See also: IRC log
Approving last SDW BP call minutes:
<Linda> +1
<ClemensPortele> +1
Minutes approved.
Patent call:
-> https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Patent_Call
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document
(Restructure the document to move the summary to the top and remove the template)
Linda: Restructuring is done, BP
overview is now chapter 4
... action is complete
<Linda> ClemensPortele: is done, except that links to issues are still in the draft.
ClemensPortele: actions done, no
comments received
... issues could be closed
Action Linda to review whether the issues can be closed
<trackbot> Created ACTION-260 - Review whether the issues can be closed [on Linda van den Brink - due 2017-02-08].
Linda: Everyone should review the changes (like all other changes)
ClemensPortele: schema.org
snippet is included, but statistics on schema.org Place is
missing
... needs to wait for Ed's input
Linda: Done, rewrite done by Ed
and now in the Editor's draft
... some parts were left out as too detailed for the
audience
ClemensPortele: detail seemed sufficient to me
Linda: again, everyone to review
Linda: Byron is working on it, no pull request, progress unclear
Action Linda to ask Byron about progress on ACTION-241
<trackbot> Created ACTION-261 - Ask byron about progress on action-241 [on Linda van den Brink - due 2017-02-08].
Linda: jtandy reported that he
wants to work on it over the weekend
... should be part of the next release
AndreaPerego: Had a call with
jtandy about the changes
... will work on this next week, we should have something ready
in two weeks
... plans to make changes in fork in his own repository so that
everyone can review before merging into the Editor's draft
Linda: sounds good
AndreaPerego: There has been a
discussion on the email list and in the last meeting that will
have an impact on the BP
... also we should add to the glossary, e.g. on
"dimension"
... there is a specialist definition in the ISO-based glossary,
but we should also have something for the non-specialist
Linda: yes, this is one of the terms we take for granted
ChrisLittle: my working
definition is what is in the RDF Data Cube
... other work by Rob Atkinson as well as Peter Baumann
(WCS)
... probably same meaning, but in some cases "dimension" is
reduced to coordinate dimension
... but, e.g., "species" can be a dimension, too
AndreaPerego: Please provide a link to the Data Cube definition
ChrisLittle: Will do
AndreaPerego: I will add candidates for discussion in my fork so we can discuss it
ChrisLittle: This is raised also in the OGC as it is relevant for map services
Linda: so this action will not be ready for the next release
AndreaPerego: probably yes, but it should be ready for the next release
Linda: None working on BP1, so
this will not be part of the sprint
... ACTION-240 Remove BP17 (crowdsourcing) from BP document is
done. Some text has been moved elsewhere (BP1)
... ... in examples
... ... also ready for review
Linda: task on Ed and Phil
... ... progress is unclear
... Recap - most issues are done and wait for review
... when should we freeze? Proposal: Monday morning (would
include actions 248, but not 249, 241 unclear)
... ... thoughts?
<AndreaPerego> +1 to ClemensPortele
ClemensPortele: I think we should stick to our time plan
<ChrisLittle> +1 to freeze
PROPOSAL: Freeze edits on Monday morning
<AndreaPerego> +1
<Linda> +1
<ClemensPortele> +1
Action Linda to update BP sprint plan accordingly
<trackbot> Created ACTION-262 - Update bp sprint plan accordingly [on Linda van den Brink - due 2017-02-08].
Linda: next week to next f2f
meeting
... See backlog
https://www.w3.org/2015/spatial/wiki/Detailed_planning_BP_document#Backlog_-_To_do
... highest priority comes first in the list
... BP1 was discussed in London and we need address the points
made there
... ... see https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/520
... ... discussion probably needs a larger group than we have
today, but it should be in the next sprint
<ClemensPortele> +1
<Linda> +1
<AndreaPerego> +1
<ChrisLittle> +1
<ScottSimmons> +1
Linda: Next one for the next
sprint would be BP10 (spatial semantics). A choice between
vocabularies, or a good method for selecting the right
vocabulary for a specific use, is needed. See https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/39
and https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/214.
... ... should be in the next sprint, too
<ClemensPortele> +1
<Linda> +1
<ChrisLittle> +1
<AndreaPerego> +1
Linda: One question is who wants to work on BP10 and has ideas?
AndreaPerego: This is general and affects also how we select how we represent geometries
Linda: The work on the spatial ontology will take longer than the BP work
AndreaPerego: Then we should show
how things are done today (examples)
... ... will make a proposal in the ongoing work on BP8
Linda: currently no owner for
BP10, but we agree it is a key issue
... Anyone willing to own BP1?
(silence)
Linda: Next is BP2 (provide
context required to interpret data values, https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/384)
... ... can it be removed, covered by DWBP already?
... ... could also be in a future spint
... Also no owner at the moment
<ChrisLittle> My ACTION: here is the link to the W3C RDF (non) definition of Dimensions: http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/
Linda: Next is chapter 11 (how to use these best practices, https://github.com/w3c/sdw/issues/381)
<AndreaPerego> Thanks, ChrisLittle !
Linda: Any topic on the backlog where we have a volunteer?
tidoust: question on the time
line - based on the current plan after this spring there will
mainly be editorial changes
... ... so everything where we do not have a volunteer for the
next sprint, we won't get it into the BP document
Linda: yes, this correct - please consider this
Action Linda to send email to the WG to remind everyone to volunteer for the next sprint, otherwise it is in danger of being dropped from the BP document
<trackbot> Created ACTION-263 - Send email to the wg to remind everyone to volunteer for the next sprint, otherwise it is in danger of being dropped from the bp document [on Linda van den Brink - due 2017-02-08].