See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 18 March 2014
scribenick johnsim
<plh> scribeNick: johnsim
<paulc> ACTION-61?
<trackbot> ACTION-61 -- Paul Cotton to Work with wendy to make sure we get a security review of eme -- due 2013-12-10 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/61
paulc: no progress due to lack of resources
<paulc> ACTION-62?
<trackbot> ACTION-62 -- Paul Cotton to Report back about the plan for 20944 due 2013-12-15 -- due 2013-12-10 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/media/track/actions/62
This action is pending
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24951
<paulc> Status: Blocks 17673 24673 24873
ddorwin: fell under the discussion with David Singer.
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17673
paulc: 17673 implementation is necessary - and last meeting Adrian agreed to implement 17673
ddorwin: need to fix the new bug 24951 first
David and Adrian need to figure out who is actually going to do the work on 24951
<crickets>
adrianba: 24951 is describing the solution that Adrian is planning for 17673.
Assign 24951 to Adrianba
paulc: deals with agenda item 5a
Subtopic: persistent license
paulc: don't know if there is a bug for this but since there is active discussion...
<paulc> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Mar/0020.html
<ddorwin> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24025
ddorwin: came out of a bug, two
issues - load session with createsession and proposed
persistent attribute is poorly defined
... i have an action to break this bug into separate bugs with
a better proposal for the persistent attribute, outlined in the
email
<ddorwin> 24025 is the bug that started the email thread.
paulc: eight items under this agenda
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24771
paulc: we have those actions done. Adrian, Jerry or John want more time since no clarity on who from MSFT was going to look at this according to the March 4th meeting
Microsoft will review and enter their position in the bug
Subtopic: 24873
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24873
paulc: as far as I know this bug has not been assigned, extensive dialog yesterday on this, can you summarize, David?
<markw> Looks ok to me
paulc: anyone else who wants to review this before we move forward?
looks okay to me
<paulc> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24873#c0
pal: concrete example of how this would work?
ddorwin: examples for key systems and type, but not on capability
<adrianba> i continue to think the idea of an unspecified string is probably going to be problematic
pal: significant change, an attempt what this would look like with common combinations of container, content protection systems
ddorwin: are examples in the bug
paulc: up the priority on 24951
pal: this is suggesting that video - two proposals at the top
ddorwin: the first one is the primary one, not tied to either one of them
paulc: this bug is assigned for implementation to ddorwin
Subtopic: 24874
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24874
<paulc> See https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24874#c1
paulc: best plan to ask for someone to review this?
ddorwin: yes
jdsmith will review
Subtopic: 24904
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24904
paulc: there is a recent update, 24687 was resolved by specifying a copy should be made, in the html5 specification - proposing the same solution?
ddorwin: just an observation
paulc: html5 has decided to take
a copy, does anyone object to doing the same?
... not hearing an objection, should put it on the
implementation list - assigned to ddorwin
based on solution in html5
subtopic: 21798
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21798
paulc: pending, lower priority
subtopic: 24027
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24027
paulc: Mark, ready to be processed?
ddorwin: read this when markw sent it. confused on content
markw: from new version of common encryption spec
ddorwin: will want to review in more detail
johnsim: johnsim will review that also
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24419
depends on https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27682
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17682
awaiting concrete proposal on solution which would have been used in 17682
Subtopic: 24419
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24419
Subtopic: 24673
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24673
depends on 24951
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24951
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/29718/21798/ Found ScribeNick: johnsim Inferring Scribes: johnsim WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Microsoft Status Subtopic adrianba davide ddorwin html-media https jdsmith johnsim joined markw pal paulc pladd plh scribeNick trackbot wseltzer You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2014Mar/0032.html WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 18 Mar 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/03/18-html-media-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]