See also: IRC log
<scribe> ACTION: Individualized follow up on Use Case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/25-hcls-minutes.html#action01]
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/BIONTDSEDCM/November07F2FAgenda.html
<scribe> ACTION: Susie and Vipul to draw up agenda of F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/25-hcls-minutes.html#action02]
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/OntologyTaskForce/BIONTDSEDCM/November07F2FAgenda.html
<Susie> http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLS/F2F/
Bron Kisler: Further Investigation of Semantic Web
Bron Kisler: Differentiator = Use Case + Semantic Web
BIONT
Bron Kisler: Liason and Coordination with other activities
<ericP> vipul, agenda request: ISWC in Korea
Short introduction Semantic Web contextualized to the Use Cse
<scribe> ACTION: Collect all questions that might be helpful [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/25-hcls-minutes.html#action03]
Bron Kisler: When is CDISC going to Semantic Web
Bron Kisler: Avoid the long presentatiiont
Next Steps?
Rachel: Select a protocol
<scribe> ACTION: Stan et. al., to choose a protocol [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/09/25-hcls-minutes.html#action04]
Kavitha: Link to Semantic Web Standards
Vipul: Review Current Approaches and identified gaps
Kavitha: Re-use existing
models
... Re-use existing models
... USe existing models to choose given protocols
Alan: Model 1-3 protocols
Vipul: Model a protocol:
... Modeling Clinical Observations
... Medications, Problems, Diagnoses
Vipul Mapping them to standardized terminologies - Snomed/MedDRA
Vipul: Specification languages
for protocols
... (Rules, OWL)
Rachel: Scope is an issue.... Modeling something in One Protocol
Bron: Terminologies - NCI
Thesaurus
... Ontologies vs Terminologies
<ericP> it's great that the HCLS work has established the tractibility of the sort of broad modeling
Alan: Not important to distinguish... Differences in approach
<ericP> it defined a process which added a lot of credibility to the semweb vision
Alan: The key is to be able to
communicate clearly and precisely
... Not productive for this use case for differentiating
between CVs and Ontologies
Bron: Academic/NIH speaking
... Ontologies
... FDA/Regulatory Agencies: using CVs
Alan: how much data do we need
for this to be convincing?
... Need feedback on success criteria -- the role of data scale
in the success of definition
<ericP> 2007-11-12T09:00-12:30 W13: Semantic Web in Ubiquitous Healthcare
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.128 of Date: 2007/02/23 21:38:13 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: vipul Inferring Scribes: vipul WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: Alan Bron Chimezie_Ogbuji IBM Kavitha Kerstin_Forsberg Rachel Susie Vipul Vipul_Kashyap aaaa aabb alanr alanr_ chimezie ericP jar286 You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy WARNING: No meeting title found! You should specify the meeting title like this: <dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Got date from IRC log name: 25 Sep 2007 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/09/25-hcls-minutes.html People with action items: al. collect et. individualized stan susie vipul WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option. WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]