This review is about three documents:
ID | Location | Comment | Mail thread | Accepted |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | General |
Your deployment of IRI is excellent! |
- | - |
2 | Core |
In sec. 2.1.2 you write: "The value of the targetNamespace attribute information item SHOULD be a dereferenceable IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987])." In sec. 2.1.2.1 you write: "The type of the targetNamespace attribute information item is xs:anyURI. Its value MUST be an absolute IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987])." Why do you have a SHOULD vs. a MUST? If the SHOULD is because of "dereferencable", I would propose: "The value of the targetNamespace attribute information item MUST be an IRI (see [IETF RFC 3987]) and SHOULD be dereferenceable." |
- | - |
3 | In Core: On reference of xs:anyURI | It would be good if you could mention that although xs:anyURI allows for IRIs (see LC74a), the mapping from IRI to URI in xs:anyURI is currently not defined in terms of IRI. This comment relates also for example to the reference of xs:anyURI in sec. 2.1.2.1 and sec. 3.1.2.1, and to the Adjuncts specification. | - | - |
4 | Core sec. C.2, Binding sec. 2.4 | Some examples need better formatting. | - | - |
Version: $Id: wsdl20-review.html,v 1.2 2005/10/25 16:07:27 fsasaki Exp $