W3C

- DRAFT -

Weekly Forms WG Telecon

26 Sep 2007

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Charlie, wellsk, Leigh_Klotz, markbirbeck, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, unl, +034912aabb, Roger, lars, John_Boyer, +1.541.754.aacc, Blake
Regrets
Steven, Erik
Chair
John
Scribe
Leigh

Contents


 

 

<Charlie> hi john, keith

<John_Boyer> hey!

<wellsk> hi

<John_Boyer> Scribe: Leigh

can anyone help me how I can add the empty string to the xforms schema types in schema?

<lars> \o/

<Roger> Regrets also Rafael

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Sep/0082.html

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Sep/0080.html

(e-mail that John has sent)

<John_Boyer> 28http://www.w3.org/2007/09/12-forms-minutes.html#action01 <http://www.w3.org/2007/09/12-forms-minutes.html> rnhttp://www.w3.org/2007/09/12-forms-minutes.html#action01

we have had some negative replies too....

It also seems that the replies sent by our issue system didn't come through to the w3c mailing lists

it is on the list too

I also started on the readonly samples, they will be finished before next call

<klotz> ACTION: Mark Birbeck to prepare email for XForms 1.2 / WF2 charter issues. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/26-forms-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot-ng> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - Mark

<trackbot-ng> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. mseaborn, mbirbeck)

yes to ww-forms I think

a month ago

8: 20

8/20/2007

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2007Aug/0016.html

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2007Aug/0015.html

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2007Aug/0013.html

are the threads about the test suite

<klotz> ACTION: Keith Wells to read unanswered messages http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2007Aug/ from 20, 21, and 22 August from David Landwehr and answer, fix, or report to WG for discussion. We need those resolved to get the implementation report done. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/26-forms-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-418 - Wells to read unanswered messages http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2007Aug/ from 20, 21, and 22 August from David Landwehr and answer, fix, or report to WG for discussion. [on Keith Wells - due 2007-10-03].

<John_Boyer> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#fn-id

I will clean up my list too,

<lars> Leigh I think it would be possible like that (or maybe doing a reference implementation in haskell). I wasn't however able to contrain the scope of this to something that I could handle :(

can you sent an e-mail?

<klotz> Nick who are you asking?

<markbirbeck> no :)

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2007Sep/0054.html

<markbirbeck> (no experience of them...)

<John_Boyer> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#structure-abstract

in the schema it is xsd:anyURI

but that is no longer normative...

in the schema

in the schema it is xsd:anyURI

ok, sorry

<John_Boyer> propose responding to i18n group by saying that yes we do now say xsd:anyURI in the normative part of the spec

<John_Boyer> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2007Sep/0054.html

<Roger> thx

<unl> bye

<klotz> RESOLVED: Respond to i18n group by saying that yes we do now say xsd:anyURI in the normative part of the spec.

<klotz> ACTION: John Boyer to reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2007Sep/0054.html by saying that yes we do now say xsd:anyURI in the normative part of the spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/26-forms-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot-ng> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - John

<trackbot-ng> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. jkugelma, jboyer)

<John_Boyer> RESOLUTION: Respond to i18n group by saying that yes we do now say xsd:anyURI in the normative part of the spec.

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: John Boyer to reply to http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms-editor/2007Sep/0054.html by saying that yes we do now say xsd:anyURI in the normative part of the spec [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/26-forms-minutes.html#action03]
[NEW] ACTION: Keith Wells to read unanswered messages http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2007Aug/ from 20, 21, and 22 August from David Landwehr and answer, fix, or report to WG for discussion. We need those resolved to get the implementation report done. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/26-forms-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: Mark Birbeck to prepare email for XForms 1.2 / WF2 charter issues. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/26-forms-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.128 (CVS log)
$Date: 2007/09/26 16:02:02 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.128  of Date: 2007/02/23 21:38:13  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/We need those resolved to get the implementation report done.//
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: Nick
Found Scribe: Leigh

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.

Default Present: Charlie, wellsk, Leigh_Klotz, markbirbeck, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, unl, +034912aabb, Roger, lars, John_Boyer, +1.541.754.aacc, Blake
Present: Charlie wellsk Leigh_Klotz markbirbeck Nick_van_den_Bleeken unl +034912aabb Roger lars John_Boyer +1.541.754.aacc Blake
Regrets: Steven Erik
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Sep/0082.html
Got date from IRC log name: 26 Sep 2007
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/09/26-forms-minutes.html
People with action items: birbeck boyer john keith mark wells

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]