IRC log of forms on 2007-07-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:52:13 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #forms
- 14:52:13 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc
- 14:52:18 [John_Boyer]
- rrsagent, make log public
- 14:52:22 [John_Boyer]
- Chair: John
- 14:52:42 [John_Boyer]
- Meeting: Weekly Forms WG Teleconference
- 14:53:35 [Schnitz]
- Schnitz has joined #forms
- 14:53:40 [Schnitz]
- hi
- 14:55:13 [jturner]
- jturner has joined #forms
- 14:58:18 [John_Boyer]
- John_Boyer has changed the topic to: Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jul/0041.html
- 14:58:27 [Zakim]
- HTML_Forms()11:00AM has now started
- 14:58:34 [Zakim]
- +John_Boyer
- 14:58:51 [Zakim]
- + +49.308.322.aaaa
- 14:59:00 [Roger]
- Roger has joined #forms
- 14:59:25 [Schnitz]
- zakim, code?
- 14:59:25 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Schnitz
- 14:59:26 [jturner]
- zakim, aaaa is me
- 14:59:27 [Zakim]
- +jturner; got it
- 14:59:46 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 14:59:50 [wellsk]
- wellsk has joined #forms
- 15:00:15 [John_Boyer]
- zakim, [ is wellsk
- 15:00:15 [Zakim]
- +wellsk; got it
- 15:00:34 [Rafael]
- Rafael has joined #forms
- 15:01:12 [Zakim]
- +??P26
- 15:01:20 [Schnitz]
- zakim, ??p26 is me
- 15:01:32 [Schnitz]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:01:35 [jturner]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:01:38 [Zakim]
- +Schnitz; got it
- 15:01:40 [Zakim]
- +[IBM]
- 15:01:56 [Zakim]
- Schnitz should now be muted
- 15:02:02 [Zakim]
- jturner should now be muted
- 15:02:22 [Zakim]
- + +091211aabb
- 15:02:35 [Roger]
- zakim, aabb is Roger
- 15:02:51 [Charlie]
- Charlie has joined #forms
- 15:02:54 [Zakim]
- +Roger; got it
- 15:02:59 [Charlie]
- zakim, who is on?
- 15:03:05 [Nick]
- Nick has joined #Forms
- 15:03:10 [Steven]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:03:15 [John_Boyer]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jul/0041.html
- 15:03:16 [Roger]
- zakim, Roger has Rafael
- 15:03:21 [Steven]
- (Zakim is very slow today)
- 15:03:22 [Zakim]
- I don't understand your question, Charlie.
- 15:03:30 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see John_Boyer, jturner (muted), wellsk, Schnitz (muted), [IBM], Roger
- 15:03:36 [Charlie]
- zakim, [IBM] is Charlie
- 15:03:40 [Charlie]
- * thanks, steven
- 15:03:43 [Zakim]
- +Rafael; got it
- 15:04:00 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Nick, Charlie, Rafael, wellsk, Roger, jturner, Schnitz, RRSAgent, Zakim, John_Boyer, markbirbeck, Steven
- 15:04:16 [Zakim]
- +Charlie; got it
- 15:04:35 [markbirbeck]
- joining in just a moment
- 15:05:02 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 15:05:10 [Zakim]
- +Nick_van_den_Bleeken
- 15:05:17 [Steven]
- q+ to ask who has implemented inputmode
- 15:05:30 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 15:05:32 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 15:06:39 [Blake]
- Blake has joined #forms
- 15:06:40 [lars]
- lars has joined #forms
- 15:07:48 [Zakim]
- + +1.541.754.aacc
- 15:08:00 [Blake]
- zakim, aacc is me
- 15:08:00 [Zakim]
- +Blake; got it
- 15:08:13 [Zakim]
- + +6aadd
- 15:08:27 [lars]
- zakim, I am +6aa
- 15:08:27 [Zakim]
- +lars; got it
- 15:08:36 [Zakim]
- +markbirbeck
- 15:08:38 [lars]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:08:38 [Zakim]
- lars should now be muted
- 15:08:44 [Blake]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:08:46 [Zakim]
- Blake should now be muted
- 15:08:52 [Steven]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:08:52 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see John_Boyer, jturner (muted), wellsk, Schnitz (muted), Charlie, Roger, Nick_van_den_Bleeken (muted), Steven, Blake (muted), lars (muted), markbirbeck
- 15:08:54 [jturner]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:08:56 [Zakim]
- Roger has Rafael
- 15:08:57 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see lars, Blake, Nick, Charlie, Rafael, wellsk, Roger, jturner, Schnitz, RRSAgent, Zakim, John_Boyer, markbirbeck, Steven
- 15:08:59 [Zakim]
- +??P32
- 15:09:00 [Zakim]
- jturner should no longer be muted
- 15:09:21 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:09:21 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-minutes.html Steven
- 15:09:40 [lars]
- I hear a lot of noise on the line, anyone else having problems?
- 15:09:43 [ebruchez]
- ebruchez has joined #forms
- 15:09:57 [ebruchez]
- zakim, who is on the phone
- 15:09:57 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'who is on the phone', ebruchez
- 15:10:11 [Schnitz]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:10:11 [Zakim]
- Schnitz should no longer be muted
- 15:10:13 [Steven]
- Meeting: Forms WG Weekly Meeting
- 15:10:20 [Steven]
- CHair: John
- 15:10:28 [Steven]
- Scribe: jturner
- 15:10:32 [Steven]
- s/CH/Ch/
- 15:10:48 [ebruchez]
- zakim, who's here
- 15:10:48 [Zakim]
- ebruchez, you need to end that query with '?'
- 15:10:53 [ebruchez]
- zakim, who's here?
- 15:10:53 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see John_Boyer, jturner, wellsk, Schnitz, Charlie, Roger, Nick_van_den_Bleeken (muted), Steven, Blake (muted), lars (muted), markbirbeck, ??P32
- 15:10:56 [Zakim]
- Roger has Rafael
- 15:10:57 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see ebruchez, lars, Blake, Nick, Charlie, Rafael, wellsk, Roger, jturner, Schnitz, RRSAgent, Zakim, John_Boyer, markbirbeck, Steven
- 15:11:06 [ebruchez]
- zakim, ??P32 is ebruchez
- 15:11:06 [Zakim]
- +ebruchez; got it
- 15:11:22 [Schnitz]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:11:22 [Zakim]
- Schnitz should now be muted
- 15:11:40 [John_Boyer]
- Topic: inputmode implementation
- 15:12:08 [John_Boyer]
- Regrets: MarkS
- 15:12:33 [jturner]
- we don't
- 15:12:45 [Charlie]
- Steven: we're adding inputmode to xhtml 1.1 but need implementer reports for it to stay
- 15:12:55 [Charlie]
- Mark: we don't have it but are looking into it
- 15:13:11 [John_Boyer]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Jul/0041.html
- 15:13:26 [Schnitz]
- Topic: coming calls
- 15:13:33 [Schnitz]
- John: Please check soon
- 15:13:50 [Zakim]
- -ebruchez
- 15:14:08 [Schnitz]
- John: Steven will chair when I am unavail. If we have calls
- 15:14:18 [John_Boyer]
- John_Boyer has joined #forms
- 15:14:21 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 15:14:37 [ebruchez]
- zakim, [IPcaller is ebruchez
- 15:14:37 [Zakim]
- +ebruchez; got it
- 15:15:05 [Schnitz]
- topic: Upcoming FtF
- 15:15:17 [Schnitz]
- John: do we have a page for the FtF?
- 15:15:32 [jturner]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:15:32 [Zakim]
- jturner should now be muted
- 15:15:35 [Steven]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2007/09/ftf/
- 15:16:29 [unl]
- unl has joined #forms
- 15:16:29 [John_Boyer]
- John_Boyer has joined #forms
- 15:16:34 [Schnitz]
- Hi uli
- 15:16:39 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:16:39 [Zakim]
- markbirbeck should now be muted
- 15:17:04 [Schnitz]
- Topic: XForms 1.0 3rd Ed.
- 15:17:10 [markbirbeck]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:17:10 [Zakim]
- markbirbeck should no longer be muted
- 15:17:12 [Schnitz]
- John: largely ready
- 15:17:23 [Schnitz]
- John: need to change link to test suite
- 15:17:44 [Schnitz]
- John: simple, will be done fast, second bit, www-forms-editor we have an email to request the version attribute
- 15:18:51 [Schnitz]
- yep
- 15:18:57 [Schnitz]
- scribe: schnitz
- 15:19:03 [Schnitz]
- scribe: Schnitz
- 15:19:16 [Schnitz]
- Resolution: add verison attribute to XHTML 1.0 Third Ed.
- 15:19:24 [Zakim]
- -lars
- 15:19:25 [Schnitz]
- s/verison/version
- 15:19:44 [lars]
- bad zakim
- 15:19:47 [John_Boyer]
- s/XHTML/XForms
- 15:19:57 [Schnitz]
- Steven: do we have an errata page for Third Ed.?
- 15:20:07 [Schnitz]
- John: That is right, we need to create one
- 15:20:14 [Zakim]
- +Svante
- 15:20:23 [Schnitz]
- Action: John to add version attribute to XForms 1.0 Third Edition
- 15:20:36 [lars]
- zakim, I am svante
- 15:20:36 [Zakim]
- ok, lars, I now associate you with Svante
- 15:20:39 [Schnitz]
- Action: John to start an errata page for XForms 1.0 3rd Ed.
- 15:20:49 [Schnitz]
- John: Moving on to XForms 1.1...
- 15:20:56 [lars]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:20:56 [Zakim]
- Svante should now be muted
- 15:21:01 [Schnitz]
- Zakim, code?
- 15:21:01 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 36767 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), Schnitz
- 15:21:47 [Schnitz]
- John: There is one issue (103?105?... Steve Speicher)... there actually two issues... I would like to split them
- 15:22:12 [Schnitz]
- John: I can't forward it, its deleted in my mailbox
- 15:22:25 [Zakim]
- + +49.336.293.aaee
- 15:22:55 [Schnitz]
- John: Steven, if I go into the archive, can I reply and change the "to" line, will Shane's system understand?
- 15:23:25 [Schnitz]
- Action: Steven to find that message and to sent it twice
- 15:23:34 [Schnitz]
- s/sent/send
- 15:23:46 [Schnitz]
- John: its under misc
- 15:23:54 [Schnitz]
- (looking for message)
- 15:24:01 [Schnitz]
- issue found
- 15:24:05 [Schnitz]
- number 5?
- 15:24:33 [Schnitz]
- ok number 5 to be trashed once splitted
- 15:24:45 [Schnitz]
- Topic: XForms at the XML conference
- 15:25:18 [Schnitz]
- John: The announcement went out, I will like to correct, do not simply reply, but reply-all, so everyone sees the comments
- 15:25:25 [Schnitz]
- s/will/would
- 15:25:38 [Schnitz]
- sure
- 15:26:08 [Schnitz]
- John: get your act together and submit rather sooner than later :-)
- 15:26:16 [Schnitz]
- Topic: XForms Transitional
- 15:26:21 [Schnitz]
- John: Charter confusion
- 15:26:35 [Schnitz]
- John: XForms 1.1., XForms-T, XHTML 2.0 as deliverables
- 15:26:54 [Schnitz]
- John: We thought that XForms 1.2 was seperate from XForms-T
- 15:27:12 [Schnitz]
- John: XForms 1.2 is still undefined in terms of milestones
- 15:27:35 [Schnitz]
- John: Its not clear to me what we can do in an XForms 1.2 other than supporting XForms-T
- 15:27:55 [Schnitz]
- John: And if we don't start on XForms 2, we miss these milestones
- 15:28:03 [John_Boyer]
- http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/
- 15:28:35 [Schnitz]
- John: 1st Public WD end of this year, LC next year
- 15:28:49 [Schnitz]
- John: 6 Months from 1st WD to LC is unrealistic
- 15:29:11 [Schnitz]
- John: I am proposing that XForms-T *is* XForms 1.2
- 15:30:18 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck: Lots of things I would like see in XForms-T, but, the naming isn't right, therefore I have a hard time putting time into it, and 2), the relationship with the HTML-WG is very draining
- 15:30:52 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck: However, that simplification area is important, but the current context is too difficult, what do others think about?
- 15:30:57 [Schnitz]
- zakim, unmute me
- 15:30:57 [Zakim]
- Schnitz should no longer be muted
- 15:31:45 [unl]
- unl has joined #forms
- 15:32:01 [Zakim]
- -Roger
- 15:32:13 [Schnitz]
- Schnitz, +1 with Markbirbeck
- 15:32:22 [Schnitz]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:32:22 [Zakim]
- Schnitz should now be muted
- 15:33:02 [Schnitz]
- John: the task force is about mapping whatever we have into what is being done in the HTML WG, they might do that or not, we should make technical decisions based on that, though
- 15:33:47 [Schnitz]
- John: Custom controls...
- 15:33:55 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck: is that 2.0 or 1.2?
- 15:34:05 [Zakim]
- +??P7
- 15:34:16 [Roger]
- zakim, ??p7 is Roger
- 15:34:16 [Zakim]
- +Roger; got it
- 15:34:23 [Schnitz]
- John: IF custom controls can be combined with something that is simple to author, then its a 1.2 issue, IMO
- 15:34:29 [Roger]
- zakim, Roger has Rafael
- 15:34:29 [Zakim]
- +Rafael; got it
- 15:35:05 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck: I can offer time in the context that Schnitz and John proposed...
- 15:35:18 [Schnitz]
- yep
- 15:35:48 [Nick]
- If that is the course I can make some time free for that too
- 15:36:05 [Schnitz]
- Action: Editorial Ownership of the Former XForms Transitional work goes to Mark Birbeck and Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer
- 15:36:19 [Schnitz]
- Resolution: XForms Transitional will be merged with XForms 1.2
- 15:36:19 [Nick]
- (if it is simplification, custom controls,..)
- 15:36:42 [Schnitz]
- yes, please nick!
- 15:36:58 [Nick]
- can do, with some help
- 15:37:05 [markbirbeck]
- great!
- 15:37:18 [jturner]
- i would give a little help too if necessary
- 15:37:26 [Schnitz]
- Resolution: Co-editors of XForms 1.2, former XForms Transitional, are Mark Birbeck, Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer and Nick Van Den Bleeken
- 15:37:57 [Schnitz]
- jturner, ok, good to know...
- 15:38:41 [Schnitz]
- John: anything with the Joint Task Force seemed to be things we would have to do to XForms, instead of the HTML side making changing
- 15:38:59 [Steven]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 15:38:59 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-minutes.html Steven
- 15:39:15 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck: The problem already is what we mean by architectural consistency...
- 15:39:49 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck: For us, MVC is a core idea here, and they dispute that, but still think its architecturally consistent, which of course won't make sense
- 15:40:12 [Schnitz]
- :-)
- 15:40:34 [lars]
- zakim appears to be emotional as well, dropped me again
- 15:40:39 [Schnitz]
- John: would be possible for the editors for to be also the TF members?
- 15:40:45 [Schnitz]
- Schnitz, +1
- 15:40:55 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck: are there any meetings plans yet
- 15:40:57 [Zakim]
- -Svante
- 15:41:06 [Schnitz]
- John: no, we need members, they will then define communication
- 15:41:14 [Zakim]
- +Svante
- 15:41:26 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck, +1
- 15:41:28 [lars]
- zakim, Svante is lars
- 15:41:28 [Zakim]
- +lars; got it
- 15:41:36 [Charlie]
- Thank you all
- 15:41:45 [Schnitz]
- Nick_van_den_Bleeken, +1
- 15:41:48 [lars]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:41:48 [Zakim]
- lars should now be muted
- 15:41:48 [Schnitz]
- John: thank you
- 15:42:33 [Schnitz]
- Resolution: The tree current co-editors of XForms 1.2, formerly XForms Transitional, will also be the three members of the Joint Forms TF from the Forms WG side
- 15:42:46 [Schnitz]
- Topic: Progress on Action items
- 15:43:03 [Schnitz]
- John: Everyone, please check with the action item list, and please make progress on it hits week
- 15:43:10 [Schnitz]
- s/hits/this
- 15:43:16 [Steven]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:43:16 [Zakim]
- Steven should now be muted
- 15:43:37 [Schnitz]
- (John explains details in handling the Action item lists)
- 15:43:56 [Steven]
- Tell me if you need an account
- 15:44:09 [Schnitz]
- s/tree/three
- 15:44:37 [Schnitz]
- Topic: LC issues
- 15:45:05 [Schnitz]
- Topic: Issue 151, identical 106
- 15:45:19 [Schnitz]
- John: get rid of 151?
- 15:45:29 [Schnitz]
- John: Steven, can you look at this?
- 15:45:52 [Steven]
- ack me
- 15:45:54 [Zakim]
- Steven, you wanted to ask who has implemented inputmode
- 15:46:16 [Schnitz]
- Action: Steven to look whether Issue 151 and Issue 106 are identical, and if so, get rid of Issue 151
- 15:46:44 [Schnitz]
- Topic: Removing the notion of homogeneous collection
- 15:46:49 [John_Boyer]
- http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/UI?id=26;user=guest;statetype=1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1
- 15:47:28 [Schnitz]
- John: we already agreed to rewriting text of getting rid of homogeneous collection
- 15:47:37 [Schnitz]
- John: So we can just go ahead here
- 15:48:15 [Schnitz]
- John: We need an action to get rid of homogeneous collection (checking)?
- 15:48:26 [Schnitz]
- ... investigating
- 15:48:35 [Schnitz]
- There is an old action item on Mark
- 15:48:42 [Schnitz]
- John: thats defunct
- 15:48:48 [Schnitz]
- John: we need a new action item
- 15:49:06 [lars]
- zakim unmute me
- 15:49:21 [Schnitz]
- Action: Eliminate Wording on homogeneous collection on repeat, assigned to Ulrich Nicolas Lisse
- 15:49:31 [lars]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:49:31 [Zakim]
- lars was already muted, lars
- 15:49:33 [Schnitz]
- John: moving on...
- 15:49:43 [Schnitz]
- Topic: 3 editorial issues...
- 15:49:54 [Schnitz]
- John: simple run-by
- 15:49:57 [unl]
- zakim, mute me
- 15:49:57 [Zakim]
- sorry, unl, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you
- 15:50:01 [Schnitz]
- Issue 91?
- 15:50:11 [Schnitz]
- (checking)
- 15:50:29 [Nick]
- http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Multi-issue?id=91;user=guest;selectid=91;statetype=-1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1
- 15:50:56 [Schnitz]
- Topic: Issue 91, bunch of Typos, by Uli
- 15:51:05 [Schnitz]
- John: Any objection me just going forward?
- 15:51:16 [Steven]
- COnmfirmed that issue 151 was a reply to 106
- 15:51:20 [Steven]
- I have merged them
- 15:51:22 [Schnitz]
- Resolution: John to follow as proposed in Issue 91
- 15:51:29 [Schnitz]
- Action: John to address Issue 91
- 15:51:33 [John_Boyer]
- http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Model?id=127;user=guest;statetype=1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1
- 15:51:39 [Schnitz]
- Topic: Issue 127
- 15:52:41 [unl]
- john, issue 91 is in Multi-issue, not in Controls
- 15:52:41 [Schnitz]
- Containing *or compound* document profile to add foreign namespace decl.
- 15:52:47 [Schnitz]
- John: ok
- 15:53:06 [Schnitz]
- Resolution: Issue 127 accepted
- 15:53:22 [Schnitz]
- Action: John to move forward with Issue 127 as proposed by Issue 127
- 15:53:44 [John_Boyer]
- http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/UI?id=23;user=guest;statetype=-1;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1
- 15:53:49 [Schnitz]
- Topic: Issue 23
- 15:54:00 [Schnitz]
- John: issue for me
- 15:54:41 [Schnitz]
- (John reading wording)
- 15:54:59 [Schnitz]
- John: the wording is misleading
- 15:55:21 [Schnitz]
- John: information is redundant
- 15:56:07 [Schnitz]
- John: I propose to shoot that Paragraph
- 15:56:10 [Charlie]
- sounds good
- 15:56:28 [Schnitz]
- John: any objection
- 15:56:33 [Schnitz]
- No objection
- 15:56:45 [Schnitz]
- Action: John to address Issue 23
- 15:57:26 [John_Boyer]
- http://htmlwg.mn.aptest.com/cgi-bin/xforms-issues/Submission?id=103;user=guest;statetype=4;upostype=-1;changetype=-1;restype=-1
- 15:57:50 [Schnitz]
- Topic: Issue from S. Speicher 103, related to immediately following from S. Pemberton
- 15:58:12 [Schnitz]
- John: Steve says he miss a normative ref to what the HTTP verb actually is
- 15:58:36 [Schnitz]
- John: It turns out that HTTP verb is used quite a bit
- 15:58:51 [Schnitz]
- John: But we don't say that in our spec
- 15:59:14 [Schnitz]
- John: Steven, had similar problems to Steve
- 15:59:23 [Schnitz]
- Topic: Is "HTTP verb
- 15:59:39 [Schnitz]
- intuitive or misleading...
- 16:00:15 [Schnitz]
- Steven: we need to define it properly
- 16:00:20 [Schnitz]
- John: +1
- 16:01:31 [Schnitz]
- John: I really think that a lot of problems will be cleared up when under submission options that table should probably say what the default submission verb is to be and show a default string
- 16:01:40 [John_Boyer]
- It would be clearer if the fourth column of the submission options table werernentitled "Default Submission Verb" and then the table entries were of the formrn"POST" (HTTP POST or equivalent).
- 16:02:07 [Schnitz]
- John: I propose wording there...
- 16:02:18 [Schnitz]
- John: Resolution?
- 16:02:23 [Schnitz]
- Any objections?
- 16:02:38 [Schnitz]
- No, fine
- 16:03:03 [Schnitz]
- Steven: we should also add a sentence if free-floating text what we me mean by verb
- 16:03:09 [Schnitz]
- John: Yes, 1+
- 16:03:23 [lars]
- http 1.1 sect 5.1 request line / 5.1.1 method would be the reference
- 16:04:01 [Schnitz]
- John: Yes, its about not resolving the final wording now, but that we resolve that we assign an action to come up with wording at those places for this
- 16:04:18 [Schnitz]
- +1
- 16:04:30 [Schnitz]
- Time is up
- 16:04:58 [lars]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:04:58 [Zakim]
- lars should no longer be muted
- 16:05:05 [Schnitz]
- John: We need text similar how SOAP and WSDL is connecting its abstract concept to HTTP
- 16:06:16 [Schnitz]
- Markbirbeck: We could use method as the element name
- 16:06:23 [Schnitz]
- Lars: I guess its ok
- 16:06:38 [Schnitz]
- John: please continue on the mailing list...
- 16:06:44 [Schnitz]
- zakim, unmute me
- 16:06:44 [Zakim]
- Schnitz should no longer be muted
- 16:06:50 [Schnitz]
- Steven: please kick off...
- 16:06:55 [Zakim]
- -Charlie
- 16:06:55 [Nick]
- bye
- 16:06:56 [Zakim]
- -lars
- 16:06:57 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 16:06:59 [Zakim]
- -markbirbeck
- 16:07:00 [Zakim]
- -Blake
- 16:07:01 [Zakim]
- - +49.336.293.aaee
- 16:07:02 [Zakim]
- -John_Boyer
- 16:07:03 [Zakim]
- -wellsk
- 16:07:05 [Zakim]
- -ebruchez
- 16:07:06 [Zakim]
- -jturner
- 16:07:07 [Zakim]
- -Nick_van_den_Bleeken
- 16:07:18 [Schnitz]
- Action: John to kick off on mailing list discussion on Issue 103
- 16:07:22 [wellsk]
- wellsk has left #forms
- 16:07:32 [Zakim]
- -Schnitz
- 16:07:59 [Blake]
- quit
- 16:08:09 [Blake]
- Blake has left #forms
- 16:08:15 [unl]
- zakim, +49.336.293.aaee was me
- 16:08:15 [Zakim]
- I don't understand '+49.336.293.aaee was me', unl
- 16:08:23 [Schnitz]
- John_Boyer, thanks, I'll head off... r u and Steven fine with generating minutes of this?
- 16:08:41 [Zakim]
- -Roger
- 16:08:42 [Zakim]
- HTML_Forms()11:00AM has ended
- 16:08:43 [John_Boyer]
- yes
- 16:08:44 [Zakim]
- Attendees were John_Boyer, +49.308.322.aaaa, jturner, wellsk, Schnitz, +091211aabb, Rafael, Charlie, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, Steven, +1.541.754.aacc, Blake, +6aadd, lars,
- 16:08:46 [Zakim]
- ... markbirbeck, ebruchez, [IPcaller], +49.336.293.aaee
- 16:08:50 [Schnitz]
- ok, bye
- 16:09:00 [John_Boyer]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:09:00 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-minutes.html John_Boyer
- 16:09:10 [John_Boyer]
- rrsagent, bye
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- I see 10 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-actions.rdf :
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: John to add version attribute to XForms 1.0 Third Edition [1]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-20-23
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: John to start an errata page for XForms 1.0 3rd Ed. [2]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-20-39
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Steven to find that message and to sent it twice [3]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-23-25
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Editorial Ownership of the Former XForms Transitional work goes to Mark Birbeck and Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer [4]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-36-05
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Steven to look whether Issue 151 and Issue 106 are identical, and if so, get rid of Issue 151 [5]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-46-16
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: Eliminate Wording on homogeneous collection on repeat, assigned to Ulrich Nicolas Lisse [6]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-49-21
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: John to address Issue 91 [7]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-51-29
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: John to move forward with Issue 127 as proposed by Issue 127 [8]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-53-22
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: John to address Issue 23 [9]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T15-56-45
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: John to kick off on mailing list discussion on Issue 103 [10]
- 16:09:10 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/11-forms-irc#T16-07-18