See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 05 November 2013
<scribe> scribenick: clown
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/10
JS: The document is going to go last call very soon.
MC: It was supposed to be today, but it might not be until tomorrow but with today's date.
JS: there are two issues and one
action in the list for the UAIG.
... The two issues are Michael's and they will happen when they
happen.
MC Right, there not important for this meeting.
CS: The issue-616 is closed. Close the action?
action-1284?
<trackbot> action-1284 -- Cynthia Shelly to Start the conversation re keeping issue-616 feature in the spec on list, realizing it may go lc at risk. we need to determine what to do by next tuesday. -- due 2013-10-29 -- CLOSED
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/actions/1284
JS: The discussion will pick up
again in the 1.1 time frame.
... So, move the action to 1.1?
CS: So, I just moved it to 1.1
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=Platform%20APIs&list_id=3116&product=ARIA
JS: there are two open
bugs.
... first on is :https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22131
... I think this is a best practices issue.
MC: This bugzilla has component "UAIG".
DB: Do we have other components for the ARIA product.
MC: There is also the issue of
whether to use bugzillla going foward, or how to best use
it.
... What component to use?
DB: Either "general" or "best practices".
MC: Let's set up "General".
JS: any way to move this bug to the new "General" component?
MC: Yes, just edit the bug, and
reset the component.
... <notices an email to google> I should change that old
email address.
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7044
CS: That is listed a version 1.0
DB: That should be changed to 2.0
<davidb> [discussion about bug history]
CS: I looked at it back in 2009, but thought we didn't have time then.
DB: We could let it lie, or move it to an issue.
JS: Is it more likely to be picked up if an ARIA 2.0 issue or ARIA 1.1?
CS: I think it should be an
issue, and 1.1. timeframe is reasonable.
... I can make an issue for this.
DB: Let's put a link to the bugzilla in the issue.
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-implementation/#mapping_state-property
list item number 5.
<cyns> Bug 7044 moved to issue 628 https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/628
https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/products/17
issue-398?
<trackbot> issue-398 -- Errata: aria-setsize and aria-posinset should apply to more than just listitem and option -- open
<trackbot> https://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/Group/track/issues/398
JS: instead of posinet and setsize for grids, Chrome suggested aria-colindex and aria-rowindex.
CS: Seems like a good idea.
<davidb> agreed
CS: Next week is TPAC. Should we
have this call next week?
... I will be at TPAC.
JS: I will discuss it with you later, David.
<davidb> DB: awesome
s/MC\: Right/MC: Right/
s/MC Right/MC\: Right/g
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/EIther/Either/ FAILED: s/MC Right/MC: Right/ Succeeded: s/MC Right/MC\: Right/ FAILED: s/MC Right/MC\: Right/g Found ScribeNick: clown Inferring Scribes: clown Default Present: Bryan_Garaventa, Joseph_Scheuhammer, Michael_Cooper, David_Bolter, Cynthia_Shelly Present: Bryan_Garaventa Joseph_Scheuhammer Michael_Cooper David_Bolter Cynthia_Shelly Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2013Nov/0000.html Found Date: 05 Nov 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/11/05-aapi-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]