<dorchard> 3348 isn't working, conference is restricted

<asir> open editorial actions - http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/open

<dorchard> I'm the first participant :-)

<scribe> scribenick: maryann

<prasad> scribe: maryann

<scribe> Meeting: WS-Policy Editors F2F

review editorials from F2F

<prasad> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/open

<dorchard> I'll do action-6 and 24 and 25 and 26

we're assigning the action items

some disagreement about the process...dave would like to lighten our process

prasad wants to assign items

action 1 = maryann

action 2 = maryann

action 3 = toufic

action 4 is closed

action 5 is closed

action 6 = dave

note toufic needs to work it out with dave

action 7 = dave

action 8 is closed

action 9 closed by prasad ( created in error)

action 10 -asir

action 12 - asir

action 13 - dave

action 14 - maryann

action 15 - done

action 16 - prasad

action 17- prasad

action 18 - felix

action 19 - toufic

action 20 - felix

action 21 - closed

action 22 - asir

action 23 - prasad

action 24 - dave

action -25 dave

action 26 - dave

action 22 is blocked by action 26

dave will notify asir when complete

action 27 - dave

action 28 - dave ( need to come back to discuss )

<prasad> AOB: Discussion on 28

action 29 - prasad

action 30 - asir

action 31 - done

action 32 - dave

action 33 - prasad

action 34 - prasad

action 35 - toufic

action 36 - toufic

action 37- asir

action 38- toufic

action 39 - prasad

action 40 - prasad

end of assigning issues

28 --- Dave

dave: the way I hear this, this is a style vs substance discussion
... the text in the definition is the same as the text in the intro and are identical
... glen doesn't like this style, so instead of defining things later, was wondering if we could separate presentation from content and change the way the termdefs are styled
... so that the text doesn't look so cluttered

asir: theres a balance we have to achieve

dave: to continue looking at other ways ...

prasad: do we want to target a date

dave: need to work on mine late last week

prasad: dave to target monday 25th sept
... all changes targetted for 25th sept

maryann- asking for review of counter proposal

<prasad> We target to send out updated editors draft by Tuesday 26th sept

<prasad> Dave: I really like your new proposal (sent yesterday) maryann

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy-eds/2006Sep/0043.html

dave: likes it

asir: follows what i had proposed
... term domain is really hard to define

toufic: better than cats

prasad: when's the next meeting?

maryann: who's chair next week?

toufic: i am

<scribe> ACTION: toufic to poll authors on tues to see if we need to meet on Wed ( 20) and send out agenda if needed [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/14-ws-policy-eds-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-41 - Poll authors on tues to see if we need to meet on Wed ( 20) and send out agenda if needed [on Toufic Boubez - due 2006-09-21].

prasad: next meeting scribe is prasad

prasad is next working group reporter

<prasad> Adjourned

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127  of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/asir/toufic/
Succeeded: s/25th/25th sept/g
Found ScribeNick: maryann
Found Scribe: maryann
Inferring ScribeNick: maryann
Present: Dorchard maryann asir prasad toufic
Got date from IRC log name: 14 Sep 2006
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2006/09/14-ws-policy-eds-minutes.html
People with action items: toufic

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.