anja: did bosse have time to answer the pharma ontology group questions
... matthias as loaded them into a SPARQL endpoint
... we're now translating the questions into SPARQL
bosse: didn't find the appropriate data for the question that i got from the last call
... will return to this question. some of the answers should be in dbpedia
... will work on questions that come this week from pharma ont
anja: we're trying to link junzhao and kei's datasets
junzhao: i think my question can be rephrased "are their alternatives that interact with a particular set of genes"
... as it stands, we don't have sufficient context
... would be interesting to see chemical compounds shared with western drugs and natural alternatives
... that question is more complex (fuzzy) than the others
anja: queries taking 18hrs/failing
... trying locally
OktieH: these questions aren't in my area of expertise
anja: perhaps you find something related to Linked Clinical Trials
OktieH: concearned about the use cases
<junzhao> do you mean this page? http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/LODD/Business
OktieH: most of them are not use cases for linked data, they are use cases for a web of documents
... the URLs are to HTML pages
<OktieH> Cloud: http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG/LODD/Business
anja: the uses cases in the paper were about finding at alternate drug names and consituant compounds from web pages
bosse: could you [OktieH] write down in the wiki how you'd like the use cases modified?
OktieH: for most of these, we already have linked data for many of these sources
ACTION: OktieH to ground use case (question) pages with links to existing linked data
<OktieH> http://triplify.org/Challenge/2009
<OktieH> The deadline is changed to June 30th
anja: we need a use cases that leans on triples instead of HTML pages
OktieH: yes, that could distinquish us from the other submissions
anja: how important is the schema to the triplification challenge?
OktieH: the thing that helped us get the prize was the metadata
... but this is not new this year
... we should work on factoring our data to finding common schemas
anja: should we use the same schema, or annotate equivalent classes/properties
OktieH: i think it's nice if we use shared ontologies where possible
junzhao: i caution against working too hard on sharing schemas
... prefer to focus on use cases and SPARQL queries
anja: OktieH, please record questions that cross your mind while addressing the use case
OktieH: perhaps folks more familiar with the domain can help with the use cases
... perhaps we should focus on fixing links
... there are some folks working on user ingerfaces which benefit folks more familiar with the domain than linked data concepts
anja: is anyone trying to test their UI witcP> OktieH: doesn't look good for the project
... could use a temporary discussion page before placing in the use case page
ericP: i propose continuing to record the use cases in the wiki page, but annotating each with it's maturity level [ACCEPTED]