See also: IRC log
http://www.w3.org/2013/03/push-pag-charter.html
Yves: the spec is quite small,
the PAG slows it down
... it's also of interest to sysapps, check with dsr
efullea: Which version of the
spec will be analyzed?
... latest ED has substantial changes over PWD
<Zakim> shepazu, you wanted to address that qestion
<Yves> +1 on pushing a new version asap
shepazu: we're trying to produce a RF spec, so it's most relevant for us to review the latest draft
efullea: will work with co-editor and chairs to publish a next WD
<shepazu> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/push/raw-file/tip/index.html
dbaron: the current ED is
essentially a different approach from the current WD
... an option would be to publish as a new spec, on which there
might be different disclosures
<efullea> there are substantial changes with regards to the TR draft but it is definitely not a new spec
chaals: that would be unusual
<Zakim> chaals, you wanted to reply to dbaron
<chaals> [For the record: Nokia really doesn't have anyone at work in July who has the basic knowledge to participate in a simple group like this?]
efullea: ask Nokia whether they believe their exclusions to apply to latest draft
wseltzer: Should we operate in member-only mode?
Shall we operate in member-only mode?
<chaals> [couldn't care less]
Postpone the decision, continue operating in public for now.
wseltzer: Seeking volunteers for ongoing work
efullea: volunteers
dka: made a request to GSMA for legal assistance
<chaals> [I will do some work too]
shepazu: suggests that mailing list be our primary mode of interaction, with teleconfs scheduled only as necessary
<Zakim> dka, you wanted to comment on call schedule
dka: TAG has made calls into status updates; short but frequent
shepazu: methods: everyone reads
the spec, everyone reads the patents and extracts the
independent claims
... group assesses match or not of essential claims of spec to
independent claims' elements
<dka> +1 to shepazu's comments.
shepazu: we should look for the
work necessary to produce an RF spec, not unnecessary invalidty
analysis
... I'll take the action to start a page on patent claims
analysis