ACTION-15: Look into mechanisms to handle incoming notifications, and report to WG
Look into mechanisms to handle incoming notifications, and report to WG
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Dan Druta
- Due on:
- November 16, 2011
- Created on:
- November 9, 2011
- Related emails:
- [minutes] March 13 Teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2012-03-14)
- Regarding Action-15 (from stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com on 2012-03-09)
- Open actions on the action tracker (from harald@alvestrand.no on 2012-03-06)
- Re: [rtcweb] Logistics for the upcoming interim (from stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com on 2012-01-07)
- Re: Housekeeping: Open actions in the WG tracker (from mmanig@gmail.com on 2011-12-09)
- Housekeeping: Open actions in the WG tracker (from harald@alvestrand.no on 2011-12-09)
Related notes:
Per presentation in SC.
relevant specs include "server-sent events" and "Web notifications".
Question is whether they fill our need or not (and what that need is).
A presentation was given by Dan at the f2f meeting Feb 1st 2012. http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/File:WebRTCPushNotifications.pdf
http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webrtc/wiki/File:WebRTC_PushNotifications_v1.1.pdf
[dom]: see public-webapps thread http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JanMar/1077.html
13 Mar 2012, 16:13:29Display change log.