See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 18 October 2011
<ivan> oops, sorry, did not pay attention
<ivan> some virtual fire fighting
<scribe> scribenick: mhausenblas
PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
RESOLUTION: Accept the minutes of last meeting http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-RDB2RDF-minutes.html
Michael: heard from Juan he is on it
Souri: there were two more comments (Fabian, Dave)
<dmcneil> +q
dmcneil: just wanted to clarify - does this mean you change the note?
Souri: yes, change back to the four bullet points unless there are issues with it
<dmcneil> +q
<MacTed> issue-69?
<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel
ISSUE-69?
<trackbot> ISSUE-69 -- datatype sizes -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/69
Ashok: why are you converting to string from a number datatype column?
Souri: RDF is lexical - default
Ashok: seems fairly expansive, but I guess that's what RDF requires
Souri: yes
Ashok: second question, might
require Eric and Richard
... difference was when the number is bigger than what SQL spec
says
... didn't see such a discussion in the R2RML spec
Souri: I'm not 100% sure but I
think it is not there, no
... Different DB have different capabilities and
limitations
Ashok: with string, we wouldn't have the limitations, right?
David: We discussed within
Revelytix, if beyond limit it's undefined
... and re 'do we need to enumerate all cases' - would not be
necessary
ISSUE-68?
<trackbot> ISSUE-68 -- Multiple PredicateMaps in a PredicateObjectMap -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/68
Souri: The question is here
really, where do we stop?
... I guess we shouldn't introduce too many shortcuts -
introduces more point of failures
Dave: Need to dig deeper, but I think I'm with Souri on this one
<ivan> ISSUE-68?
<trackbot> ISSUE-68 -- Multiple PredicateMaps in a PredicateObjectMap -- raised
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/68
<Souri> POmap: Pmap+ Omap
<Souri> POmap: Pmap Omap
Souri: My guess is that it would rather a rare case
dmcneil: how do deal with new features?
Ivan: only, if it is triggered
from a LC comment
... this case is a bit tricky as it comes from within the
WG
... should likely have been treated before LC
Michael: Might be something for the F2F to resolve?
<Souri> I am definitely -1 on adding this shortcut (SP(+)O): SPO(+) is a much more common scenario (supported in Turtle, for example)
<Souri> yes, it is a shortcut
Ivan: Regardless of the process part, I'm not sure if adding more options is beneficial
Ivan: might be wise for the chairs to look into CR preparation
Michael: I agree
<Ashok> yes
[meeting adjourned]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: mhausenblas Inferring Scribes: mhausenblas Present: Joerg Michael Ivan Dave Ashok Souri Seema Ted Regrets: Marcelo Boris Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Oct/0038.html Found Date: 18 Oct 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/10/18-RDB2RDF-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]