IRC log of htmlt on 2012-05-08
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:02:16 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #htmlt
- 15:02:16 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/05/08-htmlt-irc
- 15:03:42 [krisk]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2012May/0008.html
- 15:04:22 [krisk]
- Let's start with agenda item #3 Spring Cleaning
- 15:05:00 [krisk]
- Since this has alot of discussion...
- 15:05:57 [krisk]
- I agree that with jgraham's last comment about the whole point is to not have tests running on w3.org for security reasons.
- 15:06:27 [jgraham]
- I think Aryeh's request is reasonable
- 15:06:43 [jgraham]
- To run hgweb on w3c-test.org
- 15:07:16 [jgraham]
- I guess we need to ask plh/systeam
- 15:07:20 [krisk]
- I am open to this as well...
- 15:08:02 [krisk]
- Yes it shoud be a system/w3c team ask to get this in place
- 15:08:22 [krisk]
- So that one can just expect /resources/ to work
- 15:08:43 [krisk]
- Then everyone can really use this as the way to include testharness.js,etc...
- 15:09:29 [krisk]
- Though this doesn't seem to block fixing tests in the HTML test suite
- 15:10:14 [krisk]
- Let me take a quick peek at webapps and see what we have...
- 15:11:01 [krisk]
- Since I was under the impression that Aryeh's issue was limited to his editing and dom4 work
- 15:11:52 [jgraham]
- Yes, I'm not sure exactly what his usecase is but he seems to particularly want to link to specific revisions of the editing testsuite
- 15:15:48 [krisk]
- OK taking a peek at tests that have been submitted in webapps, I only see one for shadowdom that has an odd path to testharness.js
- 15:16:36 [krisk]
- Some websocket tests do point to w3c-test.org, but they don't have the same constraint as the editing/selection tests that Aryeh has mentioned.
- 15:17:01 [krisk]
- So it seems fine to update the tests in webapps and html to use /resources/
- 15:18:36 [krisk]
- Do you agree james?
- 15:19:07 [jgraham]
- Yes
- 15:19:26 [jgraham]
- Are you also going to fix the relative order of testharness and testharnessreport.js?
- 15:20:45 [krisk]
- I should be able to do that as well...
- 15:21:22 [krisk]
- It should be easy though if I hit an issue I'll just update the path
- 15:21:50 [krisk]
- sound good?
- 15:22:01 [jgraham]
- Yup
- 15:23:57 [krisk]
- Agenda Item #2 New Test Submissions
- 15:24:43 [krisk]
- http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/shortlog shows one new test for an Opera 'feature' by Ms2Ger
- 15:24:54 [krisk]
- http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rev/1c74dd6990e9
- 15:25:50 [krisk]
- http://www.w3c-test.org/html/tests/submission/Ms2ger/the-elements-of-html/scripting/the-script-element/script-onload-string.html
- 15:27:18 [krisk]
- James do you understand his comment about a Opera 'feature'?
- 15:29:18 [jgraham]
- Yup
- 15:29:37 [jgraham]
- It is a test that Opera fails because we implement some behavior that isn't in the spec
- 15:29:46 [jgraham]
- I will check and see if we have a bug on fixing it
- 15:29:54 [gsnedders]
- (Isn't that theoretically a permissable extension, therefore?)
- 15:31:13 [jgraham]
- No
- 15:31:22 [jgraham]
- The HTML spec doesn't work like the ES spec
- 15:31:51 [jgraham]
- It could be a permissable extension if we wrote a spec for it and got people to agree to implement that spec rather than HTML5
- 15:31:58 [jgraham]
- (on this point)
- 15:32:10 [jgraham]
- But we're not going to :)
- 15:33:39 [krisk]
- Next Agenda Item: Bugs on Approved Tests
- 15:34:07 [krisk]
- tinyurl -> http://tinyurl.com/6mvghxx
- 15:34:46 [krisk]
- We have no new bugs
- 15:36:07 [krisk]
- Shall we adjourn or does anyone have any other items they would like to discuss?
- 15:37:03 [jgraham]
- I don't have anything in particular I don't think
- 15:38:07 [krisk]
- Ok let's adjourn
- 15:38:44 [krisk]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 15:38:50 [krisk]
- rrsagent, generate minutes
- 15:38:50 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/05/08-htmlt-minutes.html krisk