Janina: web of things - had outreach and agreeable to discuss during TPAC
<Joshue108> We have a new second draft of XAUR http://raw.githack.com/w3c/apa/xaur/xaur/index.html
Josh: XAUR is essentially ready, but probably needs review of boilerplate language
Janina: we are probably at the
state of an updated working draft
... We probably want more comments before we finalize
<Joshue108> Here is the link to the Cognitive Accessibility ML https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/wiki/index.php?title=MLWorkshop2020
Janina: follow-up with Lisa after last week's meeting - machine working video is in process
Judy: accessibility of remote meetings - still checking on a few things - what should happen next on this document? First draft?
Scott: in favor of going out for more review and comments externally - most internal work has been done
Judy: this is more of a loose collection...yes?
<Zakim> Joshue, you wanted to speak in favour of note track
Janina: best practices first working draft seems appropriate
Josh: no reason to object to a note track document
Judy: may need to rework as a note - may help with visability
Jason: something that is more formal may have more drawing power for comments
Judy: may want to do mapping as a
note and bring to APA
... next step - Judy and Scott will get together to work on
this
Janina: Remote meetings are quickly becoming more the norm -- even after COVID-19
RESOLUTION: To try the "Accessibility of Remote Meetings" as a Note
Jason: research materials - literature review?
Janina: update - agreement with
timedtext that this is a timely topic
... if we can do a lit search now on the visual and audio track
on how closely they need to be synchronized, esp for lip
reading
... begin with Wiki page - mention captions, described video,
transcripts, how tightly these need to be synchronized
Jason: will start up a Wiki this week to begin
Judy: Besides the XAUR, do we need a parking lot for the MAUR?
Janina: Yes...synchronization wasn't covered in the MAUR
Judy: another thing we may need
to track is the way that other work groups are actually dealing
with these issues
... another piece is whether this is making its way to the
FAST
Janina: yes...in process
<Joshue108> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/43
Josh: Will change to remove language bias
Judy: the practice of highlighting borders for speakers can be an attentional problem as well
Janina: how does the 3rd party VRS person identify themselves...or do they need to?
Judy: baseline is that the 3rd party assumes same confidentiality as 1st person
Jason: what about the assumption that the person using the 3rd party is a person with a disability...
Judy: Need to be careful to
reference standard confidentiality practices
... will look into this further in a later call
This is scribe.perl Revision of Date Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: Irssi_ISO8601_Log_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/ no track/ note track/ Default Present: Joshue, janina, scott_h, nicolocarp, SteveNoble Present: Joshue janina scott_h nicolocarp SteveNoble Joshue108 No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: SteveNoble Inferring Scribes: SteveNoble Found Date: 19 Aug 2020 People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]