See also: IRC log
Jo: Apologies for not not having everything ready on time
Adam: getting there
Jo: why don't you do the editorial stuff in the mean time
Kai: I will process the updates and convert the document to a regular and consistent HTML document.
<PhilA2> Hello, that sounds like Kai
Jo: Do we need another editorial session?
Kai: not for the time being, let me clean it up, and let's discuss the result with the group.
jo: life is a bit crazy after the holiday. Francois, you have some actions to tidy up. Status?
francois: was waiting on the latest version to do it only once.
jo: I need to get back into it. Want to do it by Friday...
francois: there are two topics for discussion. 1) comment from Graham Klyne, from ITS, 2) the crossside scripting tests that Chaals provided
jo: Klyne's comments should be
covered by the latest draft. Need to review that.
... we can't prove through tests that crosside scripting is not
a problem
francois: I read an article recently mentioning that 80% of existing problems were based on crosside scripting attacks
jo: if we make these tests normative then we freeze them but we want people to think about it and be flexible
francois: we may just provide a few tests
jo: [getting Bruce
uptodate]
... we are asking what are trying to say?
<EdC> My question is: what _exact_ properties are enforced if these tests pass successfully? At least, we should be able to state what level of security / safety is ensured by these tests (even if not 100% safety).
jo: might be useful for Chaals or Opera to formulate a concise statement
<jo> ACTION: bruce to follow up within Opera as to what exactly the XSS test scripts supplied by chaals guard against [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/09/01-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-1003 - Follow up within Opera as to what exactly the XSS test scripts supplied by chaals guard against [on Bruce Lawson - due 2009-09-08].
<brucel> groovy
Jo: We need to think about
timelines for finishing documents
... we have 4 months. We need to hurry up.
<jeffs> suggest merging ACTION 910 and ACTION 924
Jo: any other business?
<jo> ACTION-910?
<trackbot> ACTION-910 -- Jeffrey Sonstein to get review canvas tag materials and suggest how/if to address in BP -- due 2009-03-10 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/910
<jo> ACTION-924?
<trackbot> ACTION-924 -- Daniel Appelquist to and Jeffs to wander the highways and byways of SVG and Canvas and cook something up for the group's approval -- due 2009-04-02 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/924
<jeffs> two diff versions of the same thing addressed by my draft materials emailed out today
<jeffs> I just set to pending review
<jeffs> +1 to closing 910
<jo> close ACTION-910
<trackbot> ACTION-910 Get review canvas tag materials and suggest how/if to address in BP closed
<EdC> +1
<jeffs> +1
<yeliz> :)
<PhilA2> Short and sweet, bye
<brucel> hugs