See also: IRC log
<Robert> me. apparently you can't hear me. i'll try again...
<burn> right, never heard you
Dan: received regrets from Bjorn and Olli
<burn> Scribe: Raj_Tumuluri
<burn> ScribeNick: Raj
<burn> Date: 9 June 2011
<mbodell> people interested in API: Dan Druta, possibly Charles
<burn> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/htmlspeech/live/NOTE-htmlspeech-20110609.html
Dan: Sent updated the document sent few days back with Michael Bodell's comments on use-cases, proposed solutions as well as updates from the last week's call..Any comments?
No comments from the group
Robert: Lot of people want to contribute, posted comments to the distribution list..
<Robert> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Jun/0002.html
Looking to finalize by August and give 2 weeks for comments
Robert: General design approach
and gleaned requirements on protocols from the requirements
docs..draft to be ready in June and refinements in July
... No comments from the group
Robert: Overall design approach:
use web-sockets transport, text msgs for signaling and binary
for media, included the proposal link
... Control msgs will be based on MRCP
... In the coming weeks flesh this out..
<Robert> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Jun/0020.html
Robert: Next steps to refine the
design : Next week, Milan is going to compile a sub-set of MRCP
for HTML+Speech, and then identify any other control msgs, we
may need, in parallel look at media translation
... Will provide an update next week
Michael_: audio
Robert: Requirements list is another topic:
<Robert> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Jun/att-0011/protocol-reqs.html
Robert: Marc has sifted through this and slotted those for easy reading..
<Robert> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Jun/0019.html
<Robert> those are my comments
Robert: Some of these requirements may be invalid, given our recent discussions, encourage others to go through
Dan: We are missing 2 of our
browser vendors today, afraid we may not be able to make any
design decisions today...
... May be better to defer that for the next call when they are
there...
Robet: OK with that..certainly comments I re-wrote were discussed at F2F and subsequently..since most of those are re-phrased, there may not be anything controversial
Michael_: DD35 may need to be reviewed
Dan: We will let people review
and comment by next week..since it is only correction and not
anything new..
... Some of the requirements are left in general section...need
to review the grouping etc..based on the design-decisions we
need to make on them
Robert: If anybody has any
observations, and identify changes, that will help in the prep
of next draft
... This is not the complete list, Marc has the protocol
related list
Marc: It would not be right choice to move them all to protocol section...keep numbering intact...lot of legacy reqs..present..feel it needs to updated to reflect the latest position
Dan: Will schedule something in the comign weeks
<burn> Michael's plan: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Jun/0021.html
mbodell: posted the update last night...most participants are not on the call..want to make sure that the list of participants updated as well..
Dan: I am in both Protocol and WebAPI..
mbodell: Bjorn, dan, dahl, olli, mbodell, danD, Charles
Raj: I will be in protocol group
Robert: We have many people, they may not have enough work to write..but can review
mbodell: Produce something
similar to what Marc produced for Protocol for WebAPI, on
design decisions and appraches
... identify and obtain concensus on parameters, events and
naming..
... markup bindings, associations, need to agree what we can
agree and document what we cannot agree on that..
... we may also consider having a group call a la protocol
group...for now can do this through email..
Dan: makes sense, I would object to adding another half hour to this call...should you really need we can accommodate that as part of the existing call itself..and allocated 30 minutes for that
mbodell: OK with that..
... design decisions: other than markup bindings, there were no
major decisions..
Dan: IDL and boundaries decisions needed some review..any update on decisions
mbodell: we may say nBest number
and create a prooperty describe that in text..
... functions to do the recog., results and text to
describe
Dan: Agreeing on basic design approach need not be today..but, I see mbodell expects to agree on the approach today and flesh out details in subgroup..any objections?
Robert: Only concern is that key people ( browser vendors) are not on call.( Olli and Bjorn)
Dan: Olli's concerns were around security and he may not have objections to approach
mbodell: if group doesn't agree completely, then we will document the objections/disagreements
Dan: Noted that there is general consensus, noting Google and Mozilla may be orthogonal
mbodell: Javascript recognition
result is the point of concern
... the objections Olli has may not affect the rest of the
approach
Dan: if they affect the rest of the API, that can be resolved in sub-group
mbodell: yes, and if any new objections are found, they can be discussed in subgroup too
<burn> actually, point of concern is not JS reco result, but how you bind to HTML markup
Dan: Any other comments from anybody ? Since we are missing key browser vendors, am concerned about moving forward with design decisions
mbodell: reviewing the design
requirements for APIs ( a la Marc's work on protocol)
... any volunteers
I volunteer for that
mbodell: another task that needs a volunteer is how to handle results from continuous reco, grammar conversation, IDL and text etc..we can do that in parallel
Dan_Druta: we discussed at F2F capabilities and that also needs to be fleshed ..and volunteer to do that..
dahl: put skeleton document on what needs to be fleshed and assign people to sections
mobdell & Dan_Druita: agree
ddahl: want to look at the list and pick that are most interesting ;-)
mbodell: to prepare the list and circulate
Dan: prepared to postpone
remaining items to next week..anything else to discuss
today?
... thanks group
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.136 of Date: 2011/05/12 12:01:43 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: Raj_Tumuluri Found ScribeNick: Raj Present: Dan_Burnett Raj_Tumuluri Michael_Bodell Paolo_Baggia Patrick_Ehlen Michael_Johnston Marc_Schroeder Milan_Young Dan_Druta Charles_Hemphill Robert_Brown Debbie_Dahl Regrets: Bjorn_Bringert Olli_Pettay Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Jun/0024.html Found Date: 09 Jun 2011 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/06/09-htmlspeech-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]