See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel
<trackbot> If you want to associate this channel with an existing Tracker, please say 'trackbot, associate this channel with #channel' (where #channel is the name of default channel for the group)
<krisk> light attendance
<gsnedders> Zakim: what's the code?
<krisk> I'll start in a few more minutes, in case anyone wants to attend but is running a bit late
<gsnedders> adrianba: need a question mark,
<scribe> scribenick:adrianba
<scribe> scribenick: adrianba
krisk: 4 open actions items
... closed 1, 3, 4
... action-2 extended date - this is for mercurial
... due on philippe
... should be set-up in february
... is this just something to check in to or will there be a
web server too?
gsnedders: usual set-up is to have web access
krisk: these are just some of the details we need to work through, accounts, etc.
krisk: can anyone create a reference test?
gsnedders: should have some tests for content sniffing
krisk: existing html tests added to wiki
<gsnedders> … somewhere, can't find them
<krisk> for example -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Existing_Html5_Tests
<krisk> lists some content sniffing tests
krisk: this would help towards parsing tests and get the group comfortable with our reference tests
<krisk> any objections to starting with for parser tests?
krisk: at the last meeting we
talked about focussing on the parser
... are there any particular places we want to start?
gsnedders: starting with the html5lib tests would be a good start
<krisk> I'll take a peek at these and create a few action items to help move forward
gsnedders: parser tests should be
quite up to date
... used in validator and gecko html5 parser
... shouldn't be far behind the spec
<krisk> sounds good
gsnedders: question about
tokeniser tests because these can't really be run in a browser
without direct access to the tokeniser?
... don't think anyone has tried to use them to actually test
within a browser before - might need to think about a different
format here
krisk: ok
... should we create an action to track this and look for a
volunteer?
... think that's it on parser tests for today
krisk: for example, making sure
that if you write a test then it doesn't incorrectly fail
because of something else you're dependent on
... specifically on the OM tests
<gsnedders> OM?
krisk: it might be a good idea to
create an action to make some simple tests to prove the
dependencies work
... OM=object model tests
... say you're testing how a control or element can be styled,
don't use some new CSS4 selector
... this wouldn't be a good test for the none CSS4 thing
<krisk> any objections?
krisk: that's all on the
agenda
... anything else
... okay, adjourned then - thanks
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found ScribeNick: adrianba Found ScribeNick: adrianba Inferring Scribes: adrianba WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Microsoft adrianba gsnedders krisk scribenick trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 26 Jan 2010 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2010/01/26-HTMLT-minutes.html People with action items:[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]