IRC log of aapi on 2014-02-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 19:59:53 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #aapi
- 19:59:54 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-irc
- 19:59:55 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs member
- 19:59:56 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #aapi
- 19:59:57 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be WAI_PF
- 19:59:58 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM scheduled to start in 1 minute
- 19:59:58 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference
- 19:59:59 [trackbot]
- Date: 11 February 2014
- 20:01:13 [Zakim]
- WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM has now started
- 20:01:20 [Zakim]
- +joanie
- 20:01:22 [Zakim]
- +[GVoice]
- 20:01:45 [clown]
- zakim, GVoice is Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 20:01:45 [Zakim]
- +Joseph_Scheuhammer; got it
- 20:02:15 [clown]
- zakim, I am Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 20:02:15 [Zakim]
- ok, clown, I now associate you with Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 20:02:31 [clown]
- agenda: this
- 20:02:37 [clown]
- agenda+ Finalize discussion of meeting time.
- 20:02:42 [clown]
- agenda+ ACTION-1383: (All) Add role none to ARIA spec.
- 20:02:51 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-441/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Test case for incomplete use of aria-posinset/aria-setsize.
- 20:03:01 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal.
- 20:03:09 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy.
- 20:03:18 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container.
- 20:03:24 [clown]
- agenda+ ISSUE-635/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Create test case for rowgroup role.
- 20:03:32 [clown]
- agenda+ 1.1 ISSUES and ACTIONS: (All) Start with ISSUE-540, https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/23
- 20:03:38 [clown]
- agenda+ be done
- 20:11:10 [clown]
- zakim, who's here?
- 20:11:10 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see joanie, Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 20:11:11 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, clown, joanie, davidb, trackbot
- 20:11:53 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown
- 20:12:20 [clown]
- chair: Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 20:12:27 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown
- 20:13:17 [joanie]
- Zakim, agenda?
- 20:13:17 [Zakim]
- I see 9 items remaining on the agenda:
- 20:13:18 [Zakim]
- 1. Finalize discussion of meeting time. [from clown]
- 20:13:18 [Zakim]
- 2. ACTION-1383: (All) Add role none to ARIA spec. [from clown]
- 20:13:18 [Zakim]
- 3. ISSUE-441/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Test case for incomplete use of aria-posinset/aria-setsize. [from clown]
- 20:13:18 [Zakim]
- 4. ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal. [from clown]
- 20:13:20 [Zakim]
- 5. ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy. [from clown]
- 20:13:20 [Zakim]
- 6. ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container. [from clown]
- 20:13:20 [Zakim]
- 7. ISSUE-635/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Create test case for rowgroup role. [from clown]
- 20:13:20 [Zakim]
- 8. 1.1 ISSUES and ACTIONS: (All) Start with ISSUE-540, https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/23 [from clown]
- 20:13:23 [Zakim]
- 9. be done [from clown]
- 20:13:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown
- 20:16:29 [clown]
- zakim, save agenda
- 20:16:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown
- 20:16:35 [Zakim]
- ok, clown, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-agenda.rdf
- 20:16:44 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown
- 20:19:23 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 20:19:53 [cyns]
- cyns has joined #aapi
- 20:20:16 [clown]
- scribenick: joanie
- 20:20:37 [clown]
- zakim, take up 6
- 20:20:37 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'take up 6', clown
- 20:20:48 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 6
- 20:20:48 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container." taken up [from clown]
- 20:21:00 [clown]
- issue-618?
- 20:21:00 [trackbot]
- issue-618 -- MSAA selection event mapping for single selection case when item becomes unselected -- open
- 20:21:00 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/618
- 20:21:22 [joanie]
- CS: Is halfway through the test case and hopes to have it done today.
- 20:21:40 [joanie]
- CS: All of her action items are to make a test case and see what IE does.
- 20:22:18 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up 1
- 20:22:18 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'take up 1', joanie
- 20:22:22 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 1
- 20:22:22 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Finalize discussion of meeting time." taken up [from clown]
- 20:22:43 [joanie]
- JS: Nothing is likely to change w.r.t. the meeting time
- 20:23:09 [joanie]
- JS: Either continue meeting at 3:00-4:00 or 3:15-4:15 PM Eastern Time
- 20:23:24 [joanie]
- CS: Thinks she can do 3:15.
- 20:24:11 [joanie]
- JS: Let's make it at 3:15-4:15, but we'll check with David when he arrives.
- 20:24:22 [joanie]
- CS: Won't be here next week.
- 20:24:31 [joanie]
- JS: Will be here.
- 20:25:54 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 2
- 20:25:54 [Zakim]
- agendum 2. "ACTION-1383: (All) Add role none to ARIA spec." taken up [from clown]
- 20:26:06 [clown]
- action-1383?
- 20:26:06 [trackbot]
- action-1383 -- James Craig to Add role none to spec -- due 2014-02-17 -- OPEN
- 20:26:06 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1383
- 20:26:17 [joanie]
- JS: Just a heads up for those who were not at Monday's meeting.
- 20:26:24 [joanie]
- JS: Create discussion.
- 20:26:33 [joanie]
- JS: James Craig has an action to add it to the spec.
- 20:26:54 [joanie]
- JS: My understanding is it will duplicate what is in role=presentation
- 20:27:17 [clown]
- <img alt="" ...>
- 20:28:00 [clown]
- <img role="presentation" ...>
- 20:28:26 [clown]
- <img role="presentation" alt="some text here" …>
- 20:28:36 [clown]
- the last one is an author error.
- 20:29:10 [joanie]
- JS: Explains the above examples
- 20:29:26 [joanie]
- JS: Explained that the first two examples are equivalent. This is in ARIA 1.0
- 20:29:34 [clown]
- <img role="none" aria-label="some text here">
- 20:29:46 [joanie]
- JS: Heard at monday's meeting that they are considering doing the above.
- 20:29:58 [cyns]
- that seems wrong...
- 20:30:52 [joanie]
- JD: Recalled from Monday that there may be the possibility of <img role="text" alt="foo">
- 20:31:32 [joanie]
- JS: conclusion is role="none" is going forward.
- 20:31:53 [joanie]
- Zakim, next item
- 20:31:53 [Zakim]
- agendum 1. "Finalize discussion of meeting time." taken up [from clown]
- 20:32:00 [joanie]
- Zakim, item 3
- 20:32:00 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'item 3', joanie
- 20:32:04 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 3
- 20:32:04 [Zakim]
- agendum 3. "ISSUE-441/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Test case for incomplete use of aria-posinset/aria-setsize." taken up [from clown]
- 20:32:14 [clown]
- issue-441?
- 20:32:14 [trackbot]
- issue-441 -- Normative UAIG requirements for what UAs do when aria-posinset or aria-setsize is provided explicitly on some, but not all, elements within a set. -- open
- 20:32:14 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/441
- 20:32:32 [joanie]
- JS + CS: Cynthia is working on it
- 20:32:47 [joanie]
- JS: Are you doing a list box?
- 20:32:55 [joanie]
- CS: Yes.
- 20:33:07 [joanie]
- CS: is modifying test case 672.
- 20:33:30 [clown]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=1&testcase_id=672
- 20:34:00 [joanie]
- JS: This is for selection; not setsize
- 20:34:34 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 4
- 20:34:34 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal." taken up [from clown]
- 20:34:55 [joanie]
- JS: Cynthia has this in progress.
- 20:35:04 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 5
- 20:35:04 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy." taken up [from clown]
- 20:35:17 [clown]
- issue-612?
- 20:35:17 [trackbot]
- issue-612 -- Review ia2/atk rule in group position. should this really determine level based on aria-owns chain. see uaig: http://www.w3.org/wai/pf/aria-implementation/#mapping_additional_position and test case 69: https://www.w3.org/wai/pf/testharness/testresults?tes -- open
- 20:35:18 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/612
- 20:35:20 [joanie]
- JS: That one is his.
- 20:36:15 [clown]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/test?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=69&platform_id=4
- 20:37:10 [joanie]
- JS: Explains what they did was a bunch of sibling div elements
- 20:37:14 [clown]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testresults?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=69
- 20:37:18 [clown]
- test report ^
- 20:37:20 [joanie]
- JS: But they used aria-owns to create a tree
- 20:37:50 [joanie]
- JS: There is a mozilla bug on it.
- 20:37:50 [clown]
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499917
- 20:38:46 [Zakim]
- +[Mozilla]
- 20:38:48 [davidb]
- Zakim, Mozilla is David_Bolter
- 20:38:48 [Zakim]
- +David_Bolter; got it
- 20:39:49 [joanie]
- JS: Rewinds for David
- 20:40:03 [joanie]
- JS: Meeting will be from 3:15-4:15
- 20:40:16 [joanie]
- DB: Agrees this is fine, but he may need to leave early
- 20:40:44 [joanie]
- JS: The meeting time will be from 3:00 - 4:15
- 20:40:58 [joanie]
- JS: Hopefully David will be able to arrive at 3:00
- 20:41:12 [joanie]
- JS: Cynthia hopefully will be able to arrive at 3:15
- 20:41:23 [joanie]
- JS: Mozilla stuff first then together stuff then IE stuff
- 20:41:45 [joanie]
- JS: Reviews the role="presentation" discussion.
- 20:42:08 [joanie]
- JS: If Mozilla has objections....
- 20:42:18 [joanie]
- DB: He doesn't. He's going to file the bug and find out.
- 20:42:43 [joanie]
- JS: Stefan wanted to use role="layout" for layout tables
- 20:43:03 [joanie]
- JS: ... but for images that are decorative
- 20:43:11 [joanie]
- JS: ... something like role="decorative"
- 20:43:29 [joanie]
- JS: Feel was we don't want a bunch of roles that do the same thing
- 20:43:42 [joanie]
- JS: For the record, he wanted it to be role="content"
- 20:44:00 [joanie]
- s/"content"/"contents"/
- 20:44:23 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown
- 20:44:49 [clown]
- <table role="contents" …>
- 20:45:26 [joanie]
- DS: I don't think Web Devs would assume that is what it means
- 20:45:47 [joanie]
- JS: I wanted to focus on 'expose the contents'
- 20:46:12 [joanie]
- DS: I saw enough of the dialog and thinks we can go with role="none"
- 20:46:26 [joanie]
- JS: Already seen a tweet that means it will remove everything
- 20:46:31 [joanie]
- DS: There will be confusion
- 20:46:36 [joanie]
- JS: Then we aren't solving the problem
- 20:46:49 [joanie]
- DS: Is this something that is consensus from the Monday meeting?
- 20:47:14 [joanie]
- JS: Basically it's a let's write it up and see what it looks like
- 20:47:40 [clown]
- s/DS:/DB:/g
- 20:47:44 [joanie]
- s/DS/DB/g
- 20:47:45 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown
- 20:47:49 [davidb]
- I just filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=971212 for role=none Moz debate.
- 20:48:19 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 6
- 20:48:19 [Zakim]
- agendum 6. "ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container." taken up [from clown]
- 20:48:27 [joanie]
- agenda?
- 20:48:35 [joanie]
- Zakim, take up item 4
- 20:48:35 [Zakim]
- agendum 4. "ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal." taken up [from clown]
- 20:48:42 [clown]
- issue-481?
- 20:48:43 [trackbot]
- issue-481 -- aria-live removal events should or must happen before object removal -- open
- 20:48:43 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/481
- 20:48:48 [joanie]
- JS: David you weren't here last week
- 20:48:57 [clown]
- action-1369?
- 20:48:57 [trackbot]
- action-1369 -- David Bolter to Investigate implementation of aria-live region events in FF -- due 2014-02-11 -- OPEN
- 20:48:57 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1369
- 20:49:00 [joanie]
- JS: Cynthia and I gave you an action
- 20:49:12 [joanie]
- DB: I acknowledge the issue
- 20:49:49 [joanie]
- JS: quoting from issue-481
- 20:50:16 [joanie]
- JS: He wants that 'should' changed to a 'must'
- 20:50:31 [joanie]
- JS: That's what I take it to mean
- 20:51:02 [joanie]
- JS: I leave it to you guys
- 20:51:20 [joanie]
- DB: Cynthia do you have an opinion on 1369 about the order of removal eventes
- 20:51:37 [joanie]
- CS: I understand why he thinks this. I don't know how hard it will be to do it.
- 20:51:53 [joanie]
- JS: That's why you two have issues
- 20:52:02 [joanie]
- CS: Is there anyone from Google?
- 20:52:09 [joanie]
- DB: Dominic Mazzoni
- 20:53:47 [joanie]
- DB: Going to stay one the phone, but everything is bogging down here
- 20:54:20 [joanie]
- zakim, take up item 5
- 20:54:20 [Zakim]
- agendum 5. "ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy." taken up [from clown]
- 20:54:24 [clown]
- issue-612?
- 20:54:24 [trackbot]
- issue-612 -- Review ia2/atk rule in group position. should this really determine level based on aria-owns chain. see uaig: http://www.w3.org/wai/pf/aria-implementation/#mapping_additional_position and test case 69: https://www.w3.org/wai/pf/testharness/testresults?tes -- open
- 20:54:25 [trackbot]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/612
- 20:54:39 [joanie]
- JS: There's a mozilla bug on it too
- 20:54:42 [clown]
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499917
- 20:55:00 [joanie]
- JS: Looks like Alex wants to keep it
- 20:55:17 [joanie]
- JS: Our issue in the test case is that there are div element siblings
- 20:55:26 [joanie]
- JS: but there is a hierarchy do to aria-owns
- 20:55:35 [joanie]
- JS: and the test case fails
- 20:55:36 [clown]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testresults?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=69
- 20:55:58 [joanie]
- JS: Who raised the issue?
- 20:56:06 [joanie]
- JS: It doesn't say who.
- 20:56:19 [joanie]
- JS: I think Rich and James together suggested getting rid of this
- 20:56:33 [joanie]
- JS: quoting text
- 20:56:37 [clown]
- "If aria-level is not provided or inherited for an element of role treeitem, user agents implementing IAccessible2 or ATK/AT-SPI MUST compute it by following the explicit or computed RELATION_NODE_CHILD_OF relations"
- 20:56:45 [joanie]
- JS: end of quote
- 20:57:11 [joanie]
- JS: And we discussed this last october?
- 20:57:24 [joanie]
- JS: And Alex asked why to remove this requirement
- 20:57:28 [joanie]
- DB: Did we?
- 20:57:40 [joanie]
- JS: It should be up in today's w3c notes
- 20:57:46 [joanie]
- JS: Reading discussion
- 20:57:51 [davidb_]
- davidb_ has joined #aapi
- 20:57:57 [joanie]
- DB: I don't recall
- 20:58:11 [clown]
- alex first said: "Can you outline why they decided to remove the requirement?"
- 20:58:18 [davidb_]
- back!
- 20:58:32 [clown]
- and later aske: "so no strong reasons to drop it?"
- 20:58:41 [clown]
- s/aske:/asked:/
- 20:59:12 [joanie]
- JS: I get the impression that Alex sees no reason to get rid of this.
- 20:59:27 [joanie]
- JS: I think what I want you to do is restart the discussion with him
- 20:59:29 [joanie]
- DB: OK
- 20:59:37 [joanie]
- JS: Because it's both IA2 and ATK
- 20:59:56 [clown]
- https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pfwg/raw-file/default/ARIA-UAIG/1.0/tests/test-files/test69.html
- 21:00:00 [joanie]
- JS: Michael Cooper acknowledged it's a kinda crazy way to do a tree
- 21:00:21 [joanie]
- JS: ... but there's nothing in the spec that says it's illegal
- 21:00:38 [clown]
- s/kinda crazy/kinda odd/
- 21:01:27 [joanie]
- JS: David, can you see the markup?
- 21:01:40 [joanie]
- DB: They're all sibling divs
- 21:01:52 [joanie]
- JS: Goes on to explain the tree structure that results
- 21:01:59 [joanie]
- JS: And the test case....
- 21:02:13 [joanie]
- JS: ... says "The level of the last tree item is 2"
- 21:02:27 [joanie]
- JS: ... When you run the test the level is not 2
- 21:02:33 [joanie]
- JS: IE wasn't tested
- 21:02:37 [joanie]
- JS: Only Safari
- 21:02:49 [joanie]
- JS: James Craig wasn't certain what the result is
- 21:03:11 [joanie]
- JS: Rich tested it on windows firefox
- 21:03:20 [joanie]
- JS: ... and set it failed, but didn't say how it failed
- 21:03:27 [joanie]
- JS: Cynthia, can you run a test case?
- 21:03:45 [clown]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=1&testcase_id=69
- 21:03:58 [joanie]
- JS: Here's the full test case (above)?
- 21:04:24 [joanie]
- JS: Questions if that is the right test case.
- 21:04:28 [clown]
- https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=69
- 21:04:33 [joanie]
- CS: also questions it
- 21:04:44 [joanie]
- JS: quotes the test expected results
- 21:04:50 [joanie]
- CS: I'll find out
- 21:05:06 [joanie]
- JS: I don't know how you represent level in IE
- 21:05:59 [joanie]
- JS: I can't recall how it is in Firefox ATK
- 21:06:04 [joanie]
- JD: It's an object attribute
- 21:06:12 [joanie]
- (more discussion on the test case)
- 21:06:51 [joanie]
- CS: In IE I'm not seeing an explicit API property of level
- 21:06:58 [joanie]
- CS: But I am seeing it in the tree
- 21:07:10 [joanie]
- CS: It's doing what I expect (it == IE)
- 21:07:23 [joanie]
- JS: Adds a note to the issue
- 21:07:35 [joanie]
- CS: Is there a way to attach a screenshot to the issue
- 21:07:46 [joanie]
- JS: I think you have to send an email to the issue
- 21:08:20 [joanie]
- CS: I'm wrong, the tree does not own it.
- 21:08:30 [joanie]
- JS and CS: So it fails on IE.
- 21:09:02 [joanie]
- CS: It's challenging to look at some of these test cases in API tools.
- 21:09:23 [joanie]
- JS: David you have enough to go forward?
- 21:09:25 [joanie]
- DB: I do.
- 21:09:36 [clown]
- zakim, agenda?
- 21:09:36 [Zakim]
- I see 8 items remaining on the agenda:
- 21:09:37 [Zakim]
- 1. Finalize discussion of meeting time. [from clown]
- 21:09:37 [Zakim]
- 3. ISSUE-441/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Test case for incomplete use of aria-posinset/aria-setsize. [from clown]
- 21:09:37 [Zakim]
- 4. ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal. [from clown]
- 21:09:37 [Zakim]
- 5. ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy. [from clown]
- 21:09:39 [Zakim]
- 6. ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container. [from clown]
- 21:09:39 [Zakim]
- 7. ISSUE-635/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Create test case for rowgroup role. [from clown]
- 21:09:39 [Zakim]
- 8. 1.1 ISSUES and ACTIONS: (All) Start with ISSUE-540, https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/23 [from clown]
- 21:09:39 [Zakim]
- 9. be done [from clown]
- 21:10:18 [Zakim]
- -David_Bolter
- 21:10:28 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft]
- 21:11:20 [joanie]
- RRSAgent, stop log
- 21:11:20 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'stop log', joanie. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 21:12:16 [joanie]
- RRSAgent, stop
- 21:15:25 [clown]
- present: joanie, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Cynthia_Shelly, David_Bolter
- 21:15:34 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown