See also: IRC log
<joakim> I am calling in ..
<scribe> scribe: wbailer
<scribe> chair: joakim
<joakim> http://www.w3.org/2010/04/26-mediaann-minutes.htmlhttp://www.w3.org/2010/05/18-mediaann-minutes.html
accepted
topic next meeting
scheduled for Jun 8
<joakim> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/track/actions/open
close action-249
<trackbot> ACTION-249 Come up with an ontology proposal on the basis of the Task Force Meeting in the 7th MAWG F2F closed
tobias sent mail regading this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2010Jun/0003.html
action-258 to be done after lc
action-259 pending
action-260 pending
joakim: api doc ready for
lc
... ontology doc not finished
... wonsuk will finish by tomorrow
... will be published Tue 8th
... thierry will be document contact person
... for both docs
joakim: we have difficulties
getting test suite started
... we should start with something not too complex
... would be good to have results before summer
(going back to this topic as thierry joined)
thierry: started to work on docs
to make them ready for lc
... for api doc: removed script, used output
... use proper css, added proper uris and status
... one issue pending: currently using css level 3, checker
uses 2.1
... contacted publication team about how to proceed on this
issue
joakim: last call announcement (single sentence description)
thierry: use abstract or subset
of abstract
... to be shown in public area of w3c pages
... can be modified at any time
... no urgency right now, using the abstract should be
fine
... ontology document
... considered it to be done, but wonsuk needs to make some
updates
... waiting for updates, if updates are not there by today, we
need to postpone to next tuesday
... impact on lc review: must be at least 4 weeks
... planned to end review period on Jul 5
... might need to be extended
... we can send a prior announcement to the groups from which
we expect feedback
... ask if planned review deadline is ok for them
... ping groups during review period
... most of the groups will send comments at end of review
period
joakim: do we need to have the namespace doc?
thierry: namespace doc for latest
version (shortname)
... not sure if namespace doc for ontology is needed
veronique: would be good to make ontology available
thierry: if we use uri for a
namespace, something needs to be there
... e.g. a page saying this is the namespace, and has links to
schema, etc
... stable uri for document is latest version, this is
there
<Vero> http://www.w3.org/2006/03/wn/wn20/instances/synset-component-noun-3.rdf
veronique: we should use similar approach for ontology
<Vero> example of namespace hosted on the W3C side
thierry: can we postpone this to
next version?
... namespace in ontology doc resolves to a page
... namespace is reserved
<pchampin> but it serves HTML as text... :-/
thierry: can be modified later is needed
joakim: tables has different cell
colors
... maybe wonsuk is fixing this
thierry: will take another look at this
joakim: tables should be striped
thierry: looks fine in
firefox
... could be css problem, need to check
joakim: at f2f, we wanted to find automatic way to include mapping tables into ontology doc, now it has been done manually
thierry: xslt stylesheet could be used for this purpose
<scribe> ACTION: thierry to provide xslt stylesheet for including tables into ontology doc before candidate rec publication [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/01-mediaann-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-261 - Provide xslt stylesheet for including tables into ontology doc before candidate rec publication [on Thierry Michel - due 2010-06-08].
<scribe> ACTION: thierry to correct css of tables in ontology doc [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/01-mediaann-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-262 - Correct css of tables in ontology doc [on Thierry Michel - due 2010-06-08].
close action-258
<trackbot> ACTION-258 Ask thierry about javascript solution for automatically integrating mapping tables into ontology doc closed
thierry: is it right that it is in the minutes to go to lc?
joakim: we voted for lc if the changes on the wiki page are done; this are done now
thierry: take another vote to agree to lc?
we had agreed to move to LC under the condition that the issues at http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/Issues_for_LC are resolved
<pchampin> +1
these issues are now resolved
resolution: both documents can be moved to lc
<tmichel_> +1
<joakim> +1
<Vero> +1
<tmichel_> tmichel@w3.org
<tmichel_> Resolution: API and Onthology moving LC
thierry: short explanation of
process after going to lc
... we should get comments at least from wgs we have
dependencies with
... we may get feedback from thepublic
... will be tracking this comments, there is a tool called lc
tracker
... for each comment it gives the status
... each comment will be discussed, thierry will send repsonse
to commentor
... commentor can agree to response or ask for more
explanation
... until final agreement
... in some cases it might not be possible to reach
agreement
... group may disagree with comments, needs to be marked as not
fulfilled
... not fulfilled comments need to be discussed with
director
... it is up to the director to accept decision of group or
not
... tim berners lee or a representative of him will do
this
... lc tracker is tool for tracking status of each comment,
propose to use this
thierry offers to do tracking of the comments
thierry: tracker will be opened
next week, will present it in telco next week or in 2
weeks
... all comments need to be answered to exit lc
<scribe> ... new version of document including agreed comments has to be issued
<scribe> ACTION: thierry to provide info on hotel and logistics for upcoming f2f [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/01-mediaann-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-263 - Provide info on hotel and logistics for upcoming f2f [on Thierry Michel - due 2010-06-08].
[meeting adjourned]
<pchampin> bye bye :)
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: s/publioshed/published/ Succeeded: s/issues/issued/ Found Scribe: wbailer Inferring ScribeNick: wbailer Present: joakim veronique pierre-antoine thierry werner Regrets: Raphael Florian Chris Wonsuk Daniel Felix Tobias Got date from IRC log name: 01 Jun 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/01-mediaann-minutes.html People with action items: thierry[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]