See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 25 June 2009
<billyjackass> hmm, do I have my times wrong?
<MikeSmith> I guess I must
<MikeSmith> gotta cut back on the kush
<trackbot> Meeting: HTML Weekly Teleconference
<trackbot> Date: 25 June 2009
<MikeSmith> Joshue: can you be on the call today?
Hi Mike, yes I will dial in.
<MikeSmith> excellent, great
<Stevef> what't the dial in code/
Hi Steve, its 5487
sorry 4865
scribeNik: is Joshue
SR: The wiki has moved a bit since this issue was created. We should be preparing to vote
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2009Jun/0362.html
<Stevef> josh; this discussion has dragged on, had realization that summary limited but useful, sent email to list about disambiguation of terse and long descriptors and that summary is not
<Stevef> josh: can't act as semantically rich container
<Stevef> josh: still support retention
<Stevef> sam: do you believe wiki accurately represents state of summary issue
<Stevef> josh: yes, but could be improved
<Stevef> sam: can you draft a text to vote on?
<Stevef> josh: yes but want to do it in conjunction with PF
<Stevef> sam: need to get agreement on what we want to vote on
SR: Anything else on @summary?
SF: I've said enough
SR: Ok
TOPIC Issue 54
SR: Julian is not on the
call
... TOPIC 59
MS: The date has been moved. I
don't consider it to yet be at the point where it can be
reviewed.
... I will be working on it today and tomorrow and get it to
the reviews point.
... asap
SR: Ok, as long as you set the new dates in the tracker.
<scribe> ACTION: Joshue to draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/25-html-wg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-128 - Draft @summary voting text in conjunction with PF [on Joshue O Connor - due 2009-07-02].
SR: Action 34 - Overdue
... Action 38 We hope to see movement next week.
... Action 100
<MikeSmith> action-100?
<trackbot> ACTION-100 -- Michael(tm) Smith to add a note about issue-67 to the Status section of "HTML 5: The Markup Language" -- due 2009-05-28 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/100
<MikeSmith> action-103?
<trackbot> ACTION-103 -- Julian Reschke to register about: URI scheme -- due 2009-06-18 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/103
SR: Action 103 awaiting Julians return
<MikeSmith> action-111?
<trackbot> ACTION-111 -- Sam Ruby to send call to working group on summary to update wiki in preparation for vote -- due 2009-06-18 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/111
SR: Action 126 about table summary
<MikeSmith> action-126?
<trackbot> ACTION-126 -- Sam Ruby to send a call to the WG to update the Wiki page to adequately reflect both (all) viewpoints on summary, in prep. for a vote -- due 2009-06-11 -- OPEN
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/126
SR: Anything else?
MS: I have an action to put together a demonstration case for ??.
<rubys> action-115?
<trackbot> ACTION-115 -- Michael(tm) Smith to set up WBS for HTML WG participants to attend HTML WG f2f during TPAC 2009 -- due 2009-05-28 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/actions/115
MS: Registration date..
... That is minimal, only got questions like are you going to
extend or not..
SR: Are you sure its in
tracker?
... I see some thing from the beginning of this month.
... Ok, I'll check with CW and announce it at next meeting
MS: Ok
SF: I have questions about
editing sections of the spec
... I am confused, if I have an issue or wish to provide an
alternative either I can create a copy and modify my section..
then my bit becomes obsolete.
SR: You can produce a fragment etc. They can be merged.
SF: I asked this before, is there a way to have the document as it is being update - the section that I am interested in..can it be independently updated and not changed or overridden by Ians edits?
SR: It is technically possible, don't worry about the final merge.
SF: Is there a point when we say that editing stops while we make desisions?
SR: Ian wants to go to last call
in Oct.. thats not far off
... It should be easy to produce equivalent docs..if someone
else reviews or edits the doc with various parts..this will
come down to a vote
SF: Am concerned about document
integrity
... Mike, can I get access to the repository to create some
sections?
MS: Yes, you can.
SF: I understand more clearly now, thank you
<MikeSmith> Stevef, please e-mail me an SSH2 public key. it can be either DSA or RSA
SF: the other question is that with <canvas>.. what do you think is the best way to get this resolved? If more accessibility stuff doesn't get added to it could it be removed?
SR: Its possible, but
unlikely
... Ian has said that he is committed to accessibility in
canvas so he is motivated also by the upcoming deadline for
CR
... People want <canvas> in and accessibility is a hard
problem.
... Anything else?
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: Joshue Inferring Scribes: Joshue WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Joshue Lachy MS Mike MikeSmith P0 P1 SF SR Sam Stevef billyjackass josh rubys scribeNik trackbot You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 25 Jun 2009 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2009/06/25-html-wg-minutes.html People with action items: joshue WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]