ISSUE-60: Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?

Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party?

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Compliance Next

Raised by:

Opened on:

2011-09-22

Description:

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. reminder: issue cleanup and closing issues (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-28)
2. Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
3. issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
4. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-07)
5. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-03-07)
6. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-06)
7. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-03-03)
8. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-03-01)
9. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-03-01)
10. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-03-01)
11. RE: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-03-01)
12. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from singer@apple.com on 2013-03-01)
13. RE: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-03-01)
14. Re: RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-28)
15. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2013-02-28)
16. RE: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
17. Re: RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
18. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
19. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-02-27)
20. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
21. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-02-27)
22. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
23. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
24. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
25. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2013-02-27)
26. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
27. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
28. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
29. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from heatherwest@google.com on 2013-02-27)
30. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
31. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
32. Re: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-02-27)
33. RE: ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from a.hanff@think-privacy.com on 2013-02-27)
34. ISSUE-10 First party definition, ISSUE-60, ACTION-? (from justin@cdt.org on 2013-02-27)
35. Re: Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2013-01-23)
36. Please reopen ISSUE-10 (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-01-22)
37. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from robsherman@fb.com on 2012-11-14)
38. Re: Agenda for 14 November 2012 call (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-14)
39. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-11-13)
40. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-12)
41. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2012-11-12)
42. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2012-11-12)
43. Re: issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-12)
44. RE: issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2012-11-12)
45. issue-60 (first and third party) -- Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from tlr@w3.org on 2012-11-12)
46. Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-12)
47. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from robsherman@fb.com on 2012-11-12)
48. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-10)
49. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-10)
50. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from david@networkadvertising.org on 2012-11-09)
51. RE: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2012-11-09)
52. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from ifette@google.com on 2012-11-09)
53. Re: Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from vigoel@adobe.com on 2012-11-09)
54. Proposals for Compliance issue clean up (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-11-09)
55. RE: Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-09-23)
56. Proposed agenda for Amsterdam F2F on October 03-05, 2012 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2012-09-21)
57. requirements on consistency of '1' response with actual use (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2012-08-23)
58. Agenda for 22 August 2012 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-08-21)
59. RE: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-04-11)
60. Re: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-04-11)
61. RE: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2012-04-11)
62. Re: ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from heatherwest@google.com on 2012-04-11)
63. ISSUE-60: proposed to close (from peter.eckersley@gmail.com on 2012-04-11)
64. Issue-5 - Cross Tracking Definition Proposal (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2012-02-06)
65. Agenda for 2012-1-3 call (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2012-01-03)
66. Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from CPedigo@online-publishers.org on 2011-12-10)
67. Re: [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from jeff@democraticmedia.org on 2011-12-10)
68. [ISSUE-5] What is the definition of tracking? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-12-09)
69. TPE removing first vs third-party issues (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2011-10-31)
70. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from tom@mozilla.com on 2011-10-27)
71. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
72. Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from karld@opera.com on 2011-10-21)
73. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from singer@apple.com on 2011-10-18)
74. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from jennifer.karan@doubleverify.com on 2011-10-16)
75. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from ktrilli@truste.com on 2011-10-16)
76. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2011-10-16)
77. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
78. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15)
79. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
80. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-15)
81. RE: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-15)
82. Re: [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-15)
83. [ISSUE-60] Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from kevsmith@adobe.com on 2011-10-14)
84. Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-14)
85. Re: Call for Experts: How can a site determine whether it is 1st or 3rd party? [ISSUE-60] (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-13)
86. RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-09)
87. Re: first parties (from tien@eff.org on 2011-10-09)
88. Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-09)
89. RE: first parties (from brett@adobe.com on 2011-10-07)
90. Re: first parties (from mts@zurich.ibm.com on 2011-10-07)
91. RE: first parties (from mike@iab.net on 2011-10-07)
92. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
93. Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-07)
94. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-07)
95. Re: first parties (from justin@cdt.org on 2011-10-06)
96. RE: first parties (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2011-10-06)
97. RE: first parties (from acolando@microsoft.com on 2011-10-06)
98. first parties (from aleecia@aleecia.com on 2011-10-06)
99. ISSUE-60: Will a recipient know if it itself is a 1st or 3rd party? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-22)

Related notes:

Display change log