ISSUE-134

Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SKOS

Raised by:

Alistair Miles

Opened on:

2008-09-30

Description:

Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]:

"""
Don't say "is /the/ owl:inverseOf ...". In OWL Full, a property p may have two
inverses q1 and q2 with q1 owl:differentFrom q2. For q1 and q2, in order to be
both inverse of p, it suffices that q1 owl:equivalentProperty q2 holds, i.e.
that q1 and q2 only have the same property extension, they don't have to be the
same resource. Better say "is owl:inverseOf". Same for S25, S26, S43. Please
check yourself whether I have missed some occurrence.
"""

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-134: Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
2. Re: ISSUE-134: Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf (from steven.pemberton@cwi.nl on 2008-09-30)
3. Re: Review of the 'SKOS Reference' Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
4. Re: ISSUE-134: Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
5. Re: ISSUE-134: Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf (from danbri@danbri.org on 2008-10-22)
6. proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
7. Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
8. ISSUE-134: Last Call Comment: owl:inverseOf (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
9. [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)

Related notes: