00:15:16 <aroben_> aroben_ has joined #webapps
00:16:10 <aroben> aroben has joined #webapps
00:39:29 <MikeSmith> MikeSmith has joined #webapps
00:52:43 <smaug> smaug has joined #webapps
03:26:07 <smaug_> smaug_ has joined #webapps
03:46:08 <Hixie> Hixie has joined #webapps
03:51:35 <Hixie> any chance we can merge http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/webapi/ into http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/ ?
03:59:11 <shepazu> yes, I think that's possible
03:59:28 <shepazu> question is, what to also do with the WAF tracker?
03:59:57 <shepazu> do we want to move them over with exactly the same issue/action numbers, or is the content alone enough?
04:21:09 <Hixie> no idea
07:35:36 <heycam> heycam has joined #webapps
07:57:36 <arve> arve has joined #webapps
08:04:34 <Lachy> Lachy has joined #webapps
08:17:11 <Lachy> Lachy has joined #webapps
08:20:29 <tlr> tlr has joined #webapps
08:58:19 <Lachy> Lachy has joined #webapps
09:55:31 <Lachy> Lachy has joined #webapps
10:26:39 <ArtB> ArtB has joined #webapps
11:00:16 <ArtB> ArtB has changed the topic to: Widgets Voice Conference starts at 13:00 Paris time on June 12
11:00:29 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #webapps
11:00:59 <ArtB> zakim, this will be webapps
11:00:59 <Zakim> ok, ArtB; I see IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM scheduled to start now
11:01:23 <ArtB> hmmm; Marcos, where art thou?
11:03:01 <Zakim> IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM has now started
11:03:08 <marcos_> marcos_ has joined #webapps
11:03:10 <Zakim> + +39.011.228.aaaa
11:03:10 <Zakim> +??P8
11:03:34 <Zakim> +Art_Barstow
11:03:51 <arve> having trouble calling in
11:03:51 <ArtB> zakim, aaaa is Marcos
11:03:51 <Zakim> +Marcos; got it
11:04:01 <Zakim> +Arve
11:04:02 <ArtB> zakim, ??P8 is Claudio
11:04:02 <Zakim> +Claudio; got it
11:05:20 <ArtB> RRSAgent, bye
11:05:20 <RRSAgent> I see 2 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/11-webapps-actions.rdf :
11:05:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: shepazu Continue discussion on list regarding event handler attributes and should they be specified in DOM L3 Events [1]
11:05:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/11-webapps-irc#T19-04-47
11:05:20 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Travis write the list about Error vs DOMException [2]
11:05:20 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/11-webapps-irc#T19-20-39
11:05:39 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #webapps
11:05:39 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc
11:05:55 <ArtB> RRSAgent, make logs Public
11:06:13 <ArtB> Present: Art, Arve, Claudio, Marcos
11:06:16 <ArtB> Chair: Art
11:06:20 <ArtB> ScribeNick: ArtB
11:06:31 <ArtB> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-webapps/2008AprJun/0003.html
11:06:37 <ArtB> Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference
11:06:41 <ArtB> Date: 12 June 2008
11:07:31 <ArtB> Topic: Agenda Review
11:07:39 <ArtB> AB: any change requests?
11:07:41 <ArtB> [None]
11:07:48 <ArtB> Topic: Announcements
11:08:07 <ArtB> AB: transition to WebApps WG is complete
11:08:18 <ArtB> MC: I'm glad this finally happened!
11:08:40 <ArtB> AB: any concerns or issues?
11:08:51 <ArtB> MC: I'm a bit concerned about the volume of email
11:09:04 <ArtB> ... perhaps we should split up the specs into different mail lists
11:09:39 <ArtB> ABe: if you were subscribed to both waf and webapi the change should be zero
11:09:53 <ArtB> MC: agree but I wasn't subscribed to webapi
11:10:05 <ArtB> AB: agree with Marcos concern
11:10:17 <ArtB> ... but would prefer to wait and see
11:10:22 <MikeSmith> Zakim, code?
11:10:22 <Zakim> the conference code is 9231 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), MikeSmith
11:10:31 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
11:10:36 <MikeSmith> Zakim, IP is me
11:10:36 <Zakim> sorry, MikeSmith, I do not recognize a party named 'IP'
11:10:42 <MikeSmith> Zakim, IPcaller is me
11:10:42 <Zakim> +MikeSmith; got it
11:10:42 <ArtB> Present+ Mike
11:11:40 <ArtB> MS: I also have the same concern
11:11:58 <ArtB> ... agree we should take a wait and see for now
11:12:12 <ArtB> ... an extreme is a list per spec
11:12:31 <ArtB> ... but that creates a different set of probs
11:13:07 <claudio> claudio has joined #webapps
11:13:31 <ArtB> CV: I also agree with the mail list issue
11:14:00 <ArtB> ... we are especially interested in Widgets and we do not want to see that disrupted
11:14:29 <ArtB> MS: I can take an action to monitor the lists for one month and then make a recommendation
11:14:59 <ArtB> ACTION: Smith monitor the webapps mail list for one month and then make a recommendation about the number of lists to use
11:14:59 <trackbot> Created ACTION-3 - Monitor the webapps mail list for one month and then make a recommendation about the number of lists to use [on Michael(tm) Smith - due 2008-06-19].
11:16:37 <MikeSmith> ACTION-3 due July 12
11:16:37 <trackbot> ACTION-3 Monitor the webapps mail list for one month and then make a recommendation about the number of lists to use due date now July 12
11:16:54 <ArtB> AB: make sure everyone joins the new WG
11:17:30 <Zakim> -Marcos
11:17:37 <ArtB> MC: what is your status?
11:17:53 <ArtB> s/MC: what/AB: what/
11:18:11 <ArtB> MC: I am working with Mike to become an Invited Expert
11:18:27 <ArtB> AB: I'd be happy to provide input to support this; just let me know
11:18:46 <ArtB> MS: I don't anticipate any probs
11:19:02 <Zakim> +Marcos
11:19:08 <ArtB> Topic: Requirements Last Call
11:19:34 <ArtB> AB: Marcos would like to discuss the Requirements Last Call
11:19:48 <ArtB> MC: the document has mostly settled down
11:19:52 <ArtB> ... few changes recently
11:20:04 <ArtB> ... we've had plenty of internal review
11:20:16 <ArtB> ... want to get more Public review
11:20:28 <ArtB> AB: any comments?
11:20:38 <ArtB> ABe: I think that would be the right move
11:21:10 <ArtB> CV: I agree the doc is ready for LC
11:21:29 <ArtB> MS: I support requesting LC
11:22:01 <ArtB> AB: I have a few editorial requests but I support moving to LC
11:22:51 <ArtB> ... first, I want to say I think this document has been an excellent way for us to communicate the scope and what we are trying to do.
11:23:15 <ArtB> ... the Status of the Doc needs to reflect the change to WebApps WG
11:23:39 <ArtB> MC: yes, I'll make those changes
11:23:47 <marcos_> ACTION: Marcos to update the Requirements document to reflect WebApps WG
11:23:47 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Marcos
11:23:53 <marcos_> ACTION: Caceres to update the Requirements document to reflect WebApps WG
11:23:53 <trackbot> Sorry, couldn't find user - Caceres
11:23:54 <ArtB> AB: there is a related change that needs to be made in Section 2
11:23:59 <marcos_> Ah, not a member yet
11:24:01 <marcos_> :P
11:24:35 <ArtB> AB: one question about paragraph #2 in Section 2
11:24:53 <ArtB> ... can you clarify what is being said
11:25:23 <ArtB> ... <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#conformance>
11:26:39 <ArtB> ArtB has joined #webapps
11:27:48 <ArtB> MC: this is about an input from some company
11:28:15 <ArtB> ... for example an input on security model should be based on one or more of the requirements
11:29:12 <ArtB> AB: I would prefer to delete the second sentence
11:29:20 <ArtB> AB: any other opinions?
11:30:08 <ArtB> AB: based on Marcos' description, I can live with this
11:30:26 <ArtB> MC: OK
11:32:27 <ArtB> CV: I think this sentence says Widgets can be re-specified but if they are, they should reflect these requirements
11:33:11 <ArtB> AB: the doc used to say something like "not all of these reqs will necessarily be specified by the W3C". Is this disclaimer still in there?
11:33:20 <ArtB> MC: yes, by the use of Keywords
11:33:54 <ArtB> MC: I will add a comment
11:34:38 <ArtB> CV: regarding the Abstract, we are a bit weak regarding device capabilities
11:34:54 <ArtB> ... req #29 is the only related requirement
11:35:19 <ArtB> MC: good point
11:35:35 <ArtB> AB: what do you think we should do?
11:35:43 <ArtB> ... or was this more of an observation?
11:35:57 <ArtB> CV: we could add a pointer to the UWA WG's work
11:36:21 <ArtB> MC: but we don't want create any device API specs
11:37:12 <ArtB> AB: does the Rational of req 29 address your concern?
11:38:13 <ArtB> CV: yes, now that I read the Rational I think that addresses the issue
11:38:36 <ArtB> MC: and I can remove some of the device-specific use cases/examples from the Abstract
11:39:23 <ArtB> MC: I prefer to leave the text as is
11:40:51 <ArtB> ABe: the reality is widgets will have to deal with vendor-specific and device-specifc APIs
11:41:01 <ArtB> ... but I don't think doing such is in our scope
11:41:15 <ArtB> ... it could be some abstract bindings would be helpful
11:41:47 <ArtB> MC: need a generic means to tie into device and vendor specific APIs
11:42:31 <ArtB> ABe: we could then refer to them as "3rd-party" APIs
11:42:47 <ArtB> AB: are you going to do a major rework of #29?
11:42:50 <ArtB> MC: yes
11:45:00 <ArtB> AB: I would like to give the WG a 1-week review period
11:45:26 <ArtB> ... if we want to target June 19 as the Decision Day, we would need a revised version within the next day or so
11:45:34 <ArtB> ... Marcos, is that doable?
11:45:36 <ArtB> MC: yes
11:46:39 <ArtB> AB: working assumption: Marcos will make his changes and then notify the WG that we want to make a decsion on June 19 regarding LC so WG members should submit any comments by June 18 at the latest
11:46:53 <ArtB> AB: any objections?
11:47:04 <ArtB> [None]
11:47:51 <ArtB> Topic: User Agent Conformance
11:48:02 <ArtB> AB: comments from FT's Fabrice
11:48:21 <ArtB> MC: I've answered that
11:48:27 <ArtB> Topic: Turin F2F
11:49:09 <ArtB> CV: I will miss the next couple of calls
11:49:17 <ArtB> ... all of the arrangements are made
11:50:12 <ArtB> ... in mid to late July I will send out some hotel info
11:50:31 <ArtB> AB: the hotel info would be good to get earlier
11:50:51 <ArtB> ABe: yes, I also would like to get the hotel info earlier
11:51:07 <ArtB> CV: Turin usually is not that busy in August
11:51:56 <ArtB> CV: I will try to send something by the end of today
11:52:47 <ArtB> AB: you have some comments on the format?
11:53:06 <ArtB> MC: want to be in a position to close issues
11:53:37 <ArtB> ... so we can be in a position to get to LC in October
11:53:53 <ArtB> ABe: could be helpful to spit into groups for the editorial type stuff
11:54:14 <ArtB> MC: in small groups we could also do some implementations
11:54:19 <ArtB> ... I've found that useful
11:54:54 <ArtB> AB: agree, but not sure the people that attend the meeting have the right skill set for implementations
11:55:26 <ArtB> s/the people/that some of the people/
11:55:58 <ArtB> ABe: we could set up an implemenation area on the W3C's CVS repository
11:56:08 <ArtB> CV: we are trying to implement something
11:56:28 <ArtB> ... perhaps we can get those people involved
11:56:46 <ArtB> MC: we could have some people doing Editorial work and some doing Impl work
11:57:09 <ArtB> MC: I can do some research on how to most effectively make use of people's time
11:57:26 <ArtB> ... I thought Hixie's un-conf approach for HTML went well
11:57:37 <ArtB> ... (at the TPAC in November 2007)
11:58:51 <ArtB> ACTION: Barstow work with Marcos et al. on the Turin agenda that maximizes the use of people's time
11:58:51 <trackbot> Created ACTION-4 - Work with Marcos et al. on the Turin agenda that maximizes the use of people's time [on Arthur Barstow - due 2008-06-19].
11:59:25 <Zakim> -Art_Barstow
11:59:26 <Zakim> -Arve
11:59:26 <Zakim> -Claudio
11:59:27 <Zakim> -Marcos
11:59:34 <Zakim> -MikeSmith
11:59:35 <ArtB> RRSAgent, make minutes
11:59:35 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-minutes.html ArtB
11:59:36 <Zakim> IA_WebApps(Widgets)7:00AM has ended
11:59:37 <Zakim> Attendees were +39.011.228.aaaa, Art_Barstow, Marcos, Arve, Claudio, MikeSmith
12:01:25 <ArtB> AB: Meeting adjourned
12:01:31 <ArtB> RRSAgent, make minutes
12:01:33 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-minutes.html ArtB
12:02:03 <ArtB> RRSAgent, bye
12:02:03 <RRSAgent> I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-actions.rdf :
12:02:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Smith monitor the webapps mail list for one month and then make a recommendation about the number of lists to use [1]
12:02:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc#T11-14-59
12:02:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Marcos to update the Requirements document to reflect WebApps WG [2]
12:02:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc#T11-23-47
12:02:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Caceres to update the Requirements document to reflect WebApps WG [3]
12:02:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc#T11-23-53
12:02:03 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Barstow work with Marcos et al. on the Turin agenda that maximizes the use of people's time [4]
12:02:03 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-webapps-irc#T11-58-51