IRC log of webevents on 2013-11-05
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:59:32 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #webevents
- 15:59:32 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2013/11/05-webevents-irc
- 15:59:43 [ArtB]
- Scribe: Art
- 15:59:44 [ArtB]
- ScribeNick: ArtB
- 15:59:44 [ArtB]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013OctDec/0056.html
- 15:59:44 [ArtB]
- Chair: Art
- 15:59:44 [ArtB]
- Meeting: Web Events WG Voice Conference
- 15:59:50 [plh]
- plh has joined #webevents
- 16:00:08 [plh]
- zakim, list conferences
- 16:00:08 [Zakim]
- I see HTML_WG()11:00AM, RWC_PEWG()11:00AM, WAI_WCAG()11:00AM active
- 16:00:09 [Zakim]
- also scheduled at this time are VB_VBWG()10:00AM, XML_ET-TF()11:00AM, RWC_WebEven()11:00AM, SEC_(PUSHAPIPAG)11:00AM, SW_HCLS()11:00AM, WAI_(WCAG2ICT)10:00AM, Team_Validat()11:00AM,
- 16:00:09 [Zakim]
- ... T&S_XMLSEC()10:00AM, WAI_UAWG(CHAIRS)10:30AM
- 16:00:19 [plh]
- zakim, this is WebEven
- 16:00:19 [Zakim]
- plh, I see RWC_WebEven()11:00AM in the schedule but not yet started. Perhaps you mean "this will be WebEven".
- 16:00:26 [plh]
- zakim, this will be WebEven
- 16:00:26 [Zakim]
- ok, plh; I see RWC_WebEven()11:00AM scheduled to start now
- 16:00:31 [Zakim]
- RWC_WebEven()11:00AM has now started
- 16:00:32 [Zakim]
- +Plh
- 16:00:39 [Zakim]
- +Doug_Schepers
- 16:00:44 [Zakim]
- +Cathy
- 16:01:13 [Zakim]
- +Art_Barstow
- 16:01:28 [rbyers]
- On my way
- 16:02:11 [sangwhan]
- on my way
- 16:02:13 [ArtB]
- Present: Art_Barstow, Doug_Schepers, Cathy_Chan, Philippe_LeHegaret
- 16:02:25 [Zakim]
- +??P11
- 16:02:38 [rbyers]
- Zakim, P11 is Rick_Byers
- 16:02:38 [Zakim]
- sorry, rbyers, I do not recognize a party named 'P11'
- 16:02:38 [ArtB]
- Present+ Rick_Byers
- 16:02:44 [rbyers]
- Zakim, ??P11 is Rick_Byers
- 16:02:44 [Zakim]
- +Rick_Byers; got it
- 16:03:24 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:03:34 [sangwhan]
- Zakim, IPcaller is me
- 16:03:34 [Zakim]
- +sangwhan; got it
- 16:03:38 [ArtB]
- Present+ Sangwhan_Moon
- 16:04:00 [ArtB]
- Topic: Web Events WG is done - Pop the Champagne!
- 16:04:06 [ArtB]
- AB: I just wanted to thank everyone for their contributions
- 16:04:12 [ArtB]
- ... this group has been a real pleasure to work with.
- 16:04:25 [ArtB]
- AB: the Touch Events CG is up and running
- 16:04:32 [ArtB]
- … and please join us there
- 16:05:24 [ArtB]
- Topic: Q&A
- 16:05:47 [ArtB]
- RB: thanks Art and the others that contributed to this spec
- 16:05:56 [ArtB]
- … I think this was real important effort
- 16:06:01 [ArtB]
- … sorry we were a bit late to join
- 16:06:24 [ArtB]
- AB: thanks for your contributions Rick and for your work in PEWG
- 16:06:28 [ArtB]
- PLH: thanks all
- 16:06:38 [ArtB]
- … what about errata for Touch Events spec?
- 16:06:43 [ArtB]
- … who would fix that?
- 16:06:51 [ArtB]
- AB: good question
- 16:06:56 [ArtB]
- … what is the precedence?
- 16:07:06 [ArtB]
- PLH: I think CG could take care of erratta
- 16:07:19 [ArtB]
- … and if there becomes a lot, then we can figure out something else
- 16:07:24 [ArtB]
- AB: that plan makes sense to me
- 16:07:39 [ArtB]
- PLH: recommend the ED be maintained
- 16:07:49 [ArtB]
- … the CG can do that
- 16:08:04 [ArtB]
- AB: I like that plan
- 16:08:16 [ArtB]
- DS: yes, that's what I expected
- 16:08:31 [ArtB]
- … should be easy to transfer stuff from CG
- 16:09:10 [ArtB]
- … the CG will define how browsers should handle simulatenous events
- 16:09:21 [ArtB]
- … but we aren't there yet
- 16:09:33 [ArtB]
- DS: thanks everyone
- 16:09:37 [sangwhan]
- s/simulatenous/simultaneous/
- 16:09:48 [ArtB]
- … despite being a bit prolonged, this group was really efficient
- 16:10:06 [ArtB]
- … PAG was distracting but we went through it fairly quickly
- 16:10:15 [ArtB]
- … our PAG is now a template for other PAGS
- 16:10:21 [ArtB]
- … so we did a good job
- 16:10:31 [ArtB]
- … that is a good accomplishment
- 16:10:44 [ArtB]
- … We had a clear mission, the group grew
- 16:11:00 [ArtB]
- … it helped bring out Pointer Events
- 16:11:11 [ArtB]
- … this has been a good model
- 16:11:21 [ArtB]
- … lots of great cooperation
- 16:11:27 [ArtB]
- … so thanks everyone
- 16:11:55 [ArtB]
- and congrats, even though the overall duration was long, the work was concentrated
- 16:12:41 [ArtB]
- AB: I expect a formal annoucement the group closes today or soon
- 16:12:53 [Zakim]
- -Art_Barstow
- 16:12:58 [ArtB]
- AB: meeting adjourned
- 16:13:00 [Zakim]
- -Plh
- 16:13:03 [Zakim]
- -Cathy
- 16:13:04 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 16:13:04 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2013/11/05-webevents-minutes.html ArtB
- 16:13:06 [Zakim]
- -sangwhan
- 16:13:08 [Zakim]
- -Rick_Byers
- 16:13:17 [Zakim]
- -Doug_Schepers
- 16:13:18 [Zakim]
- RWC_WebEven()11:00AM has ended
- 16:13:18 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Plh, Doug_Schepers, Cathy, Art_Barstow, Rick_Byers, sangwhan
- 16:14:03 [shepazu]
- oh, and thanks to everyone who drove teh test forward, specifically!
- 16:14:04 [shepazu]
- s/teh test/the tests/
- 16:14:18 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make log Public
- 16:16:16 [plh]
- plh has left #webevents
- 16:31:38 [shepazu]
- ArtB, are we keeping this IRC channel around for the CG, or should I remove it from my list? We could use the #pointerevents IRC channel
- 16:53:44 [ArtB]
- good question shepazu
- 16:53:53 [ArtB]
- it would be nice for the CG to have a channel
- 16:54:49 [ArtB]
- consolidating #webevents and #pointerevents would be a good idea
- 16:55:26 [ArtB]
- I noticed, f.ex., that mbrubeck does not join this channel but he does #pointerevents
- 16:57:28 [shepazu]
- ArtB, let's put that on the wiki as our Touch Events CG IRC channel, shall we?
- 16:57:39 [ArtB]
- which one?
- 16:57:49 [ArtB]
- #pointerevents?
- 16:57:51 [shepazu]
- #pointerevents
- 16:58:05 [ArtB]
- yeah, let's roll with that ;)
- 16:58:09 [shepazu]
- and I'll abandone this channel!
- 16:58:17 [ArtB]
- zakim, bye
- 16:58:17 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #webevents
- 16:58:20 [ArtB]
- rrsagent, bye
- 16:58:20 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items