W3C

- DRAFT -

Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Working Group Teleconference

17 Feb 2011

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
+1.727.391.aaaa, James_Nurthen, Michael_Cooper, Marc_Johlic, Bruce_Bailey, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Adam_Solomon, David_MacDonald
Regrets
Chair
Loretta_Guarino_Reid
Scribe
David

Contents


<trackbot> Date: 17 February 2011

is WCAG a good home for HTML 5 techniques before the standard is settled... not for discussion today but to think about

James recommended that we publish them with a note something like "these techniques are based on the current status of the standard and may change..."

<Loretta> Note: IT IS PREFERABLE FOR LINKS TO BE VISIBLE AT ALL TIMES, SINCE USERS NAVIGATING VIA THE KEYBOARD INCLUDE switch users, those using techniques that generate keyboard strokes slowly, screen magnification software users, screen reader users working with sighted colleagues, keyboard only users and those navigating using voice recognition software. HOWEVER, SUCCESS CRITERION 2.4.1 DOES NOT REQUIRE THAT THEY BE VISIBLE WHEN THEY DO NOT HAVE FOCUS, AND LINKS

http://www.w3.org/TR/UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20/navigation-mechanisms-focus-visible.html

Resolution: accept as proposed Issue LC-2456: Reword G1 'Description' and 'Note'. (This will make "Skip to Main" as a permanent visible link)

Resolution accept as proposed: Issue LC-2469: SCR19 applies to SC 3.2.2 too

Issue LC-2438: Test in G68 does not seem to fit

resolution: accept as amended Issue LC-2438: Test in G68 does not seem to fit

Issue LC-2427: F61: 24 hours?

Resolution: accept as amended Issue LC-2427: F61: 24 hours? (changed from 24 hours to 10x the default change of context time.
... WCAG group accept with suggestions EOWG is proposing an update to WCAG 2 at a Glance.

Issue LC-2466: Requirement for 200% text increase nearly impossible to meet in most cases

<MichaelC> http://trace.wisc.edu/wcag_wiki/index.php?title=Post_WCAG_2#Techniques

resolution: Accept as proposed:Issue LC-2466: Requirement for 200% text increase nearly impossible to meet in most cases

Issue LC-2445: The test for the correct use of longdesc should be conditional on its application

resolution: accept as amended Issue LC-2445: The test for the correct use of longdesc should be conditional on its application

was before last topic... Issue LC-2443: The test should include a check whether the function to turn off blinking content is documented

<MichaelC> ACTION: cooper to draft a section about testing techniques for the Introduction to Techniques, relates to comment 2445 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-125 - Draft a section about testing techniques for the Introduction to Techniques, relates to comment 2445 [on Michael Cooper - due 2011-02-24].

ccept as amended Issue LC-2443: The test should include a check whether the function to turn off blinking content is documented

resolution: accept as amended Issue LC-2443: The test should include a check whether the function to turn off blinking content is documented

reolution: accept as amended Issue LC-2447: Test whether all th Elements have scope attribute misleading

Issue LC-2448: use of fieldset should not be required for any group of logically related input elements

<scribe> ACTION: Loretta to reword H71 for comment LC2448 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-126 - Reword H71 for comment LC2448 [on Loretta Guarino Reid - due 2011-02-24].

<MichaelC> action-126: see comments in http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35422/20110127misc/results#x2448

<trackbot> ACTION-126 Reword H71 for comment LC2448 notes added

Issue LC-2457: H93 and H94 are out of place

Issue LC-2449: Test for percent is in itself not meaningful, should encompass %, em, font size names

Resolution: accepted as amended Issue LC-2449: Test for percent is in itself not meaningful, should encompass %, em, font size names

Issue LC-2450: Test contradicts other options to meet SC 1.4.4

resolution: accept as amended Issue LC-2450: Test contradicts other options to meet SC 1.4.4

Issue LC-2451: Check for CSS seems less useful than test for use of deprecated elements (e.g., font, center, strike, i, b, u)

<scribe> topic: Issue LC-2451: Check for CSS seems less useful than test for use of deprecated elements (e.g., font, center, strike, i, b, u)

resolution: accept as amended Issue LC-2451: Check for CSS seems less useful than test for use of deprecated elements (e.g., font, center, strike, i, b, u)

Issue LC-2437: I think there is a failure missing

<scribe> ACTION: on Adam to look into the issue surrounding 2437 comment, and get back to the working group... [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - on

<scribe> ACTION: Adam to look into the issue surrounding 2437 comment, and get back to the working group.. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-127 - Look into the issue surrounding 2437 comment, and get back to the working group.. [on Adam Solomon - due 2011-02-24].

Resolution: leave open 2437 pending adam's research
... accept as amended Issue LC-2459: Table heading in H63

Issue LC-2433: SM6, SM7: SC 1.2.5

<MichaelC> trackbot, end meeting

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Adam to look into the issue surrounding 2437 comment, and get back to the working group.. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action04]
[NEW] ACTION: cooper to draft a section about testing techniques for the Introduction to Techniques, relates to comment 2445 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Loretta to reword H71 for comment LC2448 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: on Adam to look into the issue surrounding 2437 comment, and get back to the working group... [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action03]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.135 (CVS log)
$Date: 2011/02/17 23:16:47 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: David
Inferring Scribes: David
Default Present: +1.727.391.aaaa, James_Nurthen, Michael_Cooper, Marc_Johlic, Bruce_Bailey, Katie_Haritos-Shea, Adam_Solomon, David_MacDonald
Present: +1.727.391.aaaa James_Nurthen Michael_Cooper Marc_Johlic Bruce_Bailey Katie_Haritos-Shea Adam_Solomon David_MacDonald
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2011JanMar/0028.html
Found Date: 17 Feb 2011
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html

WARNING: No person found for ACTION item: on adam to look into the issue surrounding 2437 comment, and get back to the working group... [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/02/17-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action03]

People with action items: adam cooper loretta

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]