See also: IRC log
http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/open
close ACTION-279
<trackbot> Closed ACTION-279.
richard: working on counter
styles
... and tests for that
... implementing Mati's extended Hebrew submission
... getting close to submitting since counter-styles at css
going to PR
... uploading a bunch of CSS tests to their suite
https://www.w3.org/International/wiki/Review_radar
<scribe> ACTION: addison: ask for a LC due date on DOM4 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-282 - Ask for a lc due date on dom4 [on Addison Phillips - due 2014-02-13].
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/articles/inline-bidi-markup/update
richard: been out for
review
... had some comments
... addressed them
... want to publish this, replacing the existing one
<scribe> chair: all in favor?
<matial> no pb
richard: would like to change the title
"Inline Markup and Bidi: What you need to know"
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/articlelist#direction
"Text Direction and Bidi"
matial: Text Direction -> Bidi ?
<matial> +1
<r12a> +1
<fsasaki> +1
+1
<JcK> yes, publish
<scribe> chair: resolved to publish
<r12a> (note that +1s are for proposal to publish)
<scribe> ACTION: richard: publish WYNTK about bidi update, retitling as appropriate [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-283 - Publish wyntk about bidi update, retitling as appropriate [on Richard Ishida - due 2014-02-13].
<fsasaki> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its-ig/2014Feb/0006.html
felix: how would date-time values
be referenced
... don't want normative reference to a Note
addison: rfc3339 ?
felix: xliff 2.0 also needs a reference
<fsasaki> addison: reference XML schema date / time type as an option
<fsasaki> .. in the thread it is not strictly a time stamp
<fsasaki> .. if it is a complete value (date, time, timezone offset) that is a time stamp
<fsasaki> .. if you want to allow other things that is more complicated, see e.g. floating number discussion
felix: mainly a timestamp, I
think
... but could include things like "should be localized by
such-and-such"
... not sure if that's a timestamp
<fsasaki> addision: could be treated as a time stamp
<fsasaki> .. not necessarily floating
<fsasaki> .. the mail says things like "just having a year etc." - not sure about the purpose
<fsasaki> .. question is whether you have a specific set of date values that you want to permit, or just want to allow definition of some fields with date related information
<fsasaki> [discussion on XML schema data types and whether a reference to that would help]
<fsasaki> addision: xml schema defines all of the lexical spaces
<fsasaki> .. the RFC has a list of productions that you can point to normatively
<fsasaki> .. that does not contain all the complicated stuff you don't care about
<fsasaki> .. it is an RFC, that has been around for a long time
<scribe> ACTION: felix: write back to XLIFF and ITS-IG with summary of our discussion [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-284 - Write back to xliff and its-ig with summary of our discussion [on Felix Sasaki - due 2014-02-13].
richard: we can close all of the comments?
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/track/products/54
addison: there transition
document (see email) noted that we hadn't accept (or not) their
rejection of our comments
... satisfied on 306/307
richard: me too
addison: other one is 329
richard: they argued clearly why
they don't want to change
... worth raising the issue
... key thing is that it's not really a rule
... wrote a set of tests for syntax
... and submitted those too
... never could do @charset with extra spaces
<scribe> chair: should we accept this?
JcK: would prefer if we fixed it, but not sure worth objecting
<fsasaki> +1
<r12a> accept
<matial> no opinion
<scribe> chair: no formal objection
<scribe> ACTION: addison: respond to ISSUE-329 indicating we are satisfied with their decision/have no formal objection [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/02/06-i18n-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-285 - Respond to issue-329 indicating we are satisfied with their decision/have no formal objection [on Addison Phillips - due 2014-02-13].
http://www.doodle.com/diuzsimytq649rvp
needs to be refreshed, since it doesn't show times
richard: recruiting?
<fsasaki> http://www.w3.org/community/bpmlod/
felix: the group is mainly
focusing on creating the best practices
... could contact them about reviews and whether they would
like to join us
richard: good to encourage folks to participate, particularly member orgs