14:49:00 RRSAgent has joined #webfonts 14:49:00 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/01/26-webfonts-irc 14:49:09 rrsagent, start telcon 14:49:09 I'm logging. I don't understand 'start telcon', Vlad. Try /msg RRSAgent help 14:49:22 rrsagent help 14:51:35 rrsagent, start telecon 14:51:35 I'm logging. I don't understand 'start telecon', Vlad. Try /msg RRSAgent help 14:51:56 trackbot, start telcon 14:51:58 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:51:58 Zakim has joined #webfonts 14:52:00 Zakim, this will be 3668 14:52:00 ok, trackbot; I see IA_Fonts()10:00AM scheduled to start in 8 minutes 14:52:01 Meeting: WebFonts Working Group Teleconference 14:52:01 Date: 26 January 2011 14:52:18 Chair Vlad 14:52:43 Chair: Vlad 14:57:27 IA_Fonts()10:00AM has now started 14:57:34 jfkthame_afk has joined #webfonts 14:57:34 +??P16 14:58:45 Regrets: Tal, ChrisL, Sylvain 14:58:53 zakim, this is 3668 14:58:53 Vlad, this was already IA_Fonts()10:00AM 14:58:54 ok, Vlad; that matches IA_Fonts()10:00AM 14:59:18 + +4845397aaaa 15:00:14 zakim, 4845397aaaa is jfkthame 15:00:14 sorry, jfkthame, I do not recognize a party named '4845397aaaa' 15:00:16 zakim, +??P16 is Vlad 15:00:16 sorry, Vlad, I do not recognize a party named '+??P16' 15:00:39 zakim, ??P16 is Vlad 15:00:39 +Vlad; got it 15:00:39 zakim, +4845397aaaa is jfkthame 15:00:40 tal has joined #webfonts 15:00:43 +jfkthame; got it 15:01:04 + +47.21.65.aabb 15:02:12 + +1.425.882.aacc 15:02:16 + +1.443.895.aadd 15:02:44 sergeym has joined #webfonts 15:02:56 - +1.443.895.aadd 15:03:42 +??P13 15:04:17 + +1.443.895.aaee 15:04:22 + +1.510.816.aaff 15:04:37 vlad, i'm only catching 50% of what you're saying, at best 15:05:01 erik has joined #webfonts 15:05:44 I'm calling in on skype, I can't actually make out anyone, sorry. 15:05:45 cslye has joined #webfonts 15:08:14 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2011Jan/0024.html 15:08:41 Reviewing open actions. 15:11:03 action 56? 15:11:03 Sorry, bad ACTION syntax 15:12:01 action-56? 15:12:01 ACTION-56 -- Jonathan Kew to tag wrng size compressed meta as a ua assert -- due 2010-12-15 -- OPEN 15:12:01 http://www.w3.org/Fonts/WG/track/actions/56 15:12:16 action-56: pending 15:12:16 ACTION-56 Tag wrng size compressed meta as a ua assert notes added 15:14:09 Changed Action-56 to "pending review." 15:15:59 sergeym has joined #webfonts 15:16:15 Action-60 can be closed. 15:18:27 Discussion about Action-62. 15:18:59 Will pick up later or discuss later. 15:20:57 Discussion about the meaning Action-66. 15:22:42 Action-69 can be closed. Vlad completed this one. 15:23:34 Discussion of comments from Bert Bos. 15:23:47 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2011JanMar/0009.html 15:24:55 Point 1: Vlad asked for clarification. 15:25:33 Håkon: agrees with Bert's comment. 15:26:14 Thinks that the comment is about SOR and relates to recent discussion on list. 15:26:28 Vlad: not sure that it is about SOR. 15:27:36 Håkon: Thinks that there is not yet a consensus on SOR. 15:28:11 Håkon: WOFF would have a better shot at interoperability if there is consensus on SOR. 15:28:45 Vlad: We should discuss this but not today as we are discussion Bert's comments. 15:29:32 Discussion about when to discuss SOR. 15:29:56 Håkon: We don't have all browser vendors here. 15:31:15 Tal: They have been invited. It is their responsibility to call in. 15:31:38 Vald: This is not on the agenda for the day. Let's discuss this later. 15:32:07 Vlad: THis will be a detailed discussion so let's set up a call specifically for this topic. 15:33:04 Back to Bert's comments. 15:34:21 Point 2: 15:34:54 Vlad: We agree with Bert that we have made the intro as clear as we can. Any other comments for making it even more clear are welcome. 15:35:05 sergeym has joined #webfonts 15:36:40 Vald: "Despite this name, WOFF should be regarded as a container format or "wrapper" for font data in already-existing formats rather than an actual font format in its own right." 15:37:32 Vlad: Perhaps add "Despite the name, WOFF is not a new font format and should be regarded as..." 15:37:52 Christopher: Thinks that the language is clear enough as is. 15:38:31 Jonathan: No strong view either way. Doesn't mind changing it but isn't sure that any value will be added. 15:40:05 Vlad: Should we create an action item to review the first paragraph of the introduction? 15:40:30 Christopher: Bert's comment was "it sounds good" so why are we discussing changing it? 15:40:43 Vlad: This one particular sentence could be more specific. 15:41:02 Point 3: 15:42:40 Jonathan: His original tool, and the spec, did not pad. Not sure when the optional padding made it into the spec. 15:42:54 Vlad: Any objections to wat Bert proposes? 15:44:07 Tal: If we make that SHOULD a MUST, would a UA have to test and reject? 15:44:39 Jonathan: UA could test with the header length of file and length of block. 15:45:37 Vlad and Tal: Would that contradict the "Private Data should not effect the font data..." section of the spec? 15:46:01 Jonathan: This would be a problem with the header, not the private data. 15:47:26 Jonathan: UA could do simple sanity checks on header fields. 15:48:32 Vlad: Does that need to be mentioned in the header? 15:48:48 Jonathan: Reads spec. We already call for the UA to check those offsets. 15:50:16 Vlad: Should we not mention padding the private data? 15:51:19 Jonathan: We could repeat that the end of the private data block must be the end of the file. 15:51:42 Vlad: Agrees with Jonathan. 15:52:44 Tal: Agrees. 15:53:56 Scribe: Tal 15:54:35 Action Jonathan Replace last sentence of section 7: End of Private Data block must correspond with the end of the last file. 15:54:35 Created ACTION-70 - Replace last sentence of section 7: End of Private Data block must correspond with the end of the last file. [on Jonathan Kew - due 2011-02-02]. 15:55:05 Scribenick: tal 15:56:10 Discussion on if this should apply to the metadata block as well. 15:56:35 Vlad: Metadata section is clear. 15:57:35 Point 4: 15:57:41 sergeym has joined #webfonts 15:57:56 Vlad: Can anyone clarify what this means? 15:58:30 Action Chris Clarify Bert Bos' Point 4 15:58:30 Created ACTION-71 - Clarify Bert Bos' Point 4 [on Chris Lilley - due 2011-02-02]. 15:58:56 Point 5: 15:59:55 Vlad: not sure how useful it would be to not store origLength. 16:00:34 Jonathan: UA needs to know original length to allocate buffer otherwise it is more cumbersome to decode. 16:01:28 Action Jonathan Respond to Bert Bos' Point 5. 16:01:28 Created ACTION-72 - Respond to Bert Bos' Point 5. [on Jonathan Kew - due 2011-02-02]. 16:01:58 Sergey: origLength is also useful for recreating table directory. 16:04:04 Sergey: Mentions email to list that has not been discussed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-font/2011JanMar/0005.html 16:04:42 Tal: This can be created dynamically. 16:04:51 Sergey: Yes. We should mention this in the spec. 16:04:57 sergeym has joined #webfonts 16:05:17 - +1.510.816.aaff 16:05:21 cslye has left #webfonts 16:06:05 rrsagent, create minutes 16:06:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/01/26-webfonts-minutes.html Vlad 16:06:15 - +1.425.882.aacc 16:07:05 Thank you all! 16:07:08 - +1.443.895.aaee 16:07:14 -jfkthame 16:07:16 -??P13 16:07:22 erik has left #webfonts 16:07:34 - +47.21.65.aabb 16:12:25 -Vlad 16:12:27 IA_Fonts()10:00AM has ended 16:12:29 Attendees were Vlad, jfkthame, +47.21.65.aabb, +1.425.882.aacc, +1.443.895.aadd, +1.443.895.aaee, +1.510.816.aaff 16:19:01 jfkthame has left #webfonts 16:32:01 tal has joined #webfonts 17:23:31 Zakim has left #webfonts