IRC log of tt on 2017-09-07
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:10:22 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #tt
- 14:10:22 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2017/09/07-tt-irc
- 14:10:24 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 14:10:24 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #tt
- 14:10:26 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Timed Text Working Group Teleconference
- 14:10:26 [trackbot]
- Date: 07 September 2017
- 14:11:55 [nigel]
- Present: Glenn, Thierry, Nigel
- 14:11:59 [nigel]
- Regrets: Andreas
- 14:12:01 [nigel]
- Chair: Nigel
- 14:12:04 [nigel]
- scribe: nigel
- 14:12:24 [nigel]
- Nigel: Apologies for the late start!
- 14:13:01 [nigel]
- Topic: This meeting
- 14:14:07 [nigel]
- Nigel: Today, we have: TPAC (including demos?), IMSC, TTML.
- 14:14:22 [nigel]
- Thierry: Also David Singer requested I send a reminder for the WebVTT review. It sounds
- 14:14:35 [nigel]
- .. reasonable but I want everybody's opinion because it's a bit of a clash with the recent
- 14:14:44 [nigel]
- .. request we've had for TTML2, but I think we have no other solution.
- 14:14:56 [nigel]
- Nigel: Okay we'll add WebVTT to the agenda.
- 14:15:16 [nigel]
- Nigel: Any other business or particular points to cover today?
- 14:15:57 [nigel]
- Present+ Pierre, Mike
- 14:16:51 [nigel]
- Pierre: I need to drop off no later than 1 hour from now.
- 14:17:02 [nigel]
- Mike: I'm also conflicted at the top of the hour.
- 14:17:08 [nigel]
- Nigel: Okay let's go then!
- 14:17:13 [nigel]
- Topic: TPAC
- 14:17:49 [nigel]
- Nigel: Dominique reminded me that in June I offered that the TTWG would like to present a demo during the TPAC demo session on the Wednesday.
- 14:19:04 [nigel]
- .. What I proposed originally was that we demonstrate the styling features in TTML that
- 14:19:18 [nigel]
- .. we have and would like to see implemented also in CSS, as it's a good forum for
- 14:19:31 [nigel]
- .. disseminating that information and driving interest.
- 14:19:53 [nigel]
- .. What do you think? Is that a good idea?
- 14:20:00 [pal]
- pal has joined #tt
- 14:20:59 [nigel]
- .. I don't mind doing it, especially if I can have some help putting it together - I guess
- 14:21:10 [nigel]
- .. the thing to do would be to show the features that we think are somehow highest in
- 14:21:13 [nigel]
- .. priority.
- 14:21:19 [nigel]
- Pierre: Okay, yes.
- 14:23:01 [nigel]
- Pierre: What about using imsc.js as the basis for that? Showing all the workarounds we
- 14:23:08 [nigel]
- .. had to do to achieve the desired effects?
- 14:23:12 [nigel]
- Nigel: Yes, sounds good.
- 14:23:25 [nigel]
- Pierre: If we just complain for 30 minutes it wouldn't look great!
- 14:23:29 [nigel]
- Nigel: +1
- 14:23:48 [nigel]
- Pierre: We can think about that, find a way to make it both fun and instructive, and
- 14:23:55 [nigel]
- .. highlight things we'd like to do that are difficult now.
- 14:24:02 [nigel]
- Nigel: Sounds good to me.
- 14:24:17 [nigel]
- Pierre: We can work offline and see if we can find a way to do it.
- 14:24:25 [nigel]
- Nigel: Okay, let's do it. Anyone else want to be involved?
- 14:25:20 [nigel]
- Nigel: Moving on to the agenda.
- 14:25:29 [nigel]
- -> https://www.w3.org/wiki/TimedText/tpac2017 TPAC TTWG schedule wiki page
- 14:25:50 [nigel]
- Nigel: Thanks for adding your names!
- 14:26:45 [nigel]
- Nigel: Looking at the agenda, I don't think anyone has added anything yet, so please could
- 14:26:48 [nigel]
- .. we focus on it next week?
- 14:27:18 [nigel]
- ACTION: nigel Add TTWG TPAC2017 wiki page to next agenda by 2017-09-12
- 14:27:19 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-505 - Add ttwg tpac2017 wiki page to next agenda by 2017-09-12 [on Nigel Megitt - due 2017-09-14].
- 14:29:45 [nigel]
- Topic: IMSC
- 14:30:09 [nigel]
- Nigel: I wanted to note that on behalf of BBC I've posted our gstreamer patch as an
- 14:30:18 [nigel]
- .. implementation on the implementation report page for IMSC 1.0.1
- 14:30:23 [nigel]
- Pierre: Thanks for posting that
- 14:31:47 [nigel]
- Nigel: It'd be good to have another pair of eyes verify the screenshot, because there's
- 14:32:05 [nigel]
- .. subtlety there and it's good to have an independent view not from the contributing
- 14:32:07 [nigel]
- .. organisation.
- 14:32:11 [nigel]
- Pierre: I'll have a look.
- 14:32:13 [nigel]
- Nigel: Thank you
- 14:32:25 [nigel]
- Glenn: The two screengrabs look fine to me.
- 14:32:30 [nigel]
- Nigel: Great, thank you.
- 14:33:06 [nigel]
- .. Now the pressure is on to find a second implementation...
- 14:33:54 [nigel]
- Glenn: We have support for activeArea already in TTV but it's just parsing it and verifying
- 14:33:56 [nigel]
- .. its correctness.
- 14:34:03 [nigel]
- Nigel: Formally, I think that's all that's needed.
- 14:34:31 [nigel]
- .. If you could send notification of that formally to the group that would be really helpful.
- 14:34:35 [nigel]
- Glenn: Okay, sure.
- 14:34:38 [nigel]
- Nigel: Thank you.
- 14:35:19 [nigel]
- Topic: TTML2 Review
- 14:35:23 [nigel]
- action-503?
- 14:35:23 [trackbot]
- action-503 -- Thierry Michel to Send a reminder to groups for ttml2 review by 8th september -- due 2017-08-17 -- OPEN
- 14:35:23 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/AudioVideo/TT/tracker/actions/503
- 14:35:33 [nigel]
- Nigel: Thierry, I think you've done this?
- 14:35:35 [nigel]
- Thierry: Yes I have.
- 14:35:39 [nigel]
- Nigel: Thank you!
- 14:35:42 [nigel]
- close action-503
- 14:35:42 [trackbot]
- Closed action-503.
- 14:37:05 [nigel]
- Glenn: I've added horizontal review "comment disposed" to the 8 closed issues previously
- 14:37:20 [nigel]
- .. labelled "horizontal review comment". This marks disposal of comments received during
- 14:37:40 [nigel]
- .. the review process. For the others it wouldn't harm to have a label indicating that the
- 14:37:55 [nigel]
- .. WG has reviewed it.
- 14:38:16 [nigel]
- Nigel: Do you mean to indicate the WG has agreed the disposition and we are awaiting confirmation from the commenter?
- 14:38:46 [nigel]
- Glenn: It would probably be useful to note that the WG reviewed the non-review issues
- 14:39:09 [nigel]
- .. from within the group also. There were a number of issues posted by members that were
- 14:39:25 [nigel]
- .. not marked as review comments originally. I'd say most of our issues in the past have
- 14:39:28 [nigel]
- .. fallen into that category.
- 14:39:45 [nigel]
- .. The alternative is I change the new label just to "WG disposed" and use that for all of
- 14:39:50 [nigel]
- .. the items that the WG has reviewed.
- 14:40:31 [nigel]
- .. It was not my intent to mark that we have had confirmation of the disposition from the commenter,
- 14:40:50 [nigel]
- .. just that the WG has agreed what to do.
- 14:41:42 [nigel]
- Nigel: My interpretation is that we need a different label for "WG disposition agreed" and the
- 14:42:08 [nigel]
- .. current "comment disposed" issue means that we have given a sufficient opportunity for
- 14:42:41 [nigel]
- .. the original commenter to feed back on the WG disposition.
- 14:42:59 [nigel]
- .. The main user for these labels will likely be Thierry. Does this make sense to you Thierry?
- 14:43:17 [nigel]
- Thierry: Yes, I'll have a look and check it makes sense and tweak the labels if needed.
- 14:44:11 [nigel]
- Nigel: It might be useful to put together a wiki page explaining the process we are using
- 14:44:30 [nigel]
- .. and what labels we are putting on GitHub issues to track the (not particularly changed)
- 14:44:45 [nigel]
- .. process instead of using Dom's old web tool.
- 14:44:59 [nigel]
- Thierry: Okay, you can give me an action for that - I've done some work already on WebVTT similarly.
- 14:45:20 [nigel]
- Action: Thierry Draft a wiki page explaining our review and disposition steps and labels
- 14:45:22 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-506 - Draft a wiki page explaining our review and disposition steps and labels [on Thierry Michel - due 2017-09-14].
- 14:45:44 [nigel]
- Thierry: Once we have these labels on GitHub we will be able to filter on the labels and
- 14:46:04 [nigel]
- .. generate automatic dispositions of comments, or at least a list of agreed and not agreed comments?
- 14:46:08 [nigel]
- Nigel: Exactly, yes.
- 14:47:27 [nigel]
- Topic: WebVTT review feedback
- 14:47:47 [nigel]
- Thierry: Nothing really exciting here! As Nigel said last week, I had reminded the TTML2
- 14:48:00 [nigel]
- .. review to the W3C groups we have dependencies with and horizontal review and external
- 14:48:12 [nigel]
- .. groups, and TTML2 review ends on Sep 30. David Singer saw this and our discussion and
- 14:48:24 [nigel]
- .. asked me if I could do the same for WebVTT, and I think that's fair enough. The review
- 14:48:38 [nigel]
- .. ends on 22nd September for WebVTT, but last week Nigel you had raised a concern about
- 14:48:53 [nigel]
- .. having two reviews simultaneously and that it could be confusing to receive such requests
- 14:49:06 [nigel]
- .. for review for two different formats within the same week but I don't see how we can
- 14:49:12 [nigel]
- .. avoid that unfortunately.
- 14:49:16 [nigel]
- Nigel: Neither do I!
- 14:49:30 [nigel]
- Thierry: So far we have no comments from external groups either for TTML2 or WebVTT.
- 14:49:43 [nigel]
- .. One or two groups have responded that they will process it during an October meeting,
- 14:50:00 [nigel]
- .. but that's the only kind of answer we got (for both TTML2 and WebVTT), so a reminder
- 14:50:04 [nigel]
- .. is certainly necessary.
- 14:50:14 [nigel]
- .. My question is: is anyone against me taking that action?
- 14:50:27 [nigel]
- .. (but I think it would be unfair to say no!)
- 14:50:51 [nigel]
- Nigel: It seems that nobody wishes to be unfair, so I think you can go ahead Thierry.
- 14:51:12 [nigel]
- Thierry: Okay. Also Nigel just to mention that Daniel was a bit surprised about all the
- 14:51:28 [nigel]
- .. messages to team-liaisons, so he asked for a single summary email listing all the groups
- 14:51:43 [nigel]
- .. to which the reminders had been sent. So I will not copy team-liaisons on purpose this time.
- 14:51:51 [nigel]
- Nigel: OK, thanks, that makes sense.
- 14:52:52 [nigel]
- Topic: Meeting close
- 14:53:17 [nigel]
- Nigel: We've completed our agenda for today, and have no other business so I'll adjourn
- 14:53:36 [nigel]
- .. the meeting. Thanks everyone. Next week, let's discuss TPAC agenda please.
- 14:53:41 [nigel]
- .. [adjourns meeting]
- 14:53:44 [nigel]
- rrsagent. make minutes
- 14:53:57 [nigel]
- s/rrsagent. make minutes/
- 14:54:03 [nigel]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 14:54:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/07-tt-minutes.html nigel
- 15:18:47 [nigel]
- scribeOptions: -final -noEmbedDiagnostics
- 15:18:48 [nigel]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:18:48 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2017/09/07-tt-minutes.html nigel
- 16:43:44 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #tt