ISSUE-51: Shall dataset clauses be allowed in SPARQL/update?
Shall dataset clauses be allowed in SPARQL/update?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Raised by:
- Opened on:
- 2009-11-03
- Description:
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 (from Souripriya.Das@oracle.com on 2010-08-09)
- SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Aug. 10, 2010 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-08-09)
- tomorrow's agenda (and initial open ISSUES summary.. ) (from axel.polleres@deri.org on 2010-07-26)
- Agenda for today in 2 hours (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-03-09)
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 (from SOURIPRIYA.DAS@oracle.com on 2010-03-02)
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 (from steve.harris@garlik.com on 2010-03-01)
- SPARQL WG Agenda - March 2, 2010 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-03-01)
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-22)
- SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 23 (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-20)
- Re: Pending issues for update (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2010-02-19)
- Pending issues for update (from gearon@ieee.org on 2010-02-16)
- Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2009-11-23)
- Re: RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (from andy.seaborne@talis.com on 2009-11-23)
- RDF datasets for SPARQL Update? (from lee@thefigtrees.net on 2009-11-23)
Related notes:
[LeeF_]: See also use cases in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2009OctDec/0581.html
23 Dec 2009, 18:49:45[LeeF]: See also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010JanMar/0165.html and following thread
19 Jan 2010, 14:51:26Display change log