IRC log of rdfa on 2008-06-12
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:02:19 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #rdfa
- 15:02:19 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc
- 15:02:35 [ShaneM]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:02:35 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see +1.763.767.aaaa
- 15:02:37 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, Zakim, Steven, msporny, ShaneM
- 15:02:44 [ShaneM]
- zakim, aaaa is ShaneM
- 15:02:44 [Zakim]
- +ShaneM; got it
- 15:03:26 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:03:31 [benadida]
- benadida has joined #rdfa
- 15:03:34 [msporny]
- zakim, I am +[IPcaller]
- 15:03:38 [Zakim]
- sorry, msporny, I do not see a party named '+[IPcaller]'
- 15:03:53 [msporny]
- zakim, I am IPcaller
- 15:03:53 [Zakim]
- ok, msporny, I now associate you with [IPcaller]
- 15:04:02 [Zakim]
- +Ben_Adida
- 15:04:56 [msporny]
- Scribe: Manu Sporny
- 15:05:04 [msporny]
- ScribeNick: msporny
- 15:05:16 [msporny]
- Meeting: RDF in XHTML Task Force
- 15:05:24 [msporny]
- Chair: Ben Adida
- 15:05:25 [RalphS]
- RalphS has joined #rdfa
- 15:05:36 [msporny]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 15:05:48 [msporny]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:05:48 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
- 15:05:58 [Zakim]
- +Ralph
- 15:06:52 [msporny]
- Regrets: Mark Birbeck, Michael Hausenblas
- 15:07:51 [RalphS]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0065.html
- 15:07:52 [msporny]
- ShaneM: Quick update on Modularization
- 15:07:59 [RalphS]
- Topic: XHTML Modularization
- 15:08:06 [msporny]
- ShaneM: should go to PR today
- 15:08:20 [msporny]
- ShaneM: Modularization 1.1 includes a schema implementation, we shouldn't change our doc yet.
- 15:08:36 [msporny]
- ShaneM: We should announce this on rdfa.info
- 15:09:38 [benadida]
- Regrets: Mark, Michael
- 15:09:48 [msporny]
- Topic: Action Items
- 15:10:24 [RalphS]
- [DONE] ACTION: Manu complete test suite [by Thursday 12 June] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action07]
- 15:10:52 [RalphS]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes previous 2008-06-05
- 15:11:03 [msporny]
- ACTION: Mark to tweak paragraph 3.9 of the spec on fragments. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action09]
- 15:11:06 [msporny]
- -- DONE
- 15:11:14 [msporny]
- ACTION: Ralph confirm whether LGPL is ok with W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action03]
- 15:11:16 [msporny]
- -- CONTINUES
- 15:12:12 [msporny]
- ACTION: Ralph to help Ben with Last Call Comment report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action08]
- 15:12:20 [msporny]
- -- CONTINUES
- 15:12:33 [msporny]
- ACTION: Shane produce a CR-ready draft for SWD and XHTML2 WGs to approve [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action10]
- 15:12:38 [msporny]
- -- DONE
- 15:13:06 [msporny]
- ACTION: Ben followup with Fabien on getting his RDFa GRDDL transform transferred to W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action01]
- 15:13:12 [msporny]
- -- CONTINUES
- 15:13:19 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu to reach out to Slashdot and attempt to get RDFa integrated into Slashdot. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/08-rdfa-minutes.html#action10]
- 15:13:24 [msporny]
- -- CONTINUES
- 15:13:29 [msporny]
- ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes.html#action12]
- 15:13:34 [msporny]
- -- CONTINUES
- 15:13:40 [msporny]
- ACTION: Manu to determine which useless-triples test cases to remove and which to add. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/08-rdfa-minutes.html#action12]
- 15:13:43 [msporny]
- -- CONTINUES
- 15:13:48 [msporny]
- -- DONE
- 15:14:05 [msporny]
- Topic: Test Cases
- 15:14:25 [msporny]
- http://rdfa.digitalbazaar.com/rdfa-test-harness/
- 15:14:27 [RalphS]
- scribenick: RalphS
- 15:15:03 [RalphS]
- Manu: test 107, 108, and 109 were already in the suite but hadn't been committed
- 15:15:11 [RalphS]
- ... so I sent duplicate numbers in recent email
- 15:15:23 [RalphS]
- -- Test #107: no garbage collecting bnodes
- 15:15:57 [RalphS]
- Manu: 107, 108, 109, 110, and 111 all pass 3 of the implementations
- 15:16:24 [RalphS]
- .. 107 sets up the multiple bnode [not] garbage collecting
- 15:16:46 [RalphS]
- ... 107 checks that there is no bnode created by this hanging @rel
- 15:17:09 [ShaneM]
- Seems fine
- 15:17:32 [RalphS]
- RESOLVED: test 107 accepted
- 15:17:49 [RalphS]
- -- Test #108: plain literal with datatype="" and xml:lang preservation
- 15:17:59 [RalphS]
- Manu: I believe we had accepted this but I could not find a record
- 15:18:16 [RalphS]
- ... 108 tests that lang is preserved
- 15:18:50 [RalphS]
- ... we had previously decided not to test whitespace preservation
- 15:19:01 [RalphS]
- ... but this test does also include whitespace preservation
- 15:19:08 [RalphS]
- ... I don't think it hurts
- 15:19:29 [RalphS]
- Ralph: we should not change it to the alternative; collapsed whitespace
- 15:19:35 [RalphS]
- Manu: also uses UTF-8 string
- 15:20:01 [RalphS]
- Shane: I noted that the N-triples spec requires escaping of Unicode
- 15:20:16 [RalphS]
- Ben: N-triples and N3 are parsed differently
- 15:21:25 [RalphS]
- RESOLVED: test 108 accepted
- 15:21:39 [RalphS]
- -- Test #109: Tests to ensure @xml:base is ignored
- 15:21:50 [RalphS]
- Manu: 109 was on hold because it's not valid XHTML
- 15:22:04 [RalphS]
- ... because it uses xml:base
- 15:22:11 [RalphS]
- ... it is well-formed, however
- 15:22:28 [RalphS]
- Ben: I think it's OK to have a test like this; people will add non-XHTML attributes
- 15:23:08 [RalphS]
- Ralph: can we move the comment to preceed HEAD?
- 15:23:11 [ShaneM]
- looks fine
- 15:23:38 [RalphS]
- Ralph: forget it; the comment is in the right place
- 15:23:48 [RalphS]
- RESOLVED: test 109 accepted
- 15:24:17 [RalphS]
- -- Test #110: bNode generated even though no nested @about exists
- 15:24:31 [RalphS]
- Manu: inner DIV causes the object for the containing DIV to be completed with a bnode
- 15:24:42 [RalphS]
- ... we're testing that only one bnode is generated
- 15:25:06 [RalphS]
- Ben: is there no way to test that a second triple is absent?
- 15:25:26 [RalphS]
- ... I don't really think we need to add such a test; 107 is sufficient
- 15:26:08 [RalphS]
- Manu: we've stated no extra triples should be generated in the default graph but the tests will pass if there are extra triples
- 15:26:13 [RalphS]
- Ben: except for the negative tests
- 15:26:21 [ShaneM]
- +1
- 15:26:23 [RalphS]
- RESOLVED: test 110 accepted
- 15:26:45 [RalphS]
- -- Test #111: two bNodes generated after three levels of nesting
- 15:27:04 [RalphS]
- Manu: 111 is another like 110; here, we do generate 2 related bnodes
- 15:27:27 [ShaneM]
- +1
- 15:27:43 [RalphS]
- RESOLVED: test 111 accepted
- 15:27:47 [ShaneM]
- and XHTML M12N PR is up!
- 15:27:53 [RalphS]
- -- Test @@
- 15:27:55 [msporny]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/OLD_0107.xhtml
- 15:28:08 [msporny]
- http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/testsuite/xhtml1-testcases/OLD_0107.sparql
- 15:28:09 [RalphS]
- Manu: rename this to test 112
- 15:28:41 [RalphS]
- ... like 108 but doesn't use Greek
- 15:29:14 [RalphS]
- RESOLVED: (new) test 112 accepted
- 15:29:20 [ShaneM]
- huzzah!
- 15:31:59 [msporny]
- ScribeNick: msporny
- 15:32:00 [RalphS]
- Ralph: can we host the test harness on w3.org now or is that going to be too inconvenient for you, Manu?
- 15:32:10 [RalphS]
- scribenick: ralphs
- 15:32:15 [msporny]
- :)
- 15:32:21 [RalphS]
- Manu: should be ok to move now. I'll make you some instructions
- 15:32:25 [RalphS]
- ... only uses python
- 15:32:55 [RalphS]
- Ralph: ok. If it's easy, I think we should host it at w3.org just to deflect possible questions
- 15:33:05 [RalphS]
- scribenick: msporny
- 15:34:37 [RalphS]
- Topic: Disposition of Comments
- 15:34:47 [RalphS]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/last-call-issues RDFa in XHTML 1.1 Last Call Disposition of Comments
- 15:35:12 [msporny]
- benadida: This URL is an XSLT of the datadump
- 15:35:27 [msporny]
- benadida: I'll have to go through and clean it up
- 15:35:53 [msporny]
- benadida: all issues are closed
- 15:35:59 [msporny]
- benadida: Except for TimBL's comments.
- 15:36:07 [msporny]
- benadida: everyone has responded positively
- 15:36:08 [ShaneM]
- nice.
- 15:36:26 [msporny]
- benadida: Is this pretty much done Ralph?
- 15:36:40 [msporny]
- RalphS: More or less.
- 15:36:46 [msporny]
- benadida: It'll be cleaned up, ofcourse.
- 15:37:20 [ShaneM]
- fwiw the xhtml 2 working group doesn't ever clean up the data
- 15:37:38 [ShaneM]
- we just put in a caveat that the issues might have typos and they belong to the submitters
- 15:37:49 [msporny]
- benadida: Is it important to see what the commenter said and whether we agree with it or not?
- 15:38:04 [msporny]
- RalphS: we need to record that somehow, yes.
- 15:38:44 [msporny]
- benadida: We should make it contain RDFa.
- 15:38:54 [ShaneM]
- about="tracker issue URI"
- 15:39:02 [msporny]
- benadida: What's the process for scheduling with Steve?
- 15:39:04 [ShaneM]
- has the SWD approved the CR transition
- 15:39:10 [msporny]
- RalphS: I'll notify him.
- 15:39:25 [msporny]
- benadida: This should be done by Monday night.
- 15:39:35 [benadida]
- http://ben.adida.net/busy/
- 15:39:36 [ShaneM]
- s/Monday/Sunday/
- 15:40:32 [msporny]
- RalphS: hopefully we'll hear back from Tim before then.
- 15:41:04 [msporny]
- RalphS: Is the primer completely done?
- 15:41:10 [msporny]
- benadida: It didn't get voted on did it?
- 15:41:13 [msporny]
- RalphS: It did get voted on.
- 15:41:21 [msporny]
- benadida: I would like to do one last pass for typos.
- 15:41:28 [msporny]
- RalphS: Typos shouldn't be an issue.
- 15:41:36 [msporny]
- benadida: Nothing significant is going to change.
- 15:41:41 [Steven]
- regrets+Steven
- 15:41:41 [msporny]
- RalphS: We don't need it for the transition call.
- 15:41:51 [msporny]
- RalphS: We're trying to get both documents in the publication request.
- 15:41:58 [msporny]
- benadida: I'll make a pass by Mon/Tues at the latest.
- 15:42:06 [Zakim]
- -ShaneM
- 15:42:07 [Zakim]
- -Ben_Adida
- 15:42:08 [Zakim]
- -[IPcaller]
- 15:42:08 [Zakim]
- -Ralph
- 15:42:10 [Zakim]
- SW_SWD(RDFa)11:00AM has ended
- 15:42:11 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.763.767.aaaa, ShaneM, [IPcaller], Ben_Adida, Ralph
- 15:42:32 [msporny]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:42:32 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-minutes.html msporny
- 15:44:25 [msporny]
- If you want and have the time.
- 15:44:33 [msporny]
- I can clean them up if you're pressed for time.
- 15:44:52 [msporny]
- alrighty, sounds good... I'll leave that to you, then :)
- 15:45:02 [msporny]
- thanks Ralph :)
- 15:45:06 [RalphS]
- just as easy for me to do it as to copy it back from you :)
- 15:45:11 [msporny]
- heh
- 15:45:11 [RalphS]
- thanks to you!
- 15:45:19 [RalphS]
- rrsagent, bye
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- I see 8 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-actions.rdf :
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Mark to tweak paragraph 3.9 of the spec on fragments. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action09] [1]
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc#T15-11-03
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph confirm whether LGPL is ok with W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action03] [2]
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc#T15-11-14
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ralph to help Ben with Last Call Comment report [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action08] [3]
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc#T15-12-12
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Shane produce a CR-ready draft for SWD and XHTML2 WGs to approve [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/05-rdfa-minutes.html#action10] [4]
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc#T15-12-33
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Ben followup with Fabien on getting his RDFa GRDDL transform transferred to W3C [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/11/15-rdfa-minutes.html#action01] [5]
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc#T15-13-06
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to reach out to Slashdot and attempt to get RDFa integrated into Slashdot. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/08-rdfa-minutes.html#action10] [6]
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc#T15-13-19
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Michael to create 'RDFa for uF users' on RDFa Wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/03/13-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [7]
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc#T15-13-29
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Manu to determine which useless-triples test cases to remove and which to add. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/08-rdfa-minutes.html#action12] [8]
- 15:45:19 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/06/12-rdfa-irc#T15-13-40
- 15:45:24 [msporny]
- have a good weekend!