<trackbot> Date: 28 September 2009

<jeanne> hi, just started trackbot, I havne't entered in anything else yet.

<scribe> Meeting: WAI AU

public-atag2-comments@w3.org

<scribe> Scribe: Greg_Pisocky

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0063.html

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0033.html

<Greg> Review of Action Items around techniques

<Greg> 1- Part A Techniques reviews:

<Greg> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0033.html

<Greg> - Tim and Andrew have sent reviews.

<scribe> ACTION: GP to review section A.3.4-7 for Techniques [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/28-au-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-189 - Review section A.3.4-7 for Techniques [on Greg Pisocky - due 2009-10-05].

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0053.html

<Greg> SN A.3.1 - A.3.3, TB A.4

<Greg> New assignements for part B

<Greg> Action TB to get B.1

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - TB

<scribe> ACTION: TB to Review techniques for B.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/28-au-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - TB

<scribe> ACTION: JT to Review techniques for B.2.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/28-au-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-190 - Review techniques for B.2.1 [on Jutta Treviranus - due 2009-10-05].

<Greg> Jan: Let's think about the publishing schedule. Aim for a stablization draft by the end of October

<Greg> End of October appears to be doable.

<Greg> Internal deadline is October 16, 2009

<Greg> JR: Please come prepared with solutions to accompany any critiques you may have

For discussion and approval of publishing on Oct. 19

<Greg> JT: We discussed repositioning techniques from how they were drafted in ATAG 1.0 to be more of an "understanding" document.

<Greg> Jan: Are there any objections to repositioning techniques to be an "Understanding ATAG 2.0" type of document?

Resolution: Re-position ATAG 2.0 Techniques to become Understanding ATAG 2.0

<Greg> Success criteria proposed for B.2.1.x

<Greg> JT: The proposal can be reconstructed from a discussiont we had (JT and JR)

Email exchange between Jan and Jutta....

JT: Maybe good to merge into one success criterion
... What we are trying to communicate is htat authoring tool would give author some info on the accessiblity impact of technology choices
... Info that supports them on deciding what choices to make
... Info would include info about authoring tool's support of that tech, possibility links to eternal info on making that tech accessible

]JT: Primary idea is to help users make intelligent choices before they make them...to prevent need for repair later

JT: Make sense

GP: Basic idea ok

JR: Most basic level would be documenting degree of support for authoring accessibily with that tool in that tech

JS: Particularly with a toolkit...where would repository of this info be...

JT: Explain?
... Toolkits (DOJO, JQuery) etc. have info on accessibility support, degree of ARIA support....
... An authoring tool that made use of them could pick up that information

JS: Some kind of central repositpry we could point to?

JT: Yes
... There are some large international projects monitoring these things
... Within our "Understanding ATAG" can we point to external things?

JR: Yes

JT: Another example .... author wants to add video...multiple formats have different abilities re: captions etc.
... Best to know wthis info ahead of time

JR: To send wording on Tuesday to the list

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135  of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Jan
Found Scribe: Greg_Pisocky

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Jeanne, Jan, Greg_Pisocky, Tim_Boland, Treviranus, +1.561.582.aaaa, SueAnnN
Present: Greg_Pisocky Jan Jeanne SueAnnN Tim_Boland Treviranus
Regrets: Ann McMeekin
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2009JulSep/0063.html
Found Date: 28 Sep 2009
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/09/28-au-minutes.html
People with action items: gp jt tb

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report