Idokorro Mobile), Carine Bournez (W3C), Michael Champion (Software AG), Paul Cotton (Microsoft Corporation), Glen Daniels (Macromedia), Paul Denning (Mitre), Frank DeRose (Tibco), Colleen Evans (Progress Software), David Fallside (Chair, IBM), Chris Ferris (Sun Microsystems), Dietmar Gaertner (Software AG), Marc Hadley (Sun Microsystems), Gerd Hoelzing (SAP AG), Oisin Hurley (IONA Technologies), Yin-Leng Husband (Hewlett Packard), John Ibbotson (IBM), Ryuji Inoue (Matsushita Electric), Kazunori Iwasa (Fujitsu Limited), Murali Janakiraman (Rogue Wave), Mario Jeckle (DaimlerChrysler Research & Technology), Mark Jones (AT&T), Anish Karmarkar (Oracle), Jacek Kopecky (Systinet), Yves Lafon (W3C), Michah Lerner (AT&T), Bob Lojek (Intalio), Brad Lund (Intel), Noah Mendelsohn (IBM), Jeff Mischkinsky (Oracle), Nilo Mitra (Ericsson), Jean-Jacques Moreau (Canon), Highland Mary Mountain (Intel), Don Mullen (Tibco), Masahiko Narita (Fujitsu Limited), Eric Newcomer (IONA Technologies), Henrik Frystyk Nielsen (Microsoft Corporation), David Orchard (BEA Systems), Andreas Riegg (DaimlerChrysler Research & Technology), Herve Ruellan (Canon), Marwan Sabbouh (Mitre), Miroslav Simek (Systinet), Simeon Simeonov (Macromedia), Nick Smilonich (Unisys), Lynne Thompson (Unisys), Patrick Thompson (Rogue Wave), Asir Vedamuthu (WebMethods), Pete Wenzel (SeeBeyond), Ray Whitmer (Netscape), Volker Wiechers (SAP AG), Stuart Williams (Hewlett Packard), Amr Yassin (Philips Research), Jin Yu (Martsoft)

Previous members were: Bill Anderson (Xerox), Mark Baker (Sun Microsystems), Philippe Bedu (Electricite de France), Olivier Boudeville (Electricite de France), Don Box (DevelopMentor), Tom Breuel (Xerox), Dick Brooks (Group 8760), Winston Bumpus (Novell), David Burdett (Commerce One), Charles Campbell (Informix Software), Alex Ceponkus (Bowstreet), Miles Chaston (Epicentric), David Clay (Oracle), David Cleary (Progress Software), Ugo Corda (Xerox), Fransisco Cubera (IBM), Ron Daniel (Interwoven), Glen Daniels (Allaire), Dug Davis (IBM), Ray Denenberg (Library of Congress), Mike Dierken (DataChannel), Andrew Eisenberg (Progress Software), Brian Eisenberg (DataChannel), John Evdemon (XMLSolutions), David Ezell (Hewlett Packard), Eric Fedok (Active Data Exchange), Daniela Florescu (Propel), Dan Frantz (BEA Systems), Michael Freeman (Engenia Software Corp), Scott Golubock (Epicentric), Rich Greenfield (Library of Congress), Martin Gudgin (DevelopMentor), Hugo Haas (W3C), Mark Hale (Interwoven), Randy Hall (Intel), Bjoern Heckel (Epicentric), Erin Hoffman (Tradia), Steve Hole (MessagingDirect Ltd.), Mary Holstege (Calico Commerce), Jim Hughes (Fujitsu Software Corp), Yin-Leng Husband (Compaq), Scott Isaacson (Novell), Eric Jenkins (Engenia Software), Jay Kasi (Commerce One), Jeffrey Kay (Engenia Software), Richard Koo (Vitria Technology Inc.), Alan Kropp (Epicentric), Julian Kumar (Epicentric), Peter Lecuyer (Progress Software), Tony Lee (Vitria Technology Inc.), Henry Lowe (OMG), Matthew MacKenzie (XMLGlobal Technologies), Murray Maloney (Commerce One), Richard Martin (Active Data Exchange), Noah Mendelsohn (Lotus Development), Alex Milowski (Lexica), Kevin Mitchell (XMLSolutions), Ed Mooney (Sun Microsystems), Dean Moses (Epicentric), Rekha Nagarajan (Calico Commerce), Raj Nair (Cisco), Mark Needleman (Data Research Associates), Art Nevarez (Novell), Mark Nottingham (Akamai Technologies), Conleth O'Connell (Vignette), David Orchard (Jamcracker), Kevin Perkins (Compaq), Jags Ramnaryan (BEA Systems), Vilhelm Rosenqvist (NCR), Waqar Sadiq (Vitria Technology Inc.), Rich Salz (Zolera) Krishna Sankar (Cisco), George Scott (Tradia), Shane Sesta (Active Data Exchange), Lew Shannon (NCR), John-Paul Sicotte (MessagingDirect Ltd.), Simeon Simeonov (Allaire), Aaron Skonnard (Developmentor), Soumitro Tagore (Informix Software), James Tauber (Bowstreet), Jim Trezzo (Oracle), Randy Waldrop (WebMethods), Fred Waskiewicz (OMG), David Webber (XMLGlobal Technologies), Yan Xu (DataChannel), Susan Yee (Active Data Exchange).

The people who have contributed to discussions on xml-dist-app@w3.org are also gratefully acknowledged.

The editors would like to acknowledge Kirill Gavrylyuk (Microsoft Corp.) for the gladly-received contribution of test for SOAP 1.2 Part 1.

The editors would like to acknowledge Nick Smilonich for reviewing this document.