See also: IRC log
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Guide-20090616
SAZ: guide looks good for this publication,
although may need some editorial work
... needs to be done before CR
... key is to have basic concepts and ideas defined clearly
CV: what to finish by end of week, especially section 4
SAZ: CarlosI - input would be useful on these
documents
... no particular editorial issues are significant and they should wait until
publication
... again, content is clear in each document and documents flow well together
as an "EARL framework"
... action for all: pls read and send comments regarding this topic to list
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0025.html
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Guide-20090616#uses
MS: confusion my earlier email regarding two sets
of use cases
... has been clarified
SAZ: how EARL is ultimately defined effects
relation of documents and of RDF schemas
... abstract dubs EARL ias a 'framework'
<shadi> "EARL is a suite of vocabularies"
<shadi> "framework is too broad"
<shadi> "EARL is a vocabulary defined by several specs"
RESOLUTION: EARL is a vocabulary, the terms of which are defined in multiple specifications (e.g. EARL Schema, Representing COntent in RDF, HTTP in RDF, Pointers in RDF)
action for everyone to review documents for which they are responsible in light of this view
<trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - for
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090610
SAZ: RDF has been changed substantially
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0021.html
SAZ: namespace dc will be updated to dct
... outcme value (sec 2.7) have been redefined
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090610#OutcomeValue
SAZ: broken up into classes and related
instances
... more clarification could go in the guide
MS: Fine with sec 2.7
CI: fine with sec 2.7
<scribe> ACTION: Shadi to contact Diego regarding this approach [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/17-er-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-100 - Contact Diego regarding this approach [on Shadi Abou-Zahra - due 2009-06-24].
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Schema-20090610#reports
SAZ: Section 4.1 - conforming reports
did not look at this
+1 for contacting Diego
SAZ: EARL levels of conformance related to view
of EARL as vocabulary defined across multiple specs
... potentially 4 levels, depending upon portions of vocabulary supported
<scribe> ACTION: msquilla to start thread regarding levels of conformance [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/06/17-er-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-101 - Start thread regarding levels of conformance [on Michael Squillace - due 2009-06-24].
UNKNOWN_SPEAKER: MS to look at editors notes 5 and 6
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0036.html
SAZ: CarlosV suggested importing OWL ontology
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/Pointers/WD-Pointers-20090518
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/WD-EARL10-Requirements-20090526
SAZ: should definitely be ready to approve requirements and Pointers in RDF next week for publication
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-er-minutes#item03
JK: some renaming of properties needs to be done
bc only differ in case from a class name
... 'graph' is still a troublesome term as well
... will send updates of both docs later today or tomorrow
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/2009/06/10-er-minutes#item04
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0027.html
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2009Jun/0035.html
JK: added editor's note about dct:source
SAZ: everybody to review EARL Schema, EARL Requirements, and Pointers in RDF
<shadi> this week!
SAZ: updates to HTTP in RDF, Rep Content in RDF, and EARL Guide require review upon update
<shadi> by tuesday!
SAZ: dream is to approve all docs next week