See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribenick: ericP
-> http://www.w3.org/2013/12/FDA-TA/ strawman
charlie_: FDA said the focus on
the TA work is efficacy points
... obsevations connecting intervention and pathophysioly
... obs: normal, outcomes, endpoints
<kerstin> Charlie talking through http://www.w3.org/2013/12/FDA-TA/TA-MetaModel-cmap.png
charlie_: metamodel is the above model
ericP: bottom-up abuse of the metamodel, coopted for base classes
-> http://www.w3.org/2014/Talks/0107-FDA-TA-egp/#(4)
http://www.w3.org/2014/Talks/0107-FDA-TA-egp/#(2)
http://www.w3.org/2014/Talks/0107-FDA-TA-egp/#(2)
Claude: i think of observations
as quantitative measurements and the thing i do the make the
observations
... unless obs really means the act of observing, and the
result is captured elsewhere, this model is potentally
confusing
... coulld separate the act of observing from the data
observed
charlie_: in early RIM, there was
a separation. now Obs is a kind of Act with a code.
... RIM has substance administration etc.
... FDA cares about processes as measured by some generic idea
of the value of the obs
Claude: i'm working on models for CDS
charlie_: FDA is not trying to feed CDS, instead just looking at the evidence around effectiveness of intervention
Claude: we're looking at a CDS ontology, could we interop with this?
charlie_: we asked that it all be sharable, but note that this will be narrow
ericP: is the distinction useful in CDS?
Claude: HL7's model for CDS is
the Virtual Medical Record
... a CDS rule might look at a set of characteristics about a
patient and fire off a diagnostic procedure
Sajjad: have you written formal dens?
charlie_: FDA knows they have to do it
-> http://www.w3.org/2013/12/FDA-TA/ strawman
ericP: can two people use variations of a ontology and get useful data interop
http://www.w3.org/2014/Talks/0107-FDA-TA-egp/
-> http://www.w3.org/2013/12/FDA-TA/ strawman
charlie: expect ta-specific,
ta-group (e.g. commonalities at organ level or systemic
processes like inflamation), and pan-ta
... we need to show FDA that common semantics across TAs will
be recognizable
Mike: Q: about Obs -[ AtomicObs, OutcomeAssessment ]
-> http://www.w3.org/2013/12/FDA-TA/subject-amy.ttl amy gets better
# Positive outcome
:subjectsKidneyGraftWithNormalFunction a rrej:KidneyGraftOutcomeAssessment ; # a rrej:GraftSurvival ;
mm: hasObservationTime
"2013-10-19T12:34:00Z"^^xsd:dateTime ;
... beforeIntervention :subjectsOutpatientGFR10 ,
:subjectsGFRpreOp ;
... intervention :subjectOnExcipiens , :subjectsTransplant
;
... afterIntervention :subjectsPostOpDay5GFR ;
... hasOutcomeValue rrej:NormalFunctioningGraft .
Claude: re-usable in the clinical practice feedback loop
charlie_: determining efficacy of interventions may well require the granularity that Claude alluded to before.
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: ericP Inferring Scribes: ericP Default Present: ericP, +1.919.767.aaaa, TimWilliams, Mike_Denny, Kerstin_Forsberg, charlie, Sajjad, claude Present: ericP +1.919.767.aaaa TimWilliams Mike_Denny Kerstin_Forsberg charlie Sajjad claude WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 14 Jan 2014 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2014/01/14-hcls-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]