See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 09 May 2013
* I can scribe - let me pull up the agenda
<scribe> scribe: krisk
ACTION-226: Make sure that the organizational structure of github
<trackbot> Notes added to ACTION-226 Make sure that the organizational structure of github test suite is well documented.
<rubys> ACTION-226?
<trackbot> ACTION-226 -- Kris Krueger to make sure that the organizational structure of github test suite is well documented -- due 2013-04-30 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/226
I have not made any progress but will have the wiki updated by next week
<rubys> ACTION-226 due next week
<trackbot> Set ACTION-226 Make sure that the organizational structure of github test suite is well documented due date to next week.
rubys: none
... let's talk about the f2f web performance at the enfo (other
business)
rubys: none
rubys: actually this should be 'closing' this week
CfC: remove Microdata from HTML 5.0, incorporate Microdata into 5.1
<rubys> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013May/0000.html
tantek: can we discuss the microdata moves to 5.1?
rubys: yes
... we are moving all of microdata from the htm5.0 spec and
into 5.1
tantek: I'd like to promote the
use of extension specs
... Maybe this could be done with microdata?
rubys: if the whatwg makes this a
seperate spec then this could be done, though if not we would
need a editor to signup to do this work
... right now we are just focused on 5.0 and don't want to make
a rash move to remove it completely
tantek: Having this in 5.1 seems to go against our modulatity principals
rubys: tantek can you send a mail to the list to make sure the group has consensus?
tantek: sure
rubys: I don't think you are
missing anything other then the ask for a editor to sign up for
the work.
... please bring this up on the list and we can discuss what we
want to do beyond removing from HTML5.0
... any other comments other than bring this up on the
list?
<glenn> :)
<tantek> Thanks Sam and Daniel for the discussion
<rubys> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013May/0030.html
<rubys> http://www.w3.org/QA/2013/05/perspectives_on_encrypted_medi.html
rubys: one decision has occured to allow EME to proceed as a First Public Working draft
glenn: If a formal objection occurs, will this reverse the FPWD?
plh: The process doesn't require the Director to address Formal Objections prior to the move out of Last Call, there has been instances where the Director did however, such as microdata for example
glenn: I am happy to see things move forward
SUBTOPIC: Testing Task Force
krisk: I don't have much to
report here - I was not able to make the meeting this
week
... Though I should have more to report next time
SUBTOPIC: Accessibility Task Force
Group has continued to meet
The group has focused on what areas of the spec need testing
<janina> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=21985
We are working on getting bugs that impact 5.0 taken care of..
We are working on the extension specs such and have these ready in June
The group is working on creating proposal for 'transcript' - ISSUE 194
rubys: any other questions or comments for Janina?
SUBTOPIC: Media Task Force
rubys: anyone here to provide status?
Proposal: stop work on "HTML: The Markup Language" and "HTML5:
<rubys> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2013May/0016.html
rubys: please take a look at the list, no specific date
daniel: It would be good to have this for authors
rubys: The belief is that this is being addressed in another better mechanism vs the xlst/xml transforms
daniel: This seems like a key
deliverable for authors and I'd like to see this not be
dropped
... I'll look on the list for more information
rubys: please do
janina: It seems it's more about how we do this rather than not doing this work
rubys: correct
daniel: I'll catch up on this via the list
SUBTOPIC: Web Performance and Error Handling from F2F
The WP WG is looking to have a futrue proof errors beyond networking (DNS, TCPIP, etc) such that it covers css, html, javascript errors
The upshot is that the WP WG should be able to accomidate this for these newer classes
daniel has an action item to go look for specific examples where this could be used in the HTML spec
rubys: and other business to
discuss?
... Scribe for next meeting?
... Adjournment
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.138 of Date: 2013-04-25 13:59:11 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/format/formal/ Succeeded: s/The process would (object) doesn't apply until last call/The process doesn't require the Director to address Formal Objections prior to the move out of Last Call/ Succeeded: s/in this instance the Director actually looked earlier in the process/there has been instances where the Director did however, such as microdata for example/ Found Scribe: krisk Inferring ScribeNick: krisk Default Present: +1.626.379.aaaa, Sam, +1.206.850.aabb, janina, krisk, +1.818.406.aacc, jaymunro, +1.425.214.aadd, Bin_Hu, MarkS, hober, Plh, glenn, tantek Present: +1.626.379.aaaa Sam +1.206.850.aabb janina krisk +1.818.406.aacc jaymunro +1.425.214.aadd Bin_Hu MarkS hober Plh glenn tantek Found Date: 09 May 2013 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2013/05/09-html-wg-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]