15:02:00 RRSAgent has joined #htmlt
15:02:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/09/06-htmlt-irc
15:02:17 zakim, this is htmlt
15:02:17 sorry, krisk, I do not see a conference named 'htmlt' in progress or scheduled at this time
15:03:49 Looks like this will be all on IRC
15:04:26 Normal given the past meetings...
15:04:46 Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-testsuite/2011Sep/0001.html
15:05:48 Looks like a light meeting agenda...
15:06:01 Item #1 Check for and bugs on approved tests
15:06:22 Bug #12896 (old)
15:06:51 I recall that we were going to have plh come back to confirm that this is true
15:07:18 I'll send this out in the meeting notes since it's been a little while
15:07:56 I presume that Ms2ger believes that this is a valid bug since he opened the bug
15:08:32 If anyone else has feedback please respond either to the IRC, Meeting notes or in the bug itself
15:09:05 I'll add this to the next meeting to help drive this bug to closure
15:09:14 Actually
15:09:41 getElementsByClassName is now defined in DOM Core instead of HTML
15:10:13 So I'll move these tests to the WebApps repo
15:10:43 You should ping the Opera folks since the wrote most of the tests
15:11:04 jgraham, ^
15:11:57 IMHO standard practice is to remove tests if they are no longer normative
15:12:23 Bug #13875
15:13:25 Ms2ger could you send something to the list or add to the bug maybe a use case using httpd.js vs php?
15:13:49 Haven't had time to spend on that yet
15:14:19 Ok
15:20:53 Looks like you fixed/updated some canvas tests
15:21:01 (you meaning ms2ger)
15:21:08 I did
15:22:14 The TYPE_MISMATCH_ERR should be noted
15:22:25 Do you want to add more to the IRC on these changes?
15:22:51 No
15:25:52 Any reason?
15:26:20 The reason I ask is that this error case had really good browser interop (chrome, IE, Firefox, Opera)
15:26:30 Oh
15:27:00 No this is not the case...the IDL spec is leading - which seems odd
15:27:28 It would be alot easier to have the IDL spec just match all the browsers and canvas content on the web
15:28:40 It doesn't really matter which exception is thrown, IMO
15:28:51 Might as well pick a logical one
15:31:39 e.code == 17 (TYPE_MISMATCH_ERR) seems just fine
15:33:05 Anyway, if you think it's an issue, it's a spec issue
15:34:08 If we just care that an assert is thrown then the HTML test should be updated as such
15:34:37 Seems like it would be more valid to have some IDL cases in webapps rather then trying to test the web IDL spec via HTML tests
15:35:03 WebIDL is a normative dependency for HTML, so we should test the implications of that
15:37:23 That is fine just ned to call this out - better to be clear that this is a web IDL test case and not a HTML test case
15:37:37 It is an HTML test case
15:37:49 It is testing an interface defined in HTML
15:38:33 Still seems like a spec bug in IDL
15:39:37 I think TypeError makes more sense when you pass a value that doesn't match the type of the parameter, but please file a bug on WebIDL
15:40:42 Moving on Agenda Item #2 new test submissions
15:43:18 Any comments on test submission that people may want to be informed of?
15:45:12 Nothing in particular
15:45:28 OK - people can always look at the 'shortlog' http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/shortlog
15:46:03 Thats the end of the agenda
15:46:08 shall we adjourn?
15:46:18 OK
15:47:38 RRSAgent, make logs public
15:47:46 rrsagent, generate minutes
15:47:46 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/09/06-htmlt-minutes.html krisk
15:53:10 Oops
15:53:15 Forgot about this...
15:53:59 While you're here, you can move these getElementsByClassName tests: )
15:54:35 Or I could pretend that I didn't hear you
15:57:35 This is IRC, sticking fingers in your ears won't help :)
16:14:45 It's OK I stuck them in my eyes too
17:24:25 Ms2ger has joined #HTMLT
17:30:48 Zakim has left #htmlt
17:33:48 RRSAgent, bye
17:33:48 I see no action items