<em> Scribe: BrianG

<teds> back at ya!

<teds> eric, how do you get the * bit to go?

<teds> "teds" does look plural.

<em> heh :)

<LeeF> Scribe: gilmanb

convene 11:06 am

<PatCroke> I am 35391

pick up where we last left - old business

alan and tim put use case around reagents - use case has been posted on the wiki

next call is April 6th - no dissent

<scribe> new participants - Lee

Lee makes intro: Sean's stand in right now - Internet technology group - working to build life sciences research workbench

Making RDF DB as a "stack component"

working with SWAN and Tim Clark

<em> Resolved: Next HCLSIG meeting April 6th; @@ who to scribe? @@

<vipul> q

<vipul> +1 to thar

would like to put use cases on top level of the wiki

current use cases at http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIGUseCases?action=show&redirect=HCLS%2FOntologyTaskForce%2FUseCases

eric neumann asks to put use cases at the top level of the wiki

vipul - all use cases should be put at a higher level +1

brian +1

vipul second issue - need to be specified

vipul - use cases need to be specified - opinion -> use case does not define a solution they specify a problem

<vipul> I did not imply that

Vipul would like to have main area point at use cases in task forces

Can we agree to point at use cases from the main part of the wiki?

we don't need a governing body for the use cases

Ideas -> tasks agenda item

identify tasks that we can complete in the near term

EN opens floor to discuss tasks

EM - wants to talk about signing up for tasks on the wiki

Susie thinks that people are starting to sign up for tasks

em - what's happening with NCBI data?

susie -> looking at tasks in detail and figuring out what to sign up for

karen -> workshop going on immunology and ontologies

<vipul> very good question Tim!!!

what is success of the task force and this group in general?

asked by TimC

em -> W3C would like things to show up on the TR space

woops

PR -> TR

tasks forces create use cases, specifications, publications

http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/hcls/#mission

<Zakim> em, you wanted to note phone call are great, but please send discussions resolutions to the list and update the wiki

Need some practical/important "stuff" that we can produce for others and ourselves

<scribe> ACTION: en and brian spell out ROI on the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/23-hcls-minutes.html#action01]

<scribe> ACTION: Brian keeps discussion going with task forces and places names next to tasks on the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/03/23-hcls-minutes.html#action02]

gadget discussion

em - overview: history, use

<LeeF> http://simile.mit.edu/gadget/

simile leverages semweb in a practical sense

how do you build tools that make data integration easier

how do we make XML collections easier to browse for semantic meaning

gadget may help this issue

rips through large collections of XML and provides some useful statistical analysis to get "emergent semantics" out of the corpus

sounds like a structured nlp tool

works for collections where you don't have access to the folks to define elements

stats on schema or xml files?

outputs stats for xml not DTD's/Schema

em - question: What tasks that people no of about converging XML -> RDF?

Davide -> XML -> RDF in BioRDF group/task force

Davide -> NLP -> XML-> RDF

<eneumann> Possibly useful for converting CDISC XML -> RDF

<PatCroke> +1.

<PatCroke> Does the NLP group subsume the Text to RDF task force ?

<Davide> the text to RDF task force is very welcome to join the NLP group, I wouldn't think in terms of susumption

<em> hmm

<Davide> brian?

yes davide?

<Davide> do you want to talk here

<teds> bye

I actually don't have time today

<Davide> ok let me nkow

can we do it tomorrow?

<vipul> Eric .... can I talk to regarding ISWC 2006?

<em> sure

RRSAgent: actions

<Davide> yes, morning

<em> i'm still on phone

<PatCroke> \q

<eneumann> Vipul, I will get back to you after I speak with Karen

<LeeF> sure

<LeeF> "show actions" or "list action items" also should work ( http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent#actions ), ridiculously enough.

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127  of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/PR/TR/
Found Scribe: BrianG
Found Scribe: gilmanb
Inferring ScribeNick: gilmanb
Scribes: BrianG, gilmanb

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Alan Brian_Gilman Davide Emiller EricN Eric_Neumann JimM KarenS LeeF Lee_Feigenbaum P21 PatCroke SusieS Ted_Slater TimC Vipul_Kashyap aaaa aabb aacc aaee cgi-irc em eneumann gilmanb teds vipul
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy


WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-semweb-lifesci/2006Mar/0114.html
Got date from IRC log name: 23 Mar 2006
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2006/03/23-hcls-minutes.html
People with action items: brian discussion en forces going keeps names next places task with

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report