22:49:21 RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y 22:49:21 logging to http://www.w3.org/2014/02/03-html-a11y-irc 22:49:23 RRSAgent, make logs world 22:49:25 Zakim, this will be 2119 22:49:25 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_HTML AT()6:00PM scheduled to start in 11 minutes 22:49:26 Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 22:49:26 Date: 03 February 2014 22:50:24 Meeting: Canvas Accessibility Sub-Group Teleconference 22:51:57 agenda+ Concerns raised by Mozilla 22:51:57 agenda+ When Canvas can go back to LC 22:51:57 agenda+ Next Meeting 22:52:03 zakim, agenda? 22:52:03 I see 8 items remaining on the agenda: 22:52:04 6. Any Remaining A11yTF Bugs? [from janina] 22:52:04 7. Bug Triage: Review of Resolved Bugs tracked by TF [from see below via janina] 22:52:04 8. Other Business [from janina] 22:52:04 9. Identify Scribe for the next TF teleconference http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List [from janina] 22:52:05 10. be done [from janina] 22:52:05 11. Concerns raised by Mozilla [from MarkS] 22:52:05 12. When Canvas can go back to LC [from MarkS] 22:52:05 13. Next Meeting [from MarkS] 22:52:18 zakim, drop items 6,7,8,9,10 22:52:18 I don't understand 'drop items 6,7,8,9,10', MarkS 22:52:27 zakim, clear agenda 22:52:27 agenda cleared 22:52:49 agenda+ Concerns raised by Mozilla 22:52:49 agenda+ When Canvas can go back to LC 22:52:49 agenda+ Next Meeting 22:53:09 scribe: MarkS 22:53:18 chair: MarkS 22:57:26 jaymunro has joined #html-a11y 22:57:53 WAI_HTML AT()6:00PM has now started 22:58:00 +MarkS 22:58:19 richardschwerdtfeger has joined #html-a11y 22:58:38 +Rich_Schwerdtfeger 22:59:46 +[Mozilla] 23:00:04 +[Microsoft] 23:00:10 zakim, microsoft has me 23:00:10 +jaymunro; got it 23:00:20 zakim, [Mozilla] is davidb 23:00:20 +davidb; got it 23:01:03 zakim, take up item 1 23:01:03 agendum 1. "Concerns raised by Mozilla" taken up [from MarkS] 23:01:47 JatinderMann has joined #html-a11y 23:02:08 DB: It appears as though there was a reaction to the discussion at Mozilla. I was surprised that Dominic withdrew his support. 23:02:26 +[Microsoft.a] 23:02:29 ...need to ask him. Want to give Alex and Rik some space to explore hit regions 23:02:48 zakim, [Microsoft is JatinderMann 23:02:48 sorry, MarkS, I do not recognize a party named '[Microsoft' 23:02:56 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=958241 23:03:39 zakim, [Microsoft.a] is JatinderMann 23:03:39 +JatinderMann; got it 23:05:40 DB: worried that the AAPI doesn't have enough info about siblings and children, etc. 23:06:26 Mike5 has joined #html-a11y 23:06:32 RS: I understand that info gets stored in the layout engine, and in the AAPI. If you do average scrolling, the info get updated. The issue we had was if the viewport needed to be scrolled into view, which we handled in our spec changes 23:06:40 Zakim, call Mike 23:06:40 ok, Mike5; the call is being made 23:06:41 +Mike 23:06:54 ...When the discussion was happening, Zynga was not pleased with hit testing approach. They wanted something "fuzzier" 23:07:10 ...they wanted to modify the actually hit or trigger area 23:07:51 ...when hit testing was put into the spec, Microsoft didn't have a chance to review it. It was later taken out. So we focused on the drawSystemFocusRing, now drawFocusIfNeeded approach to handle a11y. 23:08:24 ...in order for hit regions to work, we have to work on Path as well. Most of this is Canvas L2 stuff. 23:08:33 DB: Who is responsible for storing the current path 23:08:34 ? 23:08:42 RS: its the object, the canvas object. 23:09:01 ...I think the drawFocusIfNeeded and Hit Regions need to coexist 23:09:18 DB: It could cause a problem, I don't know. 23:09:45 RS: If we do implement hit regions, we could say that it overrides any drawFocusIfNeeded processing. 23:09:53 DB: right one would need priority 23:11:04 ...we wanted to explore hit testing. if it doesn't work out, we wanted to consider focus outline as a backup 23:11:26 ...if hit testing goes really well, we're not sure what we would do with focus outline approach 23:11:50 JMann: So hit testing might solve the problem we solve with drawFocus? 23:12:06 RS: It would solve the location info, but not the outline drawing 23:12:31 JMann: so we have two potential solutions, but would only need to support one? 23:12:52 RS: IF we had two, could one affect the setting of the other? 23:13:04 DB: I'm looking out for the cognitive load on the developer 23:13:32 JMann: If we support drawFocus, and then hit testing comes around, how does that affect the developer 23:13:45 RS: Hit testing was always in the plan. The question is how long people will have to wait. 23:14:23 JMann: imagine we support drawFocus, hit testing in L2 will have to play nicely with drawFocus 23:15:35 RS: I don't think it would be a problem. We'd be applying hit regions in a similar manner to how its done in the OS. The thing is, if we add hit testing, if someone supplies a hit region, it takes precedence over any other location information 23:16:16 JMann: whatever we build in L2, it has to play well with L1. I just worry about compatibility. Espeicially if our only motivation is to get something out the door. 23:16:33 RS: We will still need to handle drawing the focus, including high contrast. 23:17:26 DB: as far as I'm concerned, neither option is off the table. Trevor didn't accept the patch, but that is not final. We would like to take a week on this to do some exploration. 23:17:42 ...I have reached out to Dominic. Don't want to bother him too much. 23:17:52 RS: Better if it came from Moz. 23:18:48 MS: encourage Moz to post to public-canvas-api 23:18:58 zakim, agenda? 23:18:58 I see 3 items remaining on the agenda: 23:18:59 1. Concerns raised by Mozilla [from MarkS] 23:18:59 2. When Canvas can go back to LC [from MarkS] 23:18:59 3. Next Meeting [from MarkS] 23:21:00 JMunro: looking at hit regions, just wanted to say Path is critical to that. If we are thinking about going down that road, there is a lot of work to do on both 23:22:08 JMann: happy with drawFocus in L1 and hit regions in L2 as long as there is no backwards compatibility issues. 23:23:35 RS: I don't think they are going to draw the actual focus in hit regions 23:23:47 -Mike 23:23:48 -JatinderMann 23:23:48 -MarkS 23:23:50 -Rich_Schwerdtfeger 23:23:51 -[Microsoft] 23:24:00 zakim, close item 1 23:24:00 agendum 1, Concerns raised by Mozilla, closed 23:24:01 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 23:24:01 2. When Canvas can go back to LC [from MarkS] 23:24:07 zakim, take up item 2 23:24:07 agendum 2. "When Canvas can go back to LC" taken up [from MarkS] 23:24:21 MS: I will update Paul this week in the TF call 23:24:30 zakim, close item 2 23:24:30 agendum 2, When Canvas can go back to LC, closed 23:24:31 I see 1 item remaining on the agenda: 23:24:31 3. Next Meeting [from MarkS] 23:24:36 zakim, take up next item 23:24:36 agendum 3. "Next Meeting" taken up [from MarkS] 23:24:42 See you all next week. 23:24:53 zakim, who is on the phone? 23:24:53 On the phone I see davidb 23:24:56 thanks mark 23:25:26 rrsagent, make minutes 23:25:26 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/03-html-a11y-minutes.html MarkS 23:30:43 plh has joined #html-a11y 23:31:34 zakim, drop davidb 23:31:34 davidb is being disconnected 23:31:35 WAI_HTML AT()6:00PM has ended 23:31:35 Attendees were MarkS, Rich_Schwerdtfeger, jaymunro, davidb, [Microsoft], JatinderMann, Mike 23:42:03 rrsagent, make minutes 23:42:03 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2014/02/03-html-a11y-minutes.html MarkS 04:38:48 MarkS: sorry I missed the meeting! 07:39:49 Mike5 has left #html-a11y 09:40:12 MarkS_znc has joined #html-a11y 10:15:15 plh has joined #html-a11y 12:15:34 chaals has joined #html-a11y 13:13:50 chaals has joined #html-a11y 13:52:01 chaals has joined #html-a11y 14:33:08 davidb has joined #html-a11y 14:48:49 chaals1 has joined #html-a11y 15:55:45 Joshue108 has joined #html-a11y 17:12:06 chaals has joined #html-a11y