See also: IRC log
Giuseppe reported that several groups are considering the poll.
<kaz> action-110?
<trackbot> ACTION-110 -- Sheau Ng to update the IG wiki with his use cases -- due 2013-04-24 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/actions/110
Clarke: Testing meeting on Friday. They clarified questions. Clear plan on testing & tools. Defined financing levels.
Mark: The testing group identified the need of funding and created a proposed donation plan. They're looking for donations.
<Clarke> Use case Sheau 1: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/Testing/Web_%26_TV_Testing_Discussions/Browser_Synchronization
roger: Can review sheau's use cases
clarke: First use case is browser
synchronization. Complex use case. Two or more sources of
content - e.g. language track on phone and main stream on
TV.
... possibly different CDMs on different browsers & need
synch.
Bin: I think the use case makes sense.
clarke: [reading use case]
... 1. Any questions? 2. Do we feel it's valid & would add
test requirements to our platform?
... My opinion is it does add test requirements. No others add
browser synchronization.
bin: Agree. Testing synchronization will be valuable.
clarke: It also adds
functionality to test tool by testing two browsers.
... propose we move to valid test case & include in
requirements doc. Any opposed? OK.
... Next use case: Browser switching
... [reading use case]
... Would support watching video on tablet & transferring
to TV, when tablet & TVs have different CDMs
... [reading use case]
<kaz> Use Case 2
clarke: I think this is relating to the previous one, except instead of running simultaneously, it's sequential.
bin: I think use case makes sense.
mark_vickers: Good use case, but transferring streams isn't supported by web platform yet.
bin: transferring streams could be an application feature, but not a platform feature.
mark_vickers: agree
clarke: So, the HTML5 feature of this and previous use case is the same.
mark_vickers: so maybe these should be rolled into one.
kaz: This could be a good use
case for multimodal group.
... prehaps multimodal part of the use case needs additional
testing
<scribe> ACTION: Rajan to check with Sheau on whether the two use cases are testing the same HTML5 features. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/04/24-webtv-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-111 - Check with Sheau on whether the two use cases are testing the same HTML5 features. [on Rajan Mehta - due 2013-05-01].
clarke: no other business
<scribe> ACTION: Clarke to update the requirements doc with new requirements and place in repository. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/04/24-webtv-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-112 - Update the requirements doc with new requirements and place in repository. [on Clarke Stevens - due 2013-05-01].
clarke: question for group is when we have enough feedback from external groups?
mark_vickers: Suggest we create a document to hold results in members-only area.
kaz: should it be in wiki or HTML format?
clarke: wiki format easier
<scribe> ACTION: kaz to create members-only wiki area. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2013/04/24-webtv-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-113 - Create members-only wiki area. [on Kazuyuki Ashimura - due 2013-05-01].
clarke: closes meeting
<kaz> [ adjourned ]
<Clarke> Thanks, Mark