See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 21 May 2014
<janina> Meeting: PFWG telecon
<janina> agenda: this
<scribe> scribe: JF
JS: any news items before we get started?
RS: will be presenting on ePub on the Digital Publishing Forum
<richardschwerdtfeger> http://idpf.org/digital-book-2014
RS: 28th and 29th - next week
JS: would be interesting to see any media or PPT about this
RS: will be able to share a deck after the fact. Lots of companies are expressing interest in this. Many businesses are reporting that thier clients *hate* dealing with the PDF plugin
the biggest issue is for the companies to switch over
RS: some banks are starting to look at this. Take your banking history and convert it to an ePub format, and clients can read it without using a plugin
and it can be made more accessible
RS: IBM is creating a white paper on this, and hope to be able to share this soon
JS: any other 2 minute
items?
... any edits to the minutes from last week?
RESOLUTION: publish minutes as submitted
JS: no news at this time. hope to see schedule "soon", but no indication when
MC: announced to the team
MC: reminder to JF - TTML images discussion
ACTION 1433 on MC
<trackbot> Error finding '1433'. You can review and register nicknames at <https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/users>.
MC: still working on action 1433
<MichaelC> close action-1431
<trackbot> Closed action-1431.
MC: looking at action 1431 -
close it
... big action on cyns, rich, lisa on security
RS: haven't done it yet
MC: last call on that is 18
june
... thats it for currents
... there are some CSS ones we are tracking
JS: new publications, etc.?
<MichaelC> HTML Canvas 2D Context
MC: only new Last Call is HTML
Canvas 2d context
... that's it for this week
<MichaelC> Robustness and Archiving CG
JS: new community groups?
MC: one - robustness and archiving
JF: perhaps somebody in the Coga TF might be interested in watching this Community Group
MC: can put this on the list of ones to watch
<MichaelC> DRAFT SVG A11Y TF Work Statement
JS: where are we regarding best prtactices and authoring guide
RS: beleive matt king and james nurthem are on that
JN: not yet ready for working on now
MC: believe yo cn start now, some bugs, but nothing huge
JN: was waiting for the update, next up will decide an action plan / meeting schedules / etc.
JS: discussion on editors and Jason Kiss offer
RS: what is time commitment asked for?
JS: 1 day / week
... Jason can only provide 1/2 day
RS: feels a bit unrealistic
JS: don't think we will get
anyone prepared to give a full dy a week
... likely need to discuss further
... the other question is - what repository does the work live
in? Chairs said to talk to the editors of HTML
... finally...
at some point we will need to do for ARIA is create a formal TF, with a work statement, etc.
JS: P for 1.1 we need to get the paperwork better aligned
RS: will work with Michael on that
JS: not a pressure thing, just a close the loop item
RS: were are we at the charter discussion?
MC: need to look at my
notes
... goal is to go to the AC before 2nd week of June
... so hopefully week of June 2nd - subject to 1 month
review
JS; so hopefully we will have results by July 4th
MC: may not be in effect
immeadiately, as there are usually some last minute
cleanups
... but early July should be doable - but don't want to
commit
JS: nothing specific
... a small concern at the html tf how long it is taking to
close off items
... nothing we can really do here however
MC: is it a concensus question?
JS: no, more to do with availability of individuals
MC: editorial bottleneck?
JS: yes
discussion on status of HTML5.0
JS: we need to discuss
flex-box
... believe we were going to do this in public
MC: feel ackward in putting draft reviews in public - not a major violation but it feels messy
<MichaelC> Flexbox redrafted review
MC: cys review included some
comments that weren't taht interesting to this group
... one item around reflow; the balance was mostly around WCAG
techniques, etc.
JS: indication WCAG Techniques is good
MC: as long as we indicate we do not expect formal response to those suggestions
JS: any objections to sending this as a PF response
RESOLUTION: PF approves sending the response at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-pfwg/2014May/0066.html as an official response from this group
JS: a few others that have been
languishing, but we should review
... the other items on the agenda - no apparent actions
... propose we end early
... ajorned