18:59:39 RRSAgent has joined #sml 18:59:39 logging to http://www.w3.org/2008/03/06-sml-irc 18:59:40 Kirk has joined #sml 19:00:19 Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Mar/0018.html 19:00:24 Sandy has joined #sml 19:00:41 Scribe: Jordan Boucher 19:00:45 ScribeNick: Jordan 19:00:49 Valentina has joined #sml 19:01:09 Meeting: SML WG Weekly Teleconf 19:01:15 Chair: Pratul 19:01:21 zakim, this will be sml 19:01:21 ok, Sandy, I see XML_SMLWG()2:00PM already started 19:01:43 Zakim, Microsoft is me 19:01:43 +pratul; got it 19:02:10 + +1.905.413.aaee 19:02:26 zakim, aaee is me 19:02:26 +Valentina; got it 19:02:44 zakim, aabb is me 19:02:44 +Jordan; got it 19:02:54 zakim, aacc is me 19:02:54 +Jim; got it 19:03:53 Regrets: Ginnny 19:04:01 s/Ginnny/Ginny/ 19:04:19 Topic: Approval of past minutes 19:04:44 Kirk has joined #sml 19:04:46 Resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Mar/att-0001/2008-01-21-sml-minutes.html approved 19:05:09 Resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Feb/att-0257/20080122-sml-minutes.html approved 19:05:41 Resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Feb/att-0264/2008-02-21-minutes.htm approved 19:05:58 Topic: F2F Meetings 19:06:10 johnarwe has joined #sml 19:06:22 zakim, please call MSM-617 19:06:23 ok, MSM; the call is being made 19:06:24 +MSM 19:06:46 + +1.845.433.aaff 19:06:53 zakim, aaff is me 19:06:53 +johnarwe; got it 19:09:41 Pratul: please register for Redwood Shores F2F 19:10:04 Pratul: are there any objections to June F2F in Edinburgh? 19:10:11 no objections noted 19:12:02 +[Microsoft] 19:12:34 zakim, +[Microsoft] is kumar 19:12:37 sorry, johnarwe, I do not recognize a party named '+[Microsoft]' 19:12:53 zakim, who's on the phone? 19:12:53 On the phone I see +1.828.645.aaaa, pratul, Jordan, Jim, +1.603.823.aadd, Sandy, Valentina, MSM, johnarwe, [Microsoft] 19:13:10 zakim, [Microsoft] is kumar 19:13:10 +kumar; got it 19:13:38 zulah has joined #sml 19:13:43 http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/06/edinburgh-meetings-info.html 19:13:53 http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2008/06/edinburgh-meetings-info.html 19:13:56 Kumar has joined #sml 19:14:29 from Logistics: Hotels 19:14:29 19:14:29 Edinburgh has a huge range of hotels, you're best bet for finding one is to use the Web. If you're stuck and can't choose between a few options, let me know and I'll give you my best guess. 19:14:48 Topic: Overdue Actions 19:15:21 The meeting space is on or near Buccleuch Place, if that helps. Or just look for the University. 19:15:22 Pratul: have not touched my two 19:16:02 John: willing to close 110, if others agree 19:16:10 +Zulah_Eckert 19:16:11 Pratul: +1 19:16:18 Resolution: close 110 19:17:43 Topic: Bugs 19:18:29 zakim, who's here? 19:18:29 On the phone I see +1.828.645.aaaa, pratul, Jordan, Jim, +1.603.823.aadd, Sandy, Valentina, MSM, johnarwe, kumar, Zulah_Eckert 19:18:32 On IRC I see Kumar, zulah, johnarwe, Kirk, Valentina, Sandy, RRSAgent, Jordan, Zakim, pratul, Jim, MSM, trackbot-ng 19:18:40 zakim, unmute Valentina 19:18:40 Valentina was not muted, MSM 19:19:26 welcome, Julia 19:20:16 Pratul: thanks to Valentina for her tremendous service to the group 19:26:45 Resolution: Kirk to send note to SML WG for review, if no major comments are made it will be OK for John to send to the TAG 19:27:25 ... comments are made by EOD tomorrow, 3/7/08 19:27:39 s/made/due/ 19:27:57 Topic: Review Bugs (for real this time) 19:28:09 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5505 19:29:06 Pratul: mark as editorial and fix it, if no objections 19:31:01 Resolution: add a comment to clarify that aliases are for documents, mark it editorial and fixed per comment #1 19:32:00 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5506 19:34:51 Pratul: any objections? 19:35:44 EPR TAG NOTE is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2008Mar/0029.html 19:36:03 Resolution: mark as editorial and fix it 19:36:19 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5513 19:37:45 Sandy: perhaps further study of XLink is needed for a complete response? 19:38:11 ACTION: Kumar to study XLink and respond to 5513 19:38:12 Created ACTION-171 - Study XLink and respond to 5513 [on Kumar Pandit - due 2008-03-13]. 19:38:26 s/NOTE is/NOTE DRAFT is/ 19:39:49 MSM: will review Kumar's effort on 5513 19:40:08 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5518 19:40:40 When we move people's comments from mail into bugzilla, we need to make sure we add the originator to the cc list on the bug. 19:43:07 ACTION: Pratul will follow up with Henry and report back to group 19:43:07 Created ACTION-172 - Will follow up with Henry and report back to group [on Pratul Dublish - due 2008-03-13]. 19:45:22 [N.B. there is also a potential administrative tangle: I believe that Bugzilla will only cc: people registered as Bugzilla users. For Henry's case, that's OK, I believe he's registered. But if it becomes an issue, I can add people as registered users -- so if adding someone as a CC value leads to problems, whoever is doing the work should contact me to deal with the problem.] 19:46:59 ACTION: MSM to add users to Bugzilla as needed 19:46:59 Created ACTION-173 - Add users to Bugzilla as needed [on Michael Sperberg-McQueen - due 2008-03-13]. 19:49:47 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5519 19:53:55 ACTION: Pratul to explain to Henry how SML handles the cases and see what he thinks 19:53:55 Created ACTION-174 - Explain to Henry how SML handles the cases and see what he thinks [on Pratul Dublish - due 2008-03-13]. 19:54:48 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5520 19:55:17 Document 19:55:18 A well-formed XML document, as defined in [XML]. 19:57:36 zakim, who's on the phone 19:57:36 I don't understand 'who's on the phone', johnarwe 19:57:48 zakim, who's on the phone? 19:57:48 On the phone I see +1.828.645.aaaa, pratul, Jordan, Jim, +1.603.823.aadd, Sandy, Valentina, MSM, johnarwe, kumar, Zulah_Eckert 19:59:46 zakim, aaaa is Julia 19:59:46 +Julia; got it 20:01:38 MSM to send email to Pratul, who will edit/send to Henry 20:01:58 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5521 20:03:10 Pratul: appears to be fixed in LC 20:04:04 http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5298 20:04:05 John: see a related bug for CR, 5298 20:05:21 Resolution: 5521 is a dup of 5298 20:05:44 ... cc Henry as well 20:05:58 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5522 20:06:13 zakim, aadd is Kirk 20:06:13 +Kirk; got it 20:08:24 John: propose asking submitter if the LC fix satisfies the issue 20:10:04 Resolution: put in wording from LC, mark as fixed, comment further if not satisfied 20:10:21 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5523 20:18:55 bullet 2.b in 4.3.1: "If it does not retrieve a document in the current model, the SML reference scheme instance is unresolved." 20:22:12 Sandy: suggests a non-normative note as well 20:23:05 ACTION: Kumar to formulate proposal for bug 5523 20:23:05 Created ACTION-175 - Formulate proposal for bug 5523 [on Kumar Pandit - due 2008-03-13]. 20:23:21 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5524 20:26:04 Sandy: does not think the bug proposal is accurate, but OK with another title 20:28:04 MSM: agrees with Sandy 20:28:43 ... proposes "not a valid bug" 20:28:47 I agree with Sandy 20:29:35 Resolution: we believe the current title is correct, close bug as invalid 20:29:58 The attributes and elements on which these mappings rely are present not only in schema documents but also in schemas (in the relevant annotation properties), so we believe the current title is correct. 20:30:27 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5525 20:32:21 MSM: agrees with spirit of complaint, but not the proposed title 20:32:38 Maybe "Schema component rule" would be better 20:32:40 ... perhaps "Schema component rule" 20:32:56 Sounds good 20:32:58 Or just "Schema rule" 20:33:45 zakim, who's noisy? 20:33:55 MSM, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: pratul (54%), johnarwe (5%) 20:35:15 [I agree with SG that having parallel names for rules about schemas and rules about instances -- so maybe also find a new name for current "instance validity" rule? But in SML terms, the rules about instances ARE validity rules ...] 20:35:34 zulah has joined #sml 20:35:48 s/that having/that it's a good idea to have/ 20:38:48 Resolution: fix as suggested above by MSM, mark needsReview 20:39:02 s/needsReview/hasProposal/ 20:41:53 MSM: give outside reviewers two weeks to respond to work group proposals 20:44:00 The SML WG believes that the changes adopted today resolve this issue fully. I'm changing its status accordingly. 20:44:00 20:44:00 The change in status should cause email to be sent to the originator of this issue, to whom the following request is addressed. 20:44:00 20:44:03 Please review the changes adopted and let us know if you agree with this resolution of your issue, by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of the issue to Closed. Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to 20:44:07 appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the record to Closed. If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, we will assume you agree with the WG decision. 20:44:56 (preceding is text xml schema uses for responding to bugs, that sml is considering re-using) 20:45:53 Pratul: any objections to using this text? 20:45:58 Resolution: make it so 20:46:57 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5526 20:47:38 John: the original intent was to not place arbitrary restrictions on depth 20:48:26 Kumar: believes it is clear, but perhaps we could explain more 20:49:15 Perhaps s/nested to any depth/with function calls nested to any depth/ ? 20:49:54 Kumar: agrees with MSM change 20:50:36 Resolution: fix as suggested by MSM, mark hasProposal 20:50:45 Topic: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5527 20:59:59 [As a data point, to answer a question Pratul raised: yes, use of an unprefixed name for an extension function is not legal in Xpath 1.0. Or so I read Michael Kay's book] 21:04:17 -johnarwe 21:04:19 -Sandy 21:04:20 -pratul 21:04:21 -Valentina 21:04:22 -Julia 21:04:23 -Zulah_Eckert 21:04:23 -Kirk 21:04:30 Resolution: mark needsAgreement 21:04:44 -Jim 21:04:46 -kumar 21:04:48 rrsagent, make log public 21:04:50 Jim has left #sml 21:04:57 -MSM 21:05:21 -Jordan 21:05:22 XML_SMLWG()2:00PM has ended 21:05:23 Attendees were +1.828.645.aaaa, +1.303.495.aabb, +1.610.277.aacc, +1.603.823.aadd, Sandy, pratul, +1.905.413.aaee, Valentina, Jordan, Jim, MSM, +1.845.433.aaff, johnarwe, kumar, 21:05:25 ... Zulah_Eckert, Julia, Kirk 21:05:41 rrsagent, draft minutes 21:05:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2008/03/06-sml-minutes.html Jordan 21:05:54 johnarwe has left #sml 21:12:02 zakim, who's here? 21:12:02 apparently XML_SMLWG()2:00PM has ended, Jordan 21:12:03 On IRC I see zulah, Kumar, Sandy, RRSAgent, Jordan, Zakim, pratul, MSM, trackbot-ng 23:14:54 Zakim has left #sml