See also: IRC log
<francois> F2F registration results so far
Jo: If you haven't done so yet, please indicate if you will attend f2f.
Jo: Lots of good comments just this morning.
<francois> list of last call comments on MWABP (member-only)
Jo: Just arrived on BP-comments list.
<francois> Initial comments from Marc Wilson
Jo: Where are we with latest editorial revisions.
Adam: I've started - hope to
cover them this weeks.
... What do to with comments?
Jo: If you want to make some initial responses that would help. We'll discuss as a group before replying.
Adam: OK.
François: No need to be that formal. If you want to reply to Mark directly on the comments list that would be fine. Might be better to engage with commenters earlier.
<francois> ACTION: adam to review comments from Marc Wilson and trigger discussion as needed [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/10-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1024 - Review comments from Marc Wilson and trigger discussion as needed [on Adam Connors - due 2009-11-17].
Jo: Status of replies - we haven't had many.
François: we need to chase people down. We had many comments on the initial last call wd - we must know if they approve or not our final decision. I will take an action to chase people down.
<francois> ACTION: daoust to try to get replies from commenters of the first last call working draft of CT [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/11/10-bpwg-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1025 - Try to get replies from commenters of the first last call working draft of CT [on François Daoust - due 2009-11-17].
+1 on Bruce's presentation [saw it at FOWA].
Jo: Ed's comments. Worth
deferring discussion until he is here.
... I think we face a choice at this stage on moving ahead with
this or having it stay in LC forever.
François: We shouldn't worry right now on group not being chartered after December.
Jo: Would another group be prepared to take it on?
François: only plan would be charter extension.
Jo: I am not in favour of making substantive changes... I don't think the document will ever finish if we don't finish it...
Chaals: If there are required substantive changes then I think we will have a difficult time getting the group consider to go on... I think we need to at some time grapple with Ed's issues.
<SeanP> +1 to not making radical changes to the CT Guidelines
Jo: I agree but Ed's issues are additional issues. We should consider his contributions but should we decide to enact them then that would [kill] the document.
Chaals: the way to avoid that is to grapple with the issues and resolve that we don't have any action to take on them.
+1 to not making radical changes.
+1 to ending the group on time if at all possible.
Jo: Contributions of tests - anything else to say?
[no]
Dan: won't we need a charter extension anyway to shepherd the docs to R?
François: Yes. The group won't have much to do during this time but we will need the group to be operating for administrative reasons.
Jo: Suggest François find out what we will need to do.
François: Would be similar to how DD operated.
Jo: AOB?
[none]
<chaals> bye.. thanks Jo, Dan
Jo: In all likelyhood next week's call will be cancelled [due to lack of chairs].
ciao!