21:03:39 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #sml
21:03:39 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/12/03-sml-irc
21:04:16 <pratul> Agenda http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Dec/0002.html
21:04:44 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #sml
21:05:50 <johnarwe> scribe: Kumar
21:06:07 <johnarwe> zakim, who's here?
21:06:07 <Zakim> sorry, johnarwe, I don't know what conference this is
21:06:08 <Zakim> On IRC I see RRSAgent, johnarwe, pratul, Jordan, MSM, ginny, Kumar, Kirk, trackbot-ng
21:06:15 <johnarwe> zakim, this is SML
21:06:17 <Zakim> ok, johnarwe; that matches XML_SMLWG()4:00PM
21:06:41 <Kumar> scribenick: Kumar
21:07:09 <Kumar> Meeting: SML WG Conf Call on Monday
21:07:20 <Kumar> chair: Pratul
21:07:47 <Kumar> topic: Approval of minutes from previous meeting
21:08:11 <Kumar> Pratul: is there any objection to the minutes?
21:08:16 <Kumar> no objections heard.
21:08:32 <Kumar> Pratul: minutes are approved
21:08:50 <Kumar> Pratul: W3C has deadline for publication on 12/21/2007
21:09:35 <Kumar> Pratul: given that it takes about 5 days for the webmaster to go through the publication process, we should have goal to send the LC draft to webmaster by 12/14
21:10:35 <Kumar> Pratul: LC does not mean that no further discussions are possible. It only means that the WG has no more open issues. New issues can be brought up by the community.
21:11:06 <Kumar> topic: Review and attempt consensus on the following needsReview bugs
21:12:09 <Kumar> topic: bug# 4675
21:14:39 <Kumar> ginny: I have second thoughts on the the 2 levels of compliance. I changed my mind and I believe there should only be a single level. This is better for compliance.
21:18:31 <Kumar> Pratul: Zulah has asked to defer the discussion on EPR scheme and the compliance level bug.
21:19:29 <Kumar> Kumar: ginny, can you add a specific proposal for 4675?
21:19:35 <Kumar> ginny: yes
21:22:37 <Kumar> topic: bug# 4687
21:23:15 <Kumar> Pratul: any objections to the changes to 4687?
21:23:35 <Kumar> Pratul: no objections heard. Mark it as fixed
21:23:47 <Kumar> topic: bug# 4770
21:25:27 <Kumar> Pratul: any objections?
21:25:37 <Kumar> Pratul: no objections heard. Please mark as fixed.
21:25:44 <Kumar> topic: bug# 4992
21:30:05 <Kumar> Kirk: Is the sentence "Whether new schemes satisfy these conditions will be
21:30:05 <Kumar> clear from their scheme definitions." clear enough? I think we should change it to something more specific/positive.
21:30:14 <ginny> Fix per comment #12 to include rewording of last sentence in bullet #1 to state that scheme authors should specify whether the scheme satisfies condition a and b.
21:30:53 <Kumar> Pratul: Agreed. Are there objections to other changes?
21:31:00 <Kumar> Pratul: no objection heard.
21:31:21 <Kumar> ginny: I will mark it back as editorial.
21:32:12 <Kumar> topic: bug# 5106
21:32:51 <Kumar> Pratul: Zulah wants to discuss EPR scheme. We should defer the discussion to Thu call.
21:33:24 <Kumar> topic: bug# 5291
21:45:31 <Kumar> Kumar: I am not sure why we need to add this text. Consistency of ref schemes is only relevant in the context of reference resolution. The text to be added is already covered under reference resolution.
21:52:33 <Kumar> Kumar: at least we should change the section title to reflect the fact that the section is about comparing ref targets. This could be done as a part of the bug# 4992
21:52:40 <Kumar> topic: bug# 5294
21:53:38 <Kumar> Pratul: This is about adding a comment to the schema. Any objections?
21:54:32 <Kumar> Pratul: No objections heard. Resolve as fixed.
21:55:53 <ginny> s/fixed/editorial/
21:55:53 <Kumar> Kumar: One question about changes for bug# 5291. There used to be a section that described the steps involved in reference resolution. This section seems to have been removed. This section should be put back.
21:56:25 <Kumar> Kumar: I will open a bug for this.
21:56:35 <Zakim> -[Microsoft.a]
21:56:37 <Zakim> - +1.530.823.aaaa
21:56:40 <Zakim> - +1.603.823.aabb
21:56:53 <Zakim> -??P9
21:56:55 <Kumar> Pratul: Let us continue the discussion on Thu. We should try to get closure on all issues at that time.
21:57:01 <Zakim> -[Microsoft]
21:57:06 <Kumar> rrsagent, generate minutes
21:57:06 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/12/03-sml-minutes.html Kumar
21:57:17 <Zakim> -Jordan
21:57:19 <Zakim> XML_SMLWG()4:00PM has ended
21:57:20 <Zakim> Attendees were [Microsoft], ginny, Kirk, Jordan
21:57:31 <Kumar> rrsagent, make log public
21:57:46 <johnarwe> johnarwe has left #sml
21:59:08 <Kumar> rrsagent, bye
21:59:08 <RRSAgent> I see no action items