21:02:34 RRSAgent has joined #sml 21:02:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/11/12-sml-irc 21:03:06 Zakim, Microsoft is me 21:03:06 +pratul; got it 21:03:32 Zakim, Microsoft is Kumar 21:03:32 sorry, pratul, I do not recognize a party named 'Microsoft' 21:03:33 +Jordan 21:03:34 zakim, ??p2 is me 21:03:35 +johnarwe; got it 21:03:55 zakim, Ed_Rice is me 21:03:55 +ginny; got it 21:04:23 zakim, pratul has Kumar 21:04:23 +Kumar; got it 21:04:36 zakim, who is here 21:04:36 ginny, you need to end that query with '?' 21:04:51 zakim, who is here? 21:04:51 On the phone I see ginny, Kirk, johnarwe, pratul, Sandy, Valentina, Jordan 21:04:53 pratul has Kumar 21:04:54 On IRC I see RRSAgent, johnarwe, Valentina, Kumar, pratul, Kirk, Zakim, ginny, Sandy, trackbot-ng 21:04:58 scribe: Kirk Wilson 21:05:00 Jordan has joined #sml 21:05:10 scribenick: Kirk 21:06:28 Pratul: Intel has withdrawn for the group 21:06:48 Topic: Approval of minutes 21:07:21 No comments on minutes 10/15. Minutes for 10/15 approved. 21:07:40 No comments on minutes 11/1. Minutes for 11/1 approved. 21:09:21 After discussion of status of minutes 11/8. No comments on minutes for 11/8. Minutes for 11/8 approved. 21:09:30 Topic: Action Items 21:10:58 John: Will close 148. 21:11:46 Sandy: 120 is superseding by discussion last week. Issue to be closed. 21:12:09 Sandy: 142 still working on it. 21:12:52 Sandy: Will close 149 21:13:40 s/superseding/superseded 21:13:56 ACTION: Pratul to follow up on action 97 21:13:56 Created ACTION-150 - Follow up on action 97 [on Pratul Dublish - due 2007-11-19]. 21:15:19 Pratul: Will close 138. 21:16:37 Valentina will have something done by end of week on 143 and 133 21:17:19 Ginny: Will close 128 21:17:44 Action: Pratul to follow-up with MSM regarding open action items. 21:17:44 Created ACTION-151 - Follow-up with MSM regarding open action items. [on Pratul Dublish - due 2007-11-19]. 21:18:18 Pratul: We will assign Bassam's action items to Kumar. Kumar is updating the action items. 21:18:55 Topic: Resolutions on 11/8 call. 21:19:57 Pratul: according item 5 on agenda, everyone should look at the issue. 21:20:46 Kumar: we should make them as editorial now, and if anyone has issues, then raise the issues 21:21:23 Ginny: Question on 5040: Not clear about what we do with table? 21:21:41 Kumar: Table will go into the section on reference constraint. 21:22:26 Pratul: Will make issues as editorial according to the resolution recording in the bug. 21:23:16 John: question on 4811: What is cope of the proposal? 21:23:38 Ginny: Sandy's discussion is part of the resolution. 21:24:04 Pratul: Resolution is in comment #7. 21:24:34 No objections to accepting comment #7 as the resolution. 21:25:02 Topic: Item 6 on the agenda 21:25:56 Kumar: Does not understand the example provided by Sandy for issue 5063. 21:27:09 Pratul: We should have an email discussion of Sandy's example. 21:28:16 Sandy: Everyone should review this and think about 5064 at the same time. 21:28:36 Pratul: We will carry on discussion of 5063 in email. 21:29:33 Ginny: We cannot do anything with 5108 because it depends on 4639. We can't do anything with this issue at this time. 21:30:01 Jim has joined #sml 21:30:29 Pratul: sandy recommends added and eliminated [base URI]. 21:31:08 ...This pertains to issue 5181 21:31:36 ...Kumar summarizes the issue. 21:31:42 +Jim 21:32:31 ....Sandy: We should avoid required modifications to the document. 21:35:40 Sandy: People expect to write relative URI dependent on context. 21:36:30 Pratul: We should URIs absolute when it comes to creating SML model with a document. 21:37:58 ...Doesn't see why we must pursue this discussion. 21:38:41 Sandy: We have to tell consumers how to handle relative URIs when they are encountered. 21:41:08 Kumar: We split discussion between sml reference and schemaLocation. 21:44:39 Action: Sandy to add both types examples to the bug 5181 for discussion. 21:44:39 Created ACTION-152 - Add both types examples to the bug 5181 for discussion. [on Sandy Gao - due 2007-11-19]. 21:45:18 Issue: 5248: >locator> is not resolved. 21:46:01 Pratul: We should resolve in conformity to Kumar suggestion. 21:46:30 ...Behavior is undefined. 21:47:22 Sandy: We should try to observed different cases: network down vs. consumer doesn't resolve it. 21:48:01 Pratul: It is up to implementation to define what to do. 21:48:19 Ginny: We are not distinguishing use cases in 5040. 21:51:02 -Kirk 21:51:18 Sandy: Where resolution action fails. 21:51:37 I lost my phone connection. Can sometake over. 21:53:03 discussion on 5248 21:53:06 +Kirk 21:53:21 I'm back 21:53:45 Sandy ok with undefined when resolution fails due to transient netw error 21:54:15 Sandy would like spec to specify result when resolution process succeeds but there is no document 21:55:07 ...does not care so much which behavior the spec prescribes 21:56:29 Pratul: What does Sandy expect? 21:59:01 Sandy: We should treat this situation as if the document is not in the IF set. 21:59:09 Pratul: so we could treat all the error cases the same. If consumer does not process , if it does but there is a netw error, or it does and there is no doc , then treat those all as if the target document was not in the interchange set 22:00:10 Pratul: shall we move forward with Sandy's comment #3 in 5248. 22:00:32 Kumar notes that this decision differs from 5040, however, that is ok since is optional 22:00:38 s/comment #3/option (c) 22:01:39 Pratul: Will mark this as editorial. 22:01:49 Yes! 22:01:56 -pratul 22:01:58 -Valentina 22:01:59 -Sandy 22:01:59 -Jordan 22:02:02 -johnarwe 22:02:04 -Jim 22:02:07 -ginny 22:02:09 Adjourn at 5:02 22:02:24 rrsagent, generate minutes 22:02:24 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/11/12-sml-minutes.html Kirk 22:04:36 I'm having a problem downloading the file. Will try again. 22:04:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/11/12-sml-minutes.html Sandy 22:07:08 disconnecting the lone participant, Kirk, in XML_SMLWG()4:00PM 22:07:10 XML_SMLWG()4:00PM has ended 22:07:11 Attendees were +1.603.823.aaaa, Sandy, Kirk, Valentina, Jordan, johnarwe, ginny, Kumar, Jim 22:07:55 I'm I still on? 22:08:45 OK--I'm still try to get ahold of the minutes but it still can be found. 22:09:24 Jim has left #sml 22:12:31 Sometimes the problem gets solved by itself if you try later. 22:15:38 John, are still on? 22:16:24 I tried to access http://www.w3.org/2007 and it told me that I have insufficient privileges. 22:19:08 What's your home number? 22:41:32 johnarwe has left #sml