19:59:53 RRSAgent has joined #aapi 19:59:54 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-irc 19:59:55 RRSAgent, make logs member 19:59:56 Zakim has joined #aapi 19:59:57 Zakim, this will be WAI_PF 19:59:58 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM scheduled to start in 1 minute 19:59:58 Meeting: Protocols and Formats Working Group Teleconference 19:59:59 Date: 11 February 2014 20:01:13 WAI_PFWG(AAPI)3:00PM has now started 20:01:20 +joanie 20:01:22 +[GVoice] 20:01:45 zakim, GVoice is Joseph_Scheuhammer 20:01:45 +Joseph_Scheuhammer; got it 20:02:15 zakim, I am Joseph_Scheuhammer 20:02:15 ok, clown, I now associate you with Joseph_Scheuhammer 20:02:31 agenda: this 20:02:37 agenda+ Finalize discussion of meeting time. 20:02:42 agenda+ ACTION-1383: (All) Add role none to ARIA spec. 20:02:51 agenda+ ISSUE-441/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Test case for incomplete use of aria-posinset/aria-setsize. 20:03:01 agenda+ ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal. 20:03:09 agenda+ ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy. 20:03:18 agenda+ ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container. 20:03:24 agenda+ ISSUE-635/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Create test case for rowgroup role. 20:03:32 agenda+ 1.1 ISSUES and ACTIONS: (All) Start with ISSUE-540, https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/23 20:03:38 agenda+ be done 20:11:10 zakim, who's here? 20:11:10 On the phone I see joanie, Joseph_Scheuhammer 20:11:11 On IRC I see RRSAgent, clown, joanie, davidb, trackbot 20:11:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown 20:12:20 chair: Joseph_Scheuhammer 20:12:27 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown 20:13:17 Zakim, agenda? 20:13:17 I see 9 items remaining on the agenda: 20:13:18 1. Finalize discussion of meeting time. [from clown] 20:13:18 2. ACTION-1383: (All) Add role none to ARIA spec. [from clown] 20:13:18 3. ISSUE-441/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Test case for incomplete use of aria-posinset/aria-setsize. [from clown] 20:13:18 4. ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal. [from clown] 20:13:20 5. ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy. [from clown] 20:13:20 6. ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container. [from clown] 20:13:20 7. ISSUE-635/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Create test case for rowgroup role. [from clown] 20:13:20 8. 1.1 ISSUES and ACTIONS: (All) Start with ISSUE-540, https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/23 [from clown] 20:13:23 9. be done [from clown] 20:13:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown 20:16:29 zakim, save agenda 20:16:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown 20:16:35 ok, clown, the agenda has been written to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-agenda.rdf 20:16:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown 20:19:23 +[Microsoft] 20:19:53 cyns has joined #aapi 20:20:16 scribenick: joanie 20:20:37 zakim, take up 6 20:20:37 I don't understand 'take up 6', clown 20:20:48 Zakim, take up item 6 20:20:48 agendum 6. "ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container." taken up [from clown] 20:21:00 issue-618? 20:21:00 issue-618 -- MSAA selection event mapping for single selection case when item becomes unselected -- open 20:21:00 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/618 20:21:22 CS: Is halfway through the test case and hopes to have it done today. 20:21:40 CS: All of her action items are to make a test case and see what IE does. 20:22:18 Zakim, take up 1 20:22:18 I don't understand 'take up 1', joanie 20:22:22 Zakim, take up item 1 20:22:22 agendum 1. "Finalize discussion of meeting time." taken up [from clown] 20:22:43 JS: Nothing is likely to change w.r.t. the meeting time 20:23:09 JS: Either continue meeting at 3:00-4:00 or 3:15-4:15 PM Eastern Time 20:23:24 CS: Thinks she can do 3:15. 20:24:11 JS: Let's make it at 3:15-4:15, but we'll check with David when he arrives. 20:24:22 CS: Won't be here next week. 20:24:31 JS: Will be here. 20:25:54 Zakim, take up item 2 20:25:54 agendum 2. "ACTION-1383: (All) Add role none to ARIA spec." taken up [from clown] 20:26:06 action-1383? 20:26:06 action-1383 -- James Craig to Add role none to spec -- due 2014-02-17 -- OPEN 20:26:06 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1383 20:26:17 JS: Just a heads up for those who were not at Monday's meeting. 20:26:24 JS: Create discussion. 20:26:33 JS: James Craig has an action to add it to the spec. 20:26:54 JS: My understanding is it will duplicate what is in role=presentation 20:27:17 20:28:00 20:28:26 some text here 20:28:36 the last one is an author error. 20:29:10 JS: Explains the above examples 20:29:26 JS: Explained that the first two examples are equivalent. This is in ARIA 1.0 20:29:34 20:29:46 JS: Heard at monday's meeting that they are considering doing the above. 20:29:58 that seems wrong... 20:30:52 JD: Recalled from Monday that there may be the possibility of foo 20:31:32 JS: conclusion is role="none" is going forward. 20:31:53 Zakim, next item 20:31:53 agendum 1. "Finalize discussion of meeting time." taken up [from clown] 20:32:00 Zakim, item 3 20:32:00 I don't understand 'item 3', joanie 20:32:04 Zakim, take up item 3 20:32:04 agendum 3. "ISSUE-441/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Test case for incomplete use of aria-posinset/aria-setsize." taken up [from clown] 20:32:14 issue-441? 20:32:14 issue-441 -- Normative UAIG requirements for what UAs do when aria-posinset or aria-setsize is provided explicitly on some, but not all, elements within a set. -- open 20:32:14 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/441 20:32:32 JS + CS: Cynthia is working on it 20:32:47 JS: Are you doing a list box? 20:32:55 CS: Yes. 20:33:07 CS: is modifying test case 672. 20:33:30 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=1&testcase_id=672 20:34:00 JS: This is for selection; not setsize 20:34:34 Zakim, take up item 4 20:34:34 agendum 4. "ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal." taken up [from clown] 20:34:55 JS: Cynthia has this in progress. 20:35:04 Zakim, take up item 5 20:35:04 agendum 5. "ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy." taken up [from clown] 20:35:17 issue-612? 20:35:17 issue-612 -- Review ia2/atk rule in group position. should this really determine level based on aria-owns chain. see uaig: http://www.w3.org/wai/pf/aria-implementation/#mapping_additional_position and test case 69: https://www.w3.org/wai/pf/testharness/testresults?tes -- open 20:35:18 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/612 20:35:20 JS: That one is his. 20:36:15 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/test?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=69&platform_id=4 20:37:10 JS: Explains what they did was a bunch of sibling div elements 20:37:14 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testresults?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=69 20:37:18 test report ^ 20:37:20 JS: But they used aria-owns to create a tree 20:37:50 JS: There is a mozilla bug on it. 20:37:50 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499917 20:38:46 +[Mozilla] 20:38:48 Zakim, Mozilla is David_Bolter 20:38:48 +David_Bolter; got it 20:39:49 JS: Rewinds for David 20:40:03 JS: Meeting will be from 3:15-4:15 20:40:16 DB: Agrees this is fine, but he may need to leave early 20:40:44 JS: The meeting time will be from 3:00 - 4:15 20:40:58 JS: Hopefully David will be able to arrive at 3:00 20:41:12 JS: Cynthia hopefully will be able to arrive at 3:15 20:41:23 JS: Mozilla stuff first then together stuff then IE stuff 20:41:45 JS: Reviews the role="presentation" discussion. 20:42:08 JS: If Mozilla has objections.... 20:42:18 DB: He doesn't. He's going to file the bug and find out. 20:42:43 JS: Stefan wanted to use role="layout" for layout tables 20:43:03 JS: ... but for images that are decorative 20:43:11 JS: ... something like role="decorative" 20:43:29 JS: Feel was we don't want a bunch of roles that do the same thing 20:43:42 JS: For the record, he wanted it to be role="content" 20:44:00 s/"content"/"contents"/ 20:44:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown 20:44:49 20:45:26 DS: I don't think Web Devs would assume that is what it means 20:45:47 JS: I wanted to focus on 'expose the contents' 20:46:12 DS: I saw enough of the dialog and thinks we can go with role="none" 20:46:26 JS: Already seen a tweet that means it will remove everything 20:46:31 DS: There will be confusion 20:46:36 JS: Then we aren't solving the problem 20:46:49 DS: Is this something that is consensus from the Monday meeting? 20:47:14 JS: Basically it's a let's write it up and see what it looks like 20:47:40 s/DS:/DB:/g 20:47:44 s/DS/DB/g 20:47:45 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown 20:47:49 I just filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=971212 for role=none Moz debate. 20:48:19 Zakim, take up item 6 20:48:19 agendum 6. "ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container." taken up [from clown] 20:48:27 agenda? 20:48:35 Zakim, take up item 4 20:48:35 agendum 4. "ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal." taken up [from clown] 20:48:42 issue-481? 20:48:43 issue-481 -- aria-live removal events should or must happen before object removal -- open 20:48:43 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/481 20:48:48 JS: David you weren't here last week 20:48:57 action-1369? 20:48:57 action-1369 -- David Bolter to Investigate implementation of aria-live region events in FF -- due 2014-02-11 -- OPEN 20:48:57 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1369 20:49:00 JS: Cynthia and I gave you an action 20:49:12 DB: I acknowledge the issue 20:49:49 JS: quoting from issue-481 20:50:16 JS: He wants that 'should' changed to a 'must' 20:50:31 JS: That's what I take it to mean 20:51:02 JS: I leave it to you guys 20:51:20 DB: Cynthia do you have an opinion on 1369 about the order of removal eventes 20:51:37 CS: I understand why he thinks this. I don't know how hard it will be to do it. 20:51:53 JS: That's why you two have issues 20:52:02 CS: Is there anyone from Google? 20:52:09 DB: Dominic Mazzoni 20:53:47 DB: Going to stay one the phone, but everything is bogging down here 20:54:20 zakim, take up item 5 20:54:20 agendum 5. "ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy." taken up [from clown] 20:54:24 issue-612? 20:54:24 issue-612 -- Review ia2/atk rule in group position. should this really determine level based on aria-owns chain. see uaig: http://www.w3.org/wai/pf/aria-implementation/#mapping_additional_position and test case 69: https://www.w3.org/wai/pf/testharness/testresults?tes -- open 20:54:25 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/612 20:54:39 JS: There's a mozilla bug on it too 20:54:42 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499917 20:55:00 JS: Looks like Alex wants to keep it 20:55:17 JS: Our issue in the test case is that there are div element siblings 20:55:26 JS: but there is a hierarchy do to aria-owns 20:55:35 JS: and the test case fails 20:55:36 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testresults?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=69 20:55:58 JS: Who raised the issue? 20:56:06 JS: It doesn't say who. 20:56:19 JS: I think Rich and James together suggested getting rid of this 20:56:33 JS: quoting text 20:56:37 "If aria-level is not provided or inherited for an element of role treeitem, user agents implementing IAccessible2 or ATK/AT-SPI MUST compute it by following the explicit or computed RELATION_NODE_CHILD_OF relations" 20:56:45 JS: end of quote 20:57:11 JS: And we discussed this last october? 20:57:24 JS: And Alex asked why to remove this requirement 20:57:28 DB: Did we? 20:57:40 JS: It should be up in today's w3c notes 20:57:46 JS: Reading discussion 20:57:51 davidb_ has joined #aapi 20:57:57 DB: I don't recall 20:58:11 alex first said: "Can you outline why they decided to remove the requirement?" 20:58:18 back! 20:58:32 and later aske: "so no strong reasons to drop it?" 20:58:41 s/aske:/asked:/ 20:59:12 JS: I get the impression that Alex sees no reason to get rid of this. 20:59:27 JS: I think what I want you to do is restart the discussion with him 20:59:29 DB: OK 20:59:37 JS: Because it's both IA2 and ATK 20:59:56 https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/pfwg/raw-file/default/ARIA-UAIG/1.0/tests/test-files/test69.html 21:00:00 JS: Michael Cooper acknowledged it's a kinda crazy way to do a tree 21:00:21 JS: ... but there's nothing in the spec that says it's illegal 21:00:38 s/kinda crazy/kinda odd/ 21:01:27 JS: David, can you see the markup? 21:01:40 DB: They're all sibling divs 21:01:52 JS: Goes on to explain the tree structure that results 21:01:59 JS: And the test case.... 21:02:13 JS: ... says "The level of the last tree item is 2" 21:02:27 JS: ... When you run the test the level is not 2 21:02:33 JS: IE wasn't tested 21:02:37 JS: Only Safari 21:02:49 JS: James Craig wasn't certain what the result is 21:03:11 JS: Rich tested it on windows firefox 21:03:20 JS: ... and set it failed, but didn't say how it failed 21:03:27 JS: Cynthia, can you run a test case? 21:03:45 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=1&testcase_id=69 21:03:58 JS: Here's the full test case (above)? 21:04:24 JS: Questions if that is the right test case. 21:04:28 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/testharness/testcases/edit?testsuite_id=2&testcase_id=69 21:04:33 CS: also questions it 21:04:44 JS: quotes the test expected results 21:04:50 CS: I'll find out 21:05:06 JS: I don't know how you represent level in IE 21:05:59 JS: I can't recall how it is in Firefox ATK 21:06:04 JD: It's an object attribute 21:06:12 (more discussion on the test case) 21:06:51 CS: In IE I'm not seeing an explicit API property of level 21:06:58 CS: But I am seeing it in the tree 21:07:10 CS: It's doing what I expect (it == IE) 21:07:23 JS: Adds a note to the issue 21:07:35 CS: Is there a way to attach a screenshot to the issue 21:07:46 JS: I think you have to send an email to the issue 21:08:20 CS: I'm wrong, the tree does not own it. 21:08:30 JS and CS: So it fails on IE. 21:09:02 CS: It's challenging to look at some of these test cases in API tools. 21:09:23 JS: David you have enough to go forward? 21:09:25 DB: I do. 21:09:36 zakim, agenda? 21:09:36 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda: 21:09:37 1. Finalize discussion of meeting time. [from clown] 21:09:37 3. ISSUE-441/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Test case for incomplete use of aria-posinset/aria-setsize. [from clown] 21:09:37 4. ISSUE-481/ACTION-1368/ACTION-1369: (David, Cynthia) aria-live removal events should/must happen before object removal. [from clown] 21:09:37 5. ISSUE-612/ACTION-1370: (Joseph) Add text back for implicit aria-level computation via aria-owns hierarchy. [from clown] 21:09:39 6. ISSUE-618/ACTION-1371: (Cynthia) Investigate how IE implements item de-selection in single selection container. [from clown] 21:09:39 7. ISSUE-635/ACTION-1372: (Cynthia) Create test case for rowgroup role. [from clown] 21:09:39 8. 1.1 ISSUES and ACTIONS: (All) Start with ISSUE-540, https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/23 [from clown] 21:09:39 9. be done [from clown] 21:10:18 -David_Bolter 21:10:28 -[Microsoft] 21:11:20 RRSAgent, stop log 21:11:20 I'm logging. I don't understand 'stop log', joanie. Try /msg RRSAgent help 21:12:16 RRSAgent, stop 21:15:25 present: joanie, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Cynthia_Shelly, David_Bolter 21:15:34 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/11-aapi-minutes.html clown