See also: IRC log
<r12a> interesting post: http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2007/02/12/International-Mailto-URIs-in-IE7.aspx
<r12a> International Mailto URIs in IE7
http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-i18ncore-minutes
approved
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to make updates of LTLI taking Michaels feedback into account (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to contact Russ and others to figure out how IE 7 handles display of Punycode and language preference settings (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
Richard: waiting for feedback from Russ
<scribe> ACTION: all to give feedback on LTLI update (ONGOING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to write a mail about possibility for SVG tiny specific IRI tests to Chris and the i18n core list (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod norm (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
Richard: we already talked about that
... the situation is: if your language preference is latin-based, you
can have any character from latin characters sets
... if you have an arabic language setting, it works script based.
Francois: one week left
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2007Feb/0006.html
Felix: general question: should the task force operate in member space or in public?
Francois: should be public if possibly
... if the participating WGs have a non-public way of working it
could be an issue
... IMO it should be as public as possible
... on participation information (who participates), I don't care about making
it public
... without mail addresses (because of spam)
... documents should be as public as possible
... I will reply to your
message
Richard: can't see why it should not be public
(discussion, agreement that the document should be public)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007JanMar/0044.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2007JanMar/0045.html
Richard: mail at 0044 contains 4 comments
<r12a> http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-forms-utf-8
Richard: would be good to see a rerefence to this article
Felix: I'll have also look at the document
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to look at the mobileOK document and send Richard's (and possilby more) comments about MobileOK [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/13-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
place holder
(Richard describes the AC review result)
Felix: no new info, this work and charmod will be done in architecture group
Richard: we need to figure out how to cooperate with the GEO people
... maybe have some joint calls and see
how it works
<r12a> http://www.webstandards.org/2007/02/01/wasp-announces-the-international-liaison-group-ilg/
Richard: I have contacted the leaders of the project and they want to cooperate with us
... we might leave
it until we recharter
... they are writing e.g. articles
(see http://www.webstandards.org/learn/ )
Richard: they could participate in i18n core and make articles on the W3C site available, or we publish jointly articles