<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 14879] You should remove named numeric constants from interfaces that don't have legacy constraints yet. These probably include some or all of: HTMLTrackElement, TextTrack, NavigatorUserMediaError, MediaStream, PeerConnection, EventSource. <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0468.html> 4** [Bug 14526] WF2: When adding filenames to the data set, should there be normalization of decomposed forms? <11http://lis
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 14104] <track> Live captioning <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0470.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0471.html> 4** [Bug 15056] Three suggestions to HTML5 <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0472.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 15108] New: getContext "return a new object for contextId" should handle the called algorithm throwing an exception, so TypeError can be thrown if converting "any..." arguments to a particular IDL type fails. <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0473.html>
<pimpbot> planet: Chris Heilmann: Screencast: 3D CSS rollovers and 3D CSS tester <11http://hacks.mozilla.org/2011/12/screencast-3d-css-rollovers-and-3d-css-tester/>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0474.html>
<pimpbot> planet: Jesper Kristensen: Firefox/Gecko Delivery Meeting Minutes: 2011-12-07 <11http://blog.mozilla.com/meeting-notes/archives/725>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0476.html> 4** [Bug 15109] New: asd fdsdadsa badfa <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0475.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 14911] provide a way to make UAs' ":visited" pseudo-state's behavior more consistent <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0477.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 13614] Define <th abbr=""> as a way to provide a name for a row/column that is used when describing cells for which that cell is a header <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0481.html> 4** [Bug 14937] Replace poor coding example for figure with multiple images <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0480.html> 4** [Bug 13614] Define <th abbr=""> as a way to provide a name for
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 14937] Replace poor coding example for figure with multiple images <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0482.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0483.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 15100] Right-aligning a numeric table column is much more work than it should be <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0484.html> 4** [Bug 15100] Right-aligning a numeric table column is much more work than it should be <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0485.html> 4** [Bug 15095] Allow data: URL for new Worker(). Supported by Opera and Firefox. <11http://lists.w3.org/Arch
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 15110] New: Non Gregorian Calendars needs to be supported in the date/datetime input <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0489.html> 4** [Bug 14750] Clarify what the origin of the new document is if the document is blown away (consider if the old document set document.domain) <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0487.html> 4** [Bug 15063] each MessageChannel acts as its own
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0493.html> 4** [Bug 14937] Replace poor coding example for figure with multiple images <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0492.html> 4** [Bug 14937] Replace poor coding example for figure with multiple images <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-b
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0495.html> 4** [Bug 10830] i18n comment : Please add support for rb <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0494.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 12417] HTML5 is missing attribute for specifying translatability of content <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0496.html>
<pimpbot> planet: Steve Faulkner: HTML5 canvas accessibility discussions 2009-2011 <11http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2011/12/html5-canvas-accessibility-discussions-2009-2011/>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 15112] New: Videos from Mindlocator1 Youtube channel <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0499.html> 4** [Bug 15081] Hi I was wondering if / when some sort of implementation of a "capture" tag would be introduced. Removing the need to add extra third party code or writing your own "capture" system. Surely this would be a good addition to the spec, it would mean less spa <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/
<pimpbot> planet: Bruce: Notes on Adaptive Images (yet again!) <11http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2011/notes-on-adaptive-images-yet-again/>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 10829] i18n comment : ruby code samples <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0500.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 15113] New: "Document" could have a pointer to the "Documents in the DOM" section (the partial Document interface) so that it's possible to find what was previously the HTMLDocument interface by following xrefs <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0501.html>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 15113] "Document" could have a pointer to the "Documents in the DOM" section (the partial Document interface) so that it's possible to find what was previously the HTMLDocument interface by following xrefs <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0502.html> 4** [Bug 15113] "Document" could have a pointer to the "Documents in the DOM" section (the partial Document interface) so that it's possible to find what was p
<pimpbot> planet: Robert Nyman: Mozilla Hacks Weekly, December 8th 2011 <11http://hacks.mozilla.org/2011/12/mozilla-hacks-weekly-december-8th-2011/>
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 15114] New: A "date-optional-state" should be available, for when the specifity of the date is unknown. This would give the user the option of selecting a year, month, or day. Any additional requirements (e.g. required month) can be taken care of with [pattern]. Woul <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0504.html> 4** [Bug 15114] Proposed "date-optional-state" for <input> <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Publi
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 15110] Non Gregorian Calendars needs to be supported in the date/datetime input <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0507.html> 4** [Bug 15100] Right-aligning a numeric table column is much more work than it should be <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0506.html> 4** [Bug 15100] Right-aligning a numeric table column is much more work than it should be <11http://lists.w3.o
<paulc> Good morning.
<Julian> hi there
<pimpbot> Title: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-12-08: actions, issues and task force reports from Paul Cotton on 2011-12-07 (public-html-wg-announce@w3.org from October to December 2011) (at lists.w3.org)
trackbot, start telcon
<trackbot> Date: 08 December 2011
<scribe> ScribeNick: adrianba
<scribe> Scribe: Adrian Bateman
<scribe> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2011OctDec/0019.html
<pimpbot> Title: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-12-08: actions, issues and task force reports from Paul Cotton on 2011-12-07 (public-html-wg-announce@w3.org from October to December 2011) (at lists.w3.org)
<MFOLADARE> 732238 is MFOLADARE from, AT&T
<eliot> new intern?
ACTION-207?
<trackbot> ACTION-207 -- Paul Cotton to confirm that change proposal for av_param is still active -- due 2011-12-08 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/207
<pimpbot> Title: ACTION-207: Confirm that change proposal for av_param is still active - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
paulc: this is related to ISSUE-179
ISSUE-179?
<trackbot> ISSUE-179 -- {audio,video} require param child (or equivalent) -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/179
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-179: {audio,video} require param child (or equivalent) - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
paulc: I don't have anything more to report on this
ACTION-207 due dec 22
<trackbot> ACTION-207 Confirm that change proposal for av_param is still active due date now dec 22
paulc: we'll check to see the status of that action at that time
ISSUE-186?
<trackbot> ISSUE-186 -- conformance error for use of role=presentation on interactive elements -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/186
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-186: conformance error for use of role=presentation on interactive elements - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
paulc: first four items have calls for change proposals later on the agenda
ISSUE-187?
<trackbot> ISSUE-187 -- Document conformance has to be stable over the time -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/187
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-187: Document conformance has to be stable over the time - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
ISSUE-188?
<trackbot> ISSUE-188 -- Text tracks in HTML should be defined in a way agnostic of the specific caption format -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/188
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-188: Text tracks in HTML should be defined in a way agnostic of the specific caption format - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
ISSUE-189?
<trackbot> ISSUE-189 -- Prefix convention needs to be coordinated with IETF -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/189
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-189: Prefix convention needs to be coordinated with IETF - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
ISSUE-190?
<trackbot> ISSUE-190 -- Replace poor coding example for figure with multiple images -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/190
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-190: Replace poor coding example for figure with multiple images - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
paulc: fifth issue was opened in
the last 24 hours
... we also have one outstanding TrackerRequest for bug
13057
<pimpbot> 11http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13057 daniel.glazman, P2, RESOLVED WONTFIX, 13Remove INS and DEL elements in favor of a new set of attributes
bug 13057?
ISSUE-179?
<trackbot> ISSUE-179 -- {audio,video} require param child (or equivalent) -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/179
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-179: {audio,video} require param child (or equivalent) - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
paulc: since this closed on dec
1, we have not yet issued calls for counter proposals because
of our attempt to see what the web & tv IG will do
here
... chairs are on top of this and watching what is happening
here
... since there are so many other issues pending this doesn't
seem like a problem
ISSUE-133?
<trackbot> ISSUE-133 -- Add a modal attribute to html5 to indicate a modal segment of the DOM (modal dialog) -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/133
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-133: Add a modal attribute to html5 to indicate a modal segment of the DOM (modal dialog) - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
ISSUE-174?
<trackbot> ISSUE-174 -- potential conflict between Link: and <link> semantics -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/174
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-174: potential conflict between Link: and semantics - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
<pimpbot> bugmail: [Bug 12964] <video>: Declarative linking of full-text transcripts to video and audio elements <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0515.html> 4** [Bug 12794] <video> Add a non-normative note on how to provide text alternatives for media elements <11http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-bugzilla/2011Dec/0514.html> 4** [Bug 10919] Allow role="presentation" to override the default role of any element <
paulc: i haven't had chance to check on the status of this - does anybody know?
rubys: i haven't seen any objections either
paulc: probably move forward on consensus
ISSUE-177?
<trackbot> ISSUE-177 -- References to Internet-Drafts should be given as "Work in Progress" per RFC 2026. -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/177
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-177: References to Internet-Drafts should be given as "Work in Progress" per RFC 2026. - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
ISSUE-180?
<trackbot> ISSUE-180 -- Add "allow-popups" for iframe@sandbox -- open
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/180
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-180: Add "allow-popups" for iframe@sandbox - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
paulc: call for counter proposals ends on saturday
paulc: none
paulc: four calls for change proposals that close on jan 14 - an extra week to account for the end of year holiday period
ISSUE-186?
<trackbot> ISSUE-186 -- conformance error for use of role=presentation on interactive elements -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/186
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-186: conformance error for use of role=presentation on interactive elements - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
ISSUE-187?
<trackbot> ISSUE-187 -- Document conformance has to be stable over the time -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/187
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-187: Document conformance has to be stable over the time - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
ISSUE-188?
<trackbot> ISSUE-188 -- Text tracks in HTML should be defined in a way agnostic of the specific caption format -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/188
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-188: Text tracks in HTML should be defined in a way agnostic of the specific caption format - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
ISSUE-189?
<trackbot> ISSUE-189 -- Prefix convention needs to be coordinated with IETF -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/189
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-189: Prefix convention needs to be coordinated with IETF - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
paulc: we have a new issue 190, i've already prepared the call for change proposals and will likely go out today or tomorrow
paulc: none
paulc: none
krisk: met as planned on nov
29
... meet again dec 13
... that will be the last meeting of the year
<krisk> Notes -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Dec/0002.html
<pimpbot> Title: Re: MOSQUITO project to contribute to HTML5 tests from James Graham on 2011-12-07 (public-html-testsuite@w3.org from December 2011) (at lists.w3.org)
krisk: we've created an IDL
harness for testing WebIDL
... the MOSQUITO project from Europe will be submitting 47
input tests for HTML
<krisk> See -> http://html5.mosquito-fp7.eu/
<pimpbot> Title: HTML5 - MOSQUITO contribution (at html5.mosquito-fp7.eu)
krisk: that's all for today - questions?
janina: we continue to meet -
several of the subgroups are active
... change proposal was approved on the reopen request for
issue-131
ISSUE-131?
<trackbot> ISSUE-131 -- Should we add a caret location API to canvas, or is the focus API sufficient? -- closed
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131
<pimpbot> Title: ISSUE-131: Should we add a caret location API to canvas, or is the focus API sufficient? - HTML Weekly Tracker (at www.w3.org)
scribe: this is to define a
baseline - important for implementations
... previous proposal was not precise about this - proposed
options
... have agreement on what should suffice
... hopefully this will close the loop
... remainder of work is to look at bugs with status NEEDSINFO
or still need processing from the TF
... i think that's a fair summary of where we are
paulc: questions?
paulc: fyi - Open Web Platform summary for w/e 28th
http://www.w3.org/QA/2011/11/openweb-weekly-21.html
<pimpbot> Title: Open Web Platform Weekly Summary - 2011-11-21 - 2011-11-28 - W3C Blog (at www.w3.org)
<manu1> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Dec/0031.html
paulc: request for review of RDFa Lite FPWD
<pimpbot> Title: Request for Review of RDFa Lite FPWD from Manu Sporny on 2011-12-05 (public-html@w3.org from December 2011) (at lists.w3.org)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Dec/0031.html
manu: a little bit of background
might be helpful
... RDFa 1.1 was supposed to go to LC and be done by now and
there was a launch from all the search engine companies on an
effort called schema.org
... to make it easier to mark up people places events on the
web
... they want a lighter profile for RDFa before they want to
support it
... this lite spec is the work since last july up to now
... it is a stripped down version of RDFa - we don't want
implementers/authors/validators lives more difficult
... spec is meant as a best practice spec for how to use RDFa
simply
... HTML WG suggested asking for review by the WG so we could
take a look at it
... we've had two reviews so far
... we haven't put in the publication request but everything is
ready to go
... question mostly for the chairs is whether it's okay to send
the publication request out at this point
... it's a FPWD at this point
... should we go forward? should this document be co-produced
by the HTML WG and RDFa WG?
paulc: personal position
reflected in my comments - i'm a little concerned about
layering of specifications
... i think i understand why you're doing it - because it's
expeditious
... not convinced it's the correct layering
... on whether you should go ahead, i personally am not trying
to stand in the way of fpwd and always my mantra that only have
to have agreement to publish not content
... not seen any counter to publishing
... seen some commentary on the first issue which you've made
into an issue
... with my chair hat on i've seen no input from WG that you
shouldn't go ahead
rubys: should we go forward?
yes
... should it be joint deliverable? i don't have a position
on
paulc: second question is related to my comments
<paulc> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Dec/0049.html
<pimpbot> Title: RE: RDF Web Apps ISSUE-124 (was: Re: Request for Review of RDFa Lite FPWD) from Paul Cotton on 2011-12-08 (public-html@w3.org from December 2011) (at lists.w3.org)
paulc: suggest reviewing some of my comments
maciej: no comments from me
paulc: anyone on the call against
publishing this fpwd?
... since you've asked on public list and no comments here, i
suggest you go ahead
... objection to unanimous consent to moving ahead?
... none heard
<glenn> my question is on status of updating editor's draft, still stuck on November 4
manu: mention that in the future i will cc HTML WG when we do a transition for this document
<rubys> +1
manu: came as a surprise this
time which we didn't intend to happen
... we've got 2 new WDs coming out
... RDFa core and RDFa+HTML next week - will provide an update
then
paulc: believe you said in the
introduction that you want RDFa 1.1 to LC and having the lite
version was important
... when will 1.1 go to LC?
manu: we have two tracks of docs
- with and without dependency on HTML5
... we want the ones not dependent on HTML5 forward - RDFa Core
1.1 and RDFa+HTML 1.1
... HTML+RDFa and Lite are dependent on HTML5
<Zakim> manu1, you wanted to outline how we might work a bit more smoothly in the future.
paulc: Status of the W3C canvas2d
and html5 editors drafts
... we have a request from WG to figure out how to get the ED
created again
... we've met several times in the last week on this and intend
to meet again immediately after this call
... we don't have anything to report but #1 priority
... not the current timeline
... next important date is dec 31 for all bugs to be addressed
by editors
... in the last week bug count down from 120 to about 30
... editor, certainly of html5 spec, processing a large number
of bugs in the last week
... some have comments and a dialogue
... believe we're in good shape to meet this deadline
... remind wg members for items processed by the editors, next
date is jan 14 - last date where you can add TrackerRequest
keyword because you disagree
paulc: any volunteer to scribe
next week on dec 15?
... no volunteers - chairs will figure out who will chair and
scribe
paulc: meeting is adjourned
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: adrianba Found Scribe: Adrian Bateman Default Present: mjs, Julian, paulc, [Microsoft], adrianba, krisk, glenn, +1.732.238.aaaa, Sam, Janina_Sajka, +1.503.713.aabb, eliot, +1.503.713.aacc Present: mjs Julian paulc [Microsoft] adrianba krisk glenn +1.732.238.aaaa Sam Janina_Sajka +1.503.713.aabb eliot +1.503.713.aacc Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-wg-announce/2011OctDec/0019.html Found Date: 08 Dec 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/12/08-html-wg-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: IRC log location not specified! (You can ignore this warning if you do not want the generated minutes to contain a link to the original IRC log.)[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]