ISSUE-2: What existing proposal, if any, should be the starting point/default for the JSON design?

JSON Starting Point

State:

CLOSED

Product:

RDF JSON

Raised by:

Opened on:

2011-02-23

Description:

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

Re: JSON Emergency Brake (from ivan@w3.org on 2011-08-23)
Re: JSON Emergency Brake (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2011-08-23)
Re: JSON Emergency Brake (from richard@cyganiak.de on 2011-08-23)
Re: JSON Emergency Brake (from michael.hausenblas@deri.org on 2011-08-23)
JSON Emergency Brake (from tomac@google.com on 2011-08-23)
Re: RDF JSON Document Status (from tomac@google.com on 2011-08-16)
Re: RDF JSON Document Status (from guus.schreiber@vu.nl on 2011-08-16)
Re: RDF JSON Document Status (from ian.davis@talis.com on 2011-08-16)
RDF JSON Document Status (from david@3roundstones.com on 2011-08-10)
Re: ISSUE-2: Identifying a document (from sandro@w3.org on 2011-02-23)
ISSUE-2: Identifying a document (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-02-23)

RESOLVED: (1) Incubate on something like JSON-LD, (2) make a REC on something like Talis RDF/JSON, and (3) make a Note on current practice stuff like Linked Data API, at FTF1:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-04-13#resolution_4

David Wood, 10 Aug 2011, 13:49:03

RESOLVED:to remove the words "make a REC on something like Talis RDF/JSON" from this resolution to allow JSON-LD to further incubate.

David Wood, 31 Aug 2011, 15:36:40