13:42:48 RRSAgent has joined #i18nits 13:42:48 logging to http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc 13:43:06 akim, this will be ITS_TS 13:43:14 zakim, this will be ITS_TS 13:43:14 I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled near this time, YvesS 13:44:05 zakim, this will be I18N_TS 13:44:05 ok, YvesS; I see I18N_TS()10:00AM scheduled to start in 16 minutes 13:56:25 fsasaki has joined #i18nits 13:57:27 meeting: i18n ITS Working Group 13:57:29 chair: Yvs 13:57:34 s/Yvs/Yves/ 13:57:38 scribe: Felix 13:57:43 scribeNick: fsasaki 13:57:57 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0002.html 13:58:06 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0002.html 13:58:14 :) 14:00:25 chriLi has joined #i18nits 14:00:55 I18N_TS()10:00AM has now started 14:00:57 +Felix 14:01:16 +??P18 14:01:20 -Felix 14:01:21 +Felix 14:01:45 + +1.303.962.aaaa 14:04:44 regrets: Andrzej, Richard 14:05:50 topic: action items 14:06:06 action: All to think about features at risk (ONGOING) 14:06:14 Yves: posted a list 14:07:07 +Sebastian_Rahtz 14:07:44 Felix: I would say we need to list at least the ruby attributes used for pointing 14:07:47 rahtz has joined #i18nits 14:08:40 .. Sebastian and me can work on everything , right? 14:08:51 Sebastian: yes. What we do is just "reporting" 14:08:55 Felix: that is enough 14:09:18 Sebastian: it is not guarenteed that it happens simuntaneously, might be a pipeline 14:09:37 Yves: so all features would be twice, maybe even more 14:10:12 .. do we need really the ruby pointers as features at risk 14:10:25 Sebastian: might technically make sense 14:11:02 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0425.html 14:13:37 Felix: do we need to mark the MUST in the statement as a feature at risk? 14:14:15 Yves: I don't see the problem 14:14:59 (Christian reformulates the mail) 14:20:57 Yves: we could put this as features at risk, although I'm not sure what the problem is 14:22:21 .. what would happen if we have this as feature at risk and nobody implements it? 14:22:49 felix: we would have to remove the MUST statement and have a non-normative reference to RFC 4646 14:24:48 Christian: our conformance clauses don't go to the level of values 14:25:05 .. for the processing expectations 14:26:37 Yves: let's flag it, just to be sure 14:30:34 RESOLUTION: the "MUST" for langRule and the pointing mechanisms for ruby are features at risk 14:31:00 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 14:31:43 action: Felix to make the change "not possible" with "not applicable" and go back to i18n core (DONE) 14:32:15 Felix: did the change. This was not an i18n core comment 14:32:25 action: Yves to add sumaries for issues in Bugzilla (DONE) 14:32:33 .. by Felix ;) 14:32:46 action: Yves to send mails for replies to comments (ONGOING) 14:33:03 http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/lc-replies.html 14:34:56 action: Felix to go back to Steven Pemperton with issue http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/lc-replies.html#issue-3331 14:35:30 action: Everybody to look at the draft, to see if it is ready for CR transition (ONGOING) 14:36:12 action: Sebastian looking at the 'rbspanrbspan' problem (PENDING) 14:37:14 Yves: we could find a workaround 14:37:29 .. the other problem is more important, that is the list of attributes 14:37:59 action: Yves to add a bug for the removal of rbPointer 14:38:32 topic: issues not closed 14:38:36 see http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/issues 14:40:18 Yves: let's vote for CR today, given that the open issues are resolved 14:40:22 Sebastian: o.k. 14:40:55 RESOLUTION: WG votes for CR under the condition that issues http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3514 and http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3466 are closed 14:41:00 See http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-40-55 14:41:44 topic: things to do for CR preparation 14:41:47 see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0005.html 14:42:32 Yves volunteers to do the change log 14:42:37 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2006JulSep/0027.html 14:42:48 Sebastian: I will do the implementation report tonight 14:43:29 Yves: other things to do? 14:43:32 http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/lc-replies.html 14:43:56 Yves: fine with the presentation. I don't like the colors so much 14:45:09 .. maybe have more space between each issue 14:45:38 .. and have at the end of the doc s.t. like "this is the end" 14:46:24 action: felix to adopt change proposals from Yves for http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/lc-replies.html 14:46:53 topic: discussion of (new) charter 14:47:04 Yves: have not thought about that much yet 14:47:48 Sebastian: no thought about that yet 14:47:55 Christian: work on errata 14:48:18 .. helping people with implementations 14:48:46 Felix: for example test suite productions? 14:48:51 Christian: plays a role 14:48:59 Yves: trying to evangalize 14:49:13 Christian: yes. But main point would be to do errata 14:49:24 .. and to ensure interoperability 14:50:34 Felix: how about issue http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3126 ? Is it o.k. to postone it? 14:50:40 Christian: not sure 14:51:13 .. depends on the timeline 14:52:26 Felix: we could also have a short charter e.g. for 10 months, and have a new one after that with new features in ITS 1.x 14:52:39 Yves: the BP document should be in the new charter as well 14:55:14 Adjourn 14:55:18 -Sebastian_Rahtz 14:55:21 -YvesS 14:55:53 present: Christian, Felix, Sebastian, Yves 15:12:44 rahtz has joined #i18nits 15:14:45 rahtz has left #i18nits 15:15:45 -chriLi 15:15:48 -Felix 15:15:49 I18N_TS()10:00AM has ended 15:15:50 Attendees were Felix, +1.303.962.aaaa, chriLi, YvesS, Sebastian_Rahtz 15:21:23 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-minutes.html fsasaki 15:32:28 Zakim has left #i18nits 15:32:32 I see 9 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-actions.rdf : 15:32:32 ACTION: All to think about features at risk (ONGOING) [1] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-06-06 15:32:32 ACTION: Felix to make the change "not possible" with "not applicable" and go back to i18n core (DONE) [2] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-31-43 15:32:32 ACTION: Yves to add sumaries for issues in Bugzilla (DONE) [3] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-32-25 15:32:32 ACTION: Yves to send mails for replies to comments (ONGOING) [4] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-32-46 15:32:32 ACTION: Felix to go back to Steven Pemperton with issue http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/lc-replies.html#issue-3331 [5] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-34-56 15:32:32 ACTION: Everybody to look at the draft, to see if it is ready for CR transition (ONGOING) [6] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-35-30 15:32:32 ACTION: Sebastian looking at the 'rbspanrbspan' problem (PENDING) [7] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-36-12 15:32:32 ACTION: Yves to add a bug for the removal of rbPointer [8] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-37-59 15:32:32 ACTION: felix to adopt change proposals from Yves for http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/lc-replies.html [9] 15:32:32 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/10/04-i18nits-irc#T14-46-24 15:32:35 fsasaki has left #i18nits